Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh man..I remember the days when Tejas vs JF-17 debate used to happen every where on this forum.
And now JF-17 has utterly left inferior tejas project in dust and surpassed it by MILESSSSS as a project. Nobody even mentions JFT in same line as tejashit anymore
We are nearing 100th JF-17 induction in PAF while tejashit is not even indicted formally in the airforce with proper squadron
This plane is already outdated the way it is when it came off production lines
I don't understand why people are even comparing a Joint Venture project like JF-17 with a bird completely designed and developed in India (irrespective of the parts used). If you want to compare, compare it with any of India's joint ventures which we are successfully running with Russia for well over 6 decades. Just consider for example JF-17 Vs Sukhoi 30MKi, which we have over 200 numbers ????
But they do believe Buddha is Korean.
We didn't claim MKI is joint venture. It's a version of Su-30 tailor made for India.Mki is not joint venture. It's Russians tweaked part of the plane for India.
The title is about Tejas, not jf blunderThat is called obsolete on arrival. Junk on the get go.
Mki is not joint venture. It's Russians tweaked part of the plane for India.
Mki is not joint venture. It's Russians tweaked part of the plane for India. Like F-15K us for Koreans. Koreans never shamelessly regard F-15 as joint ventures like Indians do. .But they do believe Buddha is Korean.
We are nearing 100th JF-17 induction in PAF while tejashit is not even indicted formally in the airforce with proper squadron