What's new

PIA’s flightpath out of turbulent times

SBD-3

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
15,120
Reaction score
-9
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Capt Shujaat Azeem, who flew fighter jets before becoming pilot to Rafic Hariri, the tycoon and Lebanese prime minister, was invited to overhaul Pakistan’s aviation sector and return PIA to the glory days he remembered from his childhood

By Rob Crilly7:30PM BST 31 May 2014
Capt Shujaat Azeem is the pilot and businessman fighting to restore Pakistan International Airlines’ battered reputation

It was another sorry chapter in a once great airline’s history. When police officers boarded the twin-engine Airbus at Leeds-Bradford airport last year, the captain had a ready excuse for the alcohol they could smell on his breath.

In Pakistan, explained Irfan Faiz, pilots only have to allow 12 hours between “bottle and throttle” to ensure they are sober enough to fly.

That did not satisfy a judge at Leeds Crown Court, and the pilot was sentenced to nine months in prison for having three times the legal limit of alcohol in his blood.

At home, the news was greeted with a mix of embarrassment and weariness – but little surprise. In its short history, Pakistan International Airlines had already gone from pride of a nation to national joke, known as Perhaps I Arrive and Panic In Air.

The man charged with turning things around is still trying to work out how any of it could have happened.

Shujaat Azeem, a pilot and businessman, shook his head as he listed the problems he had found already in his short tenure: the fuel-guzzling 747s shuttling around domestic routes, the bloated workforce and the fraud scandals of mind-boggling ingenuity.

“We had 287,000 free tickets issued last year,” he said, one of a string of statistics that he reels off in horror. “How can you ever make money like that?”

The answer is that you can’t. Last year, PIA haemorrhaged

44 billion rupees (£266m). It is only subsidies that have kept the nationalised airline in the sky, and even then nine of its 35-strong fleet of planes are unserviceable.

Last year, a new business-friendly government headed by Nawaz Sharif was voted into power, inflicting a heavy defeat on the Pakistan People’s Party with its unique combination of 70s-style central planning, low taxation and rampant corruption.

The International Monetary Fund immediately stepped in with a £4bn loan over three years, contingent on privatising state-owned industries including PIA. That means somehow turning it into the sort of business an investor might want to buy and they already have their sights on the right sort of aviation entrepreneur.

If the government can pull that off, then Pakistan’s economy may well be on the road to recovery – but there are big challenges ahead.

Capt Azeem, who flew fighter jets before becoming pilot to Rafic Hariri, the business tycoon and Lebanese prime minister, was running a ground handling company at the time. He was invited to overhaul Pakistan’s entire aviation sector and return PIA to the glory days he remembered from his childhood.

“It was the epitome of style. PIA was going places. It was one of the prides of this country,” he said.

The airline’s history mirrors the history of Pakistan, its highs and its lows. It was born out of the maelstrom of partition from India in 1947, and shaped by the politics and geography of a new country.

It began life as Orient Airways, set up on the instructions of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Pakistan’s founding father, who knew that his dream of an independent homeland for Muslims would need its own transport infrastructure.

One of its early tasks came in the immediate aftermath of partition, when its small fleet formed part of a relief operation ferrying Muslim families to the new state from Hindu-dominated India. In the years that followed, its role was to try to cement the two wings of the new country – today Pakistan and Bangladesh – flying thousands of miles across India between Karachi and Dhaka.

PIA was formed a few years later when Orient was merged with other airlines as part of a new national flag carrier.

Those early years were marked by innovation. Even today, proud Pakistanis can reel off the milestones.

It was the first Asian airline to operate jetliners (Boeing 707s), the first to offer films to all classes of passengers and the first to induct the 777-200LR into its fleet, the longest range commercial airliner.

Such was its success, that it became the template for new airlines. In the 1980s, when Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum decided to launch an airline in Dubai, he leased his first two aircraft and their crews from PIA. Today Emirates is going from strength to strength.

In contrast PIA’s creaking fleet is nothing but a case study in mismanagement. Before Capt Azeem stepped in, dozens of domestic flights would be cancelled each week. Sometimes planes would be taken out of service at a moment’s notice for the use of a minister and entourage leaving passengers stranded.

Since the 1970s, the airline has suffered three hijackings and five fatal crashes. The worst came in 1992 when an Airbus A300 crashed on approach to Kathmandu, killing all 167 people on board.

The horror stories are legion: blocked toilets, unfriendly staff, in-flight entertainment systems that don’t work for the duration of the eight-hour flight from Islamabad to London.

One foreign aid worker described being stuck on the tarmac last year when smoke billowed from an engine on a 747.

“The cabin crew opened an emergency exit but then realised they couldn’t close it. The door pretty much fell off,” she said.

The biggest problem, said Capt Azeem, was an aging fleet. His first priority is to retire the three 747s after this year’s Hajj – when thousands of Pakistanis will travel to Mecca – replacing aircraft that are almost 30 years old with newer fuel efficient models.

Such is the makeshift nature of the schedule, with aircraft having to fill gaps as others are sidelined for emergency maintenance, that long-haul 747s and 777s frequently carry passengers between Islamabad and Karachi or fly empty at exorbitant cost.

Five 777s are due in coming weeks, along with 11 leased A320s for domestic and medium routes, which will begin arriving in July.

That will slash fuel costs, said Capt Azeem, a figure that currently accounts for more than half of all PIA’s outgoings.

Already punctuality has improved and with flat bed seats planned for long-haul flights for the first time, Capt Azeem believes he can lure back wealthy Pakistanis, foreign diplomats and businessmen who have fled PIA. They prefer to spend their money on comfortable Gulf airlines and a menu that goes beyond chicken curry and a cheese paste sandwich – despite their unsocial timings and indirect routes to Europe and Canada.

“Our flights are direct and we fly at better times of the day. If the food is good, if the service is good, there’s no reason why they would not want to take PIA. We have a population of 180 million people. Over 1.1 million Pakistanis live in Britain. We have a lot of people in Paris, a lot of people in Barcelona, Milan.”

Unprofitable routes, such as to Amsterdam, have closed. The baffling global network of offices has been slimmed down and 200 staff brought home.

“We closed Chicago. We don’t have flights there. I don’t know why we had offices there,” said Capt Azeem.

He has taken time out on a Friday evening to discuss the plans over a mug of green tea. He has another meeting later – unusual in a country where many government workers finish at lunchtime for prayers and the start of the weekend.

His years in the private sector, part of a telephone consortium that brought the internet to Pakistan in the 1990s and set up one of the major mobile phone services, mean he has struggled with a considerable culture shock in getting to grips with PIA’s problems.

Political interference has hobbled the airline, he said. For years its chairman came from the Ministry of Defence and jobs were treated as gifts.

“Anyone who wanted to do someone a favour, they would hire him into the airline,” said Capt Azeem. “Corruption is another thing that has brought down this airline. In every contract there was a kickback or something like that.”

The result was an airline that employed 772 staff per aircraft - another number that seems burned into Capt Azeem’s brain – compared with fewer than 200 at other airlines.

Several hundred have already been dismissed after an investigation found they had faked their qualifications. And there are ambitious plans to transfer hundreds more jobs into standalone catering, maintenance and training operations in partnership with private companies.

For now, though, much of his time is spent undoing the various mystifying decisions taken in recent years – such as removing business class seats from the fleet of A310s.

“We still had the seats, they had just taken them out. So business travellers stopped using PIA. And that’s where the money is,” he said, pausing for a few seconds contemplation. “I have absolutely no idea why they did it.”

He is also overhauling the Civil Aviation Authority after finding that planes overflying Pakistan were not being automatically billed as they are almost anywhere else in the world, reducing revenue by a third.

“That was being done manually – for whatever reason,” he said. “Well the reasons are obvious.”

He is coy about how much it will cost to make PIA profitable, with its new planes, new menus and better-trained staff. Simply running more efficient planes and trimming the fat, he said, would be enough to get close to break even.

One source of ready cash is the company’s adventure in luxury hotels. It owns the 1000-room Roosevelt hotel, close to Grand Central Station in Manhattan, and the Scribe in Paris. Selling them could raise £1 billion, enough to wipe out decades of loans that cost £6 million every month just in interest.

None of it will be plain sailing.

His tenure has proved controversial already. He was appointed aviation adviser last year, before being forced to resign for holding a Canadian passport. (Senior officials and ministers are not allowed to hold dual nationality). He was eventually reinstated after his job title was changed to special assistant.

More opposition is sure to follow. Imran Khan, the former cricketer and head of a populist political party, has promised to fight any privatisation attempts with mass demonstrations. There are frequent accusations that Mr Sharif is intent on forcing through reforms without paying due attention to parliament or the constitution.

That leaves the government’s timetable for PIA looking rather bold. Capt Azeem hopes to be in a position to sell 26 per cent of a profitable company in a little over a year’s time, to keep the IMF at bay, and to bring in strategic investor to buy more planes.

What sort of entrepreneur would be interested in taking a gamble on an airline with such a chequered history?

“We would very much welcome Richard Branson. At some stage I will be writing to him.”
 
. .
Five 777s are due in coming weeks, along with 11 leased A320s for domestic and medium routes, which will begin arriving in July.

This is incorrect.

No 777s are due.

There are only 3 A32xs coming. The tender for 8 A320s was cancelled and a new tender closing in July has been issued.

He is also overhauling the Civil Aviation Authority after finding that planes overflying Pakistan were not being automatically billed as they are almost anywhere else in the world, reducing revenue by a third.
“That was being done manually – for whatever reason,” he said. “Well the reasons are obvious.”

He nor any other PIA employee should have anything to do with the regulatory authority (CAA). It creates a conflict of interest and can undermine safety.
 
. .
“We had 287,000 free tickets issued last year,” he said, one of a string of statistics that he reels off in horror. “How can you ever make money like that?”
Imagine if each ticket cost only $500 in average. That's 143.50 million dollars or about 14 billion rupees of free tickets.
 
.
5 777 are coming next year... hence LA route? I emailed PIA about that route earlier few months back. Also told them they could have monopoly in western canada as middle east airlines aren't allowed here...

Meanwhile Karachi to dubai, emirates alone offers 6 daily flights. These people then go buy duty free and travel other parts of world. Canada will not allow more than 3 weekly canada wide flights meanwhile. Why won't PIA do the same! Emirates done 75+ flights a week all over Pakiatan. Emirates is limited to toronto here, but emirates is everywhere in Pakistan.

What UAE gonna do? kick out workers? We really have sold our aviation sector to middle east. Next on sale:entire Pakistan.
 
.
5 777 are coming next year...

Like you said, they're due next year, not as the article claims says 'in the coming weeks'.

Also, it would be a folly to start LA, San Fran, Vancouver or any other NA city. PIA couldn't make Chicago work when Emirates, Etihad and Qatar weren't there.

As implied in the article, these 777s will replace the 747s and supplement existing 777 flights. It wouldn't be a bad idea if PIA increased the frequency and operated daily to some intl destinations like LHR, MAN, BHX and JFK
 
.
PIA is managed badly, that's why it won't make profit. Their toronto to lhe is direct flight for 1450. Saudia charges 900 with 2 stops, then Karachi.

Currently, western canada has to pay $300+ on top of PIA/Mid east airline. Plus only one luggage allowed due to domestic. So they can do $1500, and mind you, the km are very same. Moreover, PIA can do LA + western Canada (stopover to pick more passengers). Also PIA needs to land out of US before entering, like with JFK. So vancouver or calgary would be good choice. Maybe deploy one of the 300er. Lots of Pakistanis in Calgary and Vancouver area. With direct flight to Karachi, it can also ferry the bangalis internationally onwards. Right now everyone has to take domestic flight in canada, and everyone knows how much luggages desi people love to carry!

Above all, what PIA needs is to start LEASING airplanes. They bought 5 777 with cash I believe. Could've leased 10 instead and pay monthly fee. PIA has crew, gov't help etc, they just planes and an end to corruption so as to make profit. Last year they made 45b rupee loss.

London should be done with a330 type aircraft or 787. 777 should be used for very long haul. But of course PIA is cash strapped... =(

Honestly, pathetic management. They should've leased narrow body like a320 and wide body like a330 and maintain their europe and middle east network before going to NA or low pak population density places like italy or spain. Now they are using 777 for isb to khi! First have proper aircrafts for domestic and regional routes than go out getting 777s.
 
Last edited:
.
5 777 are coming next year... hence LA route? I emailed PIA about that route earlier few months back. Also told them they could have monopoly in western canada as middle east airlines aren't allowed here...

Meanwhile Karachi to dubai, emirates alone offers 6 daily flights. These people then go buy duty free and travel other parts of world. Canada will not allow more than 3 weekly canada wide flights meanwhile. Why won't PIA do the same! Emirates done 75+ flights a week all over Pakiatan. Emirates is limited to toronto here, but emirates is everywhere in Pakistan.

What UAE gonna do? kick out workers? We really have sold our aviation sector to middle east. Next on sale:entire Pakistan.

About selling aviation to foreigners.

Turkish arilines has 6 flights to Karachi. Its a PIA code share. Which means PIA has given its route to Turkish airline. Despite 6 flights, I recently traveled to Karachi, both ways flight was full. Imagine this revenue we are losing.
 
.
Moreover, PIA can do LA + western Canada (stopover to pick more passengers).

Incorrect. They can not do that as traffic rights between US-Can would not allow it. For example, Air New Zealand flies london heathrow-los angeles-auckland. Air New Zealand is not allowed to sell tickets on the los angles-auckland-los angeles segment for london origin/destination flights. Similarly, Air France flies France-los angeles-Tahiti and is similarly not allowed to sell seats and upload traffic during the stopover.

You can learn more about air traffic rights here:

http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/co...erating/StartupBoeing_Freedoms_of_the_Air.pdf

Freedoms of the air - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As an example Islamabad-Manchester = Third Freedom
Manchester-Islamabad = Fourth Freedom
Islamabad-Manchester-New York whilst selling seats on all segments = Fifth Freedom

Also PIA needs to land out of US before entering, like with JFK.

PIA already does this at Manchester. Further they have Fifth Freedom rights between Manchester-New York so they can sell seats.

Lots of Pakistanis in Calgary and Vancouver area.

So what. There's lots of Pakistanis in Chicago too. And Leeds-Bradford. And Glasgow. And Amsterdam. And Houston. And Miami. Should PIA provide a taxi service to all these stations as well?

London should be done with a330 type aircraft or 787. 777 should be used for very long haul. But of course PIA is cash strapped... =(
Honestly, pathetic management. They should've leased narrow body like a320 and wide body like a330 and maintain their europe and middle east network before going to NA or low pak population density places like italy or spain. Now they are using 777 for isb to khi! First have proper aircrafts for domestic and regional routes than go out getting 777s.

Correct. Probably the only points we'll agree on.

Turkish arilines has 6 flights to Karachi. Its a PIA code share. Which means PIA has given its route to Turkish airline. Despite 6 flights, I recently traveled to Karachi, both ways flight was full. Imagine this revenue we are losing.

Not losing any pax revenue . PIA sells the seats and markets them to get a cut too.
 
.
Sorry I've tablet so I can't quote you easily.

I'm not fully aware how these freedom thing work, but PIA can get Canada to offer some concession. PIA did do such networks with other locations, and still does, such as Japan-China-Pakistan.

Yes I know PIA does land before jfk, but didn't know which city. So my point was, they can land canada, pick passenger or drop, then move to LAX.

Yes lots of Pakistanis there, but you've to look at airport. I don't think 777 can land at leeds-bradford. Also PIA can have better revenue due to monopoly. Lots of flights go from England over to Pakistam. Anyone who travels from Canada to Pakistan has to suffer some 18 hours in transit in one of those middle east countries. People will pay extra, for they had to pay anyway due to luggage limitations and being direct flight. I believe it takes 14 hours from YVR-LHE. Almost same time as YYZ-LHE give or take one hour. There are people who'll pay hundreds more. Why?

Domestic flight allows one baggage unless flying out of mid east airlines from YYZ. So that costs some $50 return. Some planes can't fit a full size luggage, as they're regional ones. So over charges, which cost hundreds more.
As mentioned, a 14 hours direct flight vs 18ish hours in transit, multiple stop overs NOT including air time. So someone from Calgary has has to travel to YYZ to take mid east flight. Transit time + 4 hours in plane. Then flying 12 hours to mid east, 18 hours transit. Then finally getting to Pakistan. In addition, Emirates have 10 seats abreast, whereas PIA has 9, so travel is more comfortable.
One has to pay $500 return airfare + 900-1400 ticket from YYZ.

For business or even middle class people here, time values a lot. 2 days of travelling.. They rather work an extra day and pay a premium direct PIA ticket.

Also, some locations which CAN service 777 aircraft, Emirates or alike already serve there. Western Canada is untouched. Moreover, Seattle emirates ticket cost $1500 vs $1200 at LAX due to it only offering 777 aircraft, not a380 and limited slots. Also Canada hates mid east airlines, so only 3 a380 flights a week by emirates. Emirates wants to serve more locations, but isn't allowed.

And i don't mean to say PIA shouldn't serve the rest of locations. Point is, serve where you can have monopoly and charge premium price.

The last thing you said, sure PIA gets a cut, but it isn't as ,uch as they would want to. I don't know if PIA has code share with emirates, but 6 flights a day every week with a330 craft, do you know how much business emirates is taking away? Just emirates alone. Meanwhile PIA has 2 flights a week! Sure they don't have more aircrafts, but thats bullocks. When you start making revenue, you can lease in more aircrafts. Pay a premium or whatever, you would still be racking in big profits. Emirates has almost all planes leased out with 6-8 years, so PIA should also consider leasing aircraft in bunch and start taking in revenue than just buying planes.

Maybe that billion dollar they used to pay 5 777s, well, use the billion over a year and lease some 20 777s. I am sure they'll have an extra billion in profits. There are millions of customers, just need damn planes. What BA, Emirates and alike do is offer desi movies, Pakistani flight attendents and food etc because people love PIA and love flying with fellown Pakistanis and enjoying the culture. They can have these customers back if they get some planes!

TL: DR

PIA needs planes and needs to SEVEARLY limit mid east airlines. If they do 5 flights, so do you. Not 42-2 flights just from Karachi. Canada has no flights to UAE and offers no more slots than 3 to emirates. And Pakistan has to cut slots by large for they'll replace a330 with a380, which is like almost double the seats, or 84 flights.
 
.
but PIA can get Canada to offer some concession.

It's not just Canada that has to agree. The US has to agree too. After all, you're competing against airlines from both countries.

So my point was, they can land canada, pick passenger or drop, then move to LAX.

I understand you're point. But like I've said above,Fifth Freedom rights can be extremely hard to get, especially in big markets where there are a lot of competing carriers. Off the top off my head, PIA would be competing against American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Jet Blue, Air Canada, West Jet, Porter Airlines and probably others for 10 000s of pax every week.

Compared to say

Japan-China-Pakistan.

where no Japanese airlines serve Pakistan and only one Chinese airline and a very limited market.

I don't think 777 can land at leeds-bradford.

The 777 can easily land and takeoff from Leeds-Bradford.

Also PIA can have better revenue due to monopoly.

Like I said, PIA had a monopoly in Chicago. It didn't make a difference. Load factors averaged 60%. With low yielding Pakistani pax, even with fuel efficient aircraft like the 777 they couldn't make it work. There isn't a cat in hells chance they can make smaller markets on the West coast work.

I'll ask you the same question I ask on these forums every other week but which no one answers - If Air India, which serves a much larger market, has newer fuel efficient aircraft, is flying from a stable home base can't make money on it's North America and European routes, how is PIA expected to do the same?

Then finally getting to Pakistan. In addition, Emirates have 10 seats abreast, whereas PIA has 9, so travel is more comfortable.

Most customers, especially Pakistani and Indian customers, book on the basis of price, regardless of whether the flight takes longer, is less comfortable etc. Even Air Canada is switching to 10 abreast on the 777 and it wouldn't surprise me if the 77W due next year for PIA also have 10 abreast in Y.

For business or even middle class people here, time values a lot. 2 days of travelling.. They rather work an extra day and pay a premium direct PIA ticket

Whilst you're right in saying many will pay a premium, it is not enough to justify a 777 service nor even a 787 service for that matter.

I don't know if PIA has code share with emirates,

PIA doesn't codeshare with Emirates. I was referring to the codeshare point made about Turkish Airlines.

emirates, but 6 flights a day every week with a330 craft, do you know how much business emirates is taking away?

This is a good thing. Competition in the market (more seats) drives down prices. If you can't compete, you don't belong. The Pakistani Govt should not be protecting the airline by restricting traffic rights to other countries. If ultimately that means the demise of PIA, then so be it.

Emirates has almost all planes leased out with 6-8 years

Just because Emirates follows a particular aircraft acquisition model, that does not necessarily mean that PIA should do the same. In the short term, I would probably agree that PIA should go down the lease route. However long term, PIA can't afford to do that and needs to think about purchasing aircraft outright as at the moment PIA is struggling to service it's debts (PIA leased 1 777 from ILFC).

Maybe that billion dollar they used to pay 5 777s

Actual price they're paying is $750mn or $150mn per 777.

use the billion over a year and lease some 20 777s.

You can't just turn up to Boeing or Airbus or any lessor and say I want x amount aircraft now. Understand there is a market, and models like the A330 and 777 are extremely popular. If you want 20, you're going to need to wait 2-3yrs. Also, it costs $1.2mn/month to lease a new 777 and over $14mn a year. For 20 aircraft, after 3 years, your $1Bn is gone with no assets to show for it.

What BA, Emirates and alike do is offer desi movies, Pakistani flight attendents and food etc because people love PIA and love flying with fellown Pakistanis and enjoying the culture.

British Airways don't fly to Pakistan and haven't done so since the hotel bombing in Islamabad in 2008 (I think).

And Pakistan has to cut slots by large for they'll replace a330 with a380, which is like almost double the seats, or 84 flights.

Competition is healthy. Learn it!
 
.
Incorrect. They can not do that as traffic rights between US-Can would not allow it. For example, Air New Zealand flies london heathrow-los angeles-auckland. Air New Zealand is not allowed to sell tickets on the los angles-auckland-los angeles segment for london origin/destination flights. Similarly, Air France flies France-los angeles-Tahiti and is similarly not allowed to sell seats and upload traffic during the stopover.

PIA already does this at Manchester. Further they have Fifth Freedom rights between Manchester-New York so they can sell seats.

So what. There's lots of Pakistanis in Chicago too. And Leeds-Bradford. And Glasgow. And Amsterdam. And Houston. And Miami. Should PIA provide a taxi service to all these stations as well?

Not losing any pax revenue . PIA sells the seats and markets them to get a cut too.

Code share is a lost revenue. We only get a share of revenue, not if we were flying that route ourselves. Also, this was the route PIA was flying.

So help me understand this. If PIA starts operations from Chicago, LAX or Vancouver for example, what will that operation be based on? It will be revenue, right? So when you said that PIA cant fly to all areas where Pakistanis are in high density what did you mean by that? After all, only those areas where there are more Pakistanis concentrated, does PIA get more revenue.

I recently traveled Turkish airlines and impressed by their vast operation and great service. I know Pakistan has different situation than Turkey but if you have flown out of Istanbul airport, you will be impressed by how big Turkish airline operation is. I just wished we could have such a big airline and operation too. But that was just a wish!
 
.
I know Pakistan has different situation than Turkey but if you have flown out of Istanbul airport, you will be impressed by how big Turkish airline operation is

I agree Turkish growth is very impressive and sustainable. I flew with them just recently for a conference in Astana Kazakhstan. Very nice business lounges and food too!

So when you said that PIA cant fly to all areas where Pakistanis are in high density what did you mean by that

PIA caters predominantly to the Pakistani diaspora. The cities I listed, whilst having large Pak numbers, due to airline operating costs and low yields (amount of revenue per seat) can not be operated profitably (hence the taxi service remark). Most PIA flights are low yielding.

I just wished we could have such a big airline and operation too.

The difference is, in the 90s Turkish Airlines moved away from being what PIA is - a VFR (visiting family relation) airline which focused on the Turkish diaspora. Turkish now has a very good balance between O+D (origin and destination) traffic and onward connections traffic (which is mainly what Etihad, Emirates and Qatar do).
 
.
codeshare.jpg


On the topic of code shares. See. They're not altogether evil.

Turkish Airlines: narrowing the strategic Gulf: Part 2 | CAPA - Centre for Aviation
 
.
Back
Top Bottom