What's new

Philippines Defence Forum

Don't blame the US for the weapon quality, it's well known that US made weapon is the most expensive to procure. I think, expecting free top of the line of weapon is a bit much, unless your country have great strategic importance (Pakistan, Afgan, Egypt) or Israel. I seriously don't believe and see no reason at all why US will reject PH purchase if they really want to pay. After all, PH government always have the chance to buy from the EU/Korea anytime they ready to pay up using cash/loan.

What I mean is that when it comes to more sophisticated weapons, we can't rely on US giving better weapons as we will end up acquiring used weapons from them that they do not want anymore, thus we should look less towards US and more towards other countries that supplies weapons.
 
Last edited:
.
Representatives from the Phillippines Navy Toured the M/V Susitna

Aug 30, 2014

Ketchikan, AK - Efforts to sell an unused ferry owned by the Mat-Su borough continued Thursday. Four officials from the Phillippines Navy, and a U.S. Navy advisor examined the ship during a demonstration outside of Ketchikan.

“We get a lot of typhoons, and we do a lot of disaster response operations, this is something that we can do for that purpose."

The M/V Susitna is not your typical ferry. It was designed by the navy as a warship prototype for 75 million dollars. ...

Now the borough wants to sell it for $6 million.

The M/V Susitna was originally designed to carry 150 passengers and 50 vehicles, but if the Philippines Navy is interested in buying it, they plan to use it for other purposes.

"This is a very unique vessel, that we can beach it,” said Captain Carlos. “It's a catamaran type; we can load a lot of stuff in here."

It could be several months before the Philippines government makes a decision on the ship. Meantime, the Mat-Su Borough is settling up on a bill from the federal government.
03MC19560.jpg


____________________________________________
Wish we had this prior Typhoon Haiyan. Hope the PN get this ship
 
. . .
AAV/KAAV 7 functionally is different from BMP3, AAV/KAAV7 is more like amphibious APC whereas BMP3 have more and bigger punch and can be put as spearhead on beaching operation


So both are actually complementing each other rather than replacing one another


The Phil Marine choose the AAV7 platform for their amphibious vehicle on the 2 upcoming SSV ordered from indonesia. A korean firm was chosen to provide KAAV7A1 amphibious assault vehicle, but problems occur due to technical issues on the bid. Until now there's no news, its either the PMC choose the AAV7 or look for other tanks like the BMP-3F. A combination of both is a good idea as the BMP-3 offer fire support role.

You guys have BMP-3 and AAV7's right?
 
.
AAV/KAAV 7 functionally is different from BMP3, AAV/KAAV7 is more like amphibious APC whereas BMP3 have more and bigger punch and can be put as spearhead on beaching operation


So both are actually complementing each other rather than replacing one another

That's why we should procure the BMP-3 armed with 100mm gun so that we can replace our fire-support vehicles which are the LAV-300 and the "resurrected" LVTH-6.
 
. .
Golan Heights peacekeeper crisis: Filipinos escape, Fijians taken hostage | World news | The Guardian
-----
Golan Heights peacekeeper crisis: Filipinos escape, Fijians taken hostage
40 UN peacekeepers escape their besieged outpost while 44 Fijian troops are taken by al-Qaida affiliate al-Nusra Front
Associated Press in Beirut, The Guardian, Sunday 31 August 2014 19.06 BST

Under cover of darkness, 40 Filipino peacekeepers escaped their besieged outpost in the Golan Heights on Sunday after a seven-hour gun battle with Syrian rebels. Al-Qaida-linked insurgents are still holding 44 Fijian troops captive.

The getaway, combined with the departure of another entrapped group of Filipino troops, marked a major step forward in a crisis that erupted on Thursday when Syrian rebels began targeting the peacekeeping forces. The United Nations security Ccouncil has condemned the assaults on the international troops monitoring the Syrian-Israeli frontier, and has demanded the unconditional release of those still in captivity.

The crisis began when Syrian rebels overran the Quneitra crossing located on the de facto border between Syrian- and Israeli-controlled parts of the Golan Heights on Wednesday. A day later, insurgents from the al-Qaida-affiliated Nusra Front seized the Fijian peacekeepers and surrounded their Filipino colleagues, demanding they surrender.

The Filipinos, occupying two UN encampments, refused and fought the rebels on Saturday. The first group of 35 peacekeepers was then successfully escorted out of a UN encampment in Breiqa by Irish and Filipino forces on board armoured vehicles.

The remaining 40 peacekeepers were besieged at the second encampment, called Rwihana, by more than 100 gunmen who rammed the camp's gates with their trucks and fired mortar rounds. The Filipinos returned fire in self-defense, Philippine military officials said.

At one point, Syrian government forces fired artillery rounds from a distance to prevent the Filipino peacekeepers from being overwhelmed, said Colonel Roberto Ancan, a Philippine military official who helped monitor the tense standoff from the Philippine capital, Manila, and mobilise support for the besieged troops.

"Although they were surrounded and outnumbered, they held their ground for seven hours," Philippine military chief General Gregorio Pio Catapang said, adding that there were no Filipino casualties. "We commend our soldiers for exhibiting resolve even while under heavy fire."

As night fell and a ceasefire took hold, the 40 Filipinos fled with their weapons, travelling across the chilly hills for nearly two hours before meeting up with other UN forces, who escorted them to safety early Sunday, Philippine officials said.

"We may call it the greatest escape," Catapang told reporters in Manila.

The Syrian and Israeli governments, along with the US and Qatar, provided support, the Philippine military said without elaborating.

In New York, the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF), whose mission is to monitor a 1974 disengagement in the Golan Heights between Israel and Syria, reported that shortly after midnight local time, during a ceasefire agreed with the armed elements, all 40 Filipino peacekeepers left their position and "arrived in a safe location one hour later."

UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon spoke with the prime minister of Fiji by telephone Sunday, and promised that the United Nations was "doing its utmost to obtain the unconditional and immediate release" of the Fijian peacekeepers, Ban's office said.

The Fiji Times Online reported that Fiji's military commander expressed concern that the exact locations of the Fijian peacekeepers remain unconfirmed.

Military commander brigadier general Mosese Tikoitoga also told reporters in the South Pacific island nation on Sunday that contacts on the ground in the Golan Heights have assured the military of the captured soldiers' well-being, the report said.

He said a UN negotiation team and Fijians in Syria were working toward the peacekeepers' release.

The Nusra Front, meanwhile, confirmed that it had seized the Fijians. In a statement posted online, the group published a photo showing what it said were the captured Fijians in their military uniforms along with 45 identification cards. The group said the men "are in a safe place and in good health, and everything they need in terms of food and medicine is given to them."

It was unclear why the number of detained peacekeepers differed from the 44 figure provided by the UN.

The statement mentioned no demands or conditions for the peacekeepers' release.

 
.
New York Times hits Aquino for ‘political mischief’ | Inquirer Global Nation

New York Times hits Aquino for ‘political mischief’
Marc Jayson Cayabyab |INQUIRER.net 9:03 pm | Friday, August 29th, 2014

MANILA, Philippines – The “New York Times” criticized President Benigno Aquino III for alleged “political mischief” as he accused the Supreme Court of having grown “too powerful” after it voted against his economic program and of hinting at extending his term beyond 2016.

“President Benigno Aquino III of the Philippines is now hinting at running for a second term in 2016, which would require a constitutional amendment,” read the August 28 NYT editorial entitled “Political mischief in the Philippines”.

“He has also suggested limiting the power of the Supreme Court, which, on July 1, declared parts of his economic program illegal. That, too, would require adjusting the Constitution,” the same editorial read.

It said that these were “threats” that “jeopardize Philippine democracy”.

In a recent interview on local radio, Aquino said he was not after a second term but that he was willing to listen to what his constituents had to say, citing how some have expressed their wish for him to extend his term.

“Am I the one who has this ambition to extend my term?… As I said when I first ran for office, ‘I’m no masochist,’” Aquino said in Filipino.

“Mr. Aquino wants more time to complete his reform programs, but there will always be unfinished business. The 1987 Constitution limits the president to a single six-year term. The Constitution was promulgated under his mother, Corazon Aquino, after the overthrow of the 20-year dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos. Despite her efforts, the presidency remained a fount of patronage and a source of corruption. Mr. Aquino’s two immediate predecessors, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and Joseph Estrada, were charged after they left office with illegally feeding from the public trough. Ms. Arroyo was charged with misusing state lottery funds. Mr. Estrada was removed from office and convicted of various corruption charges, but he was pardoned in 2007,” the editorial said.

Aquino has also been at loggerheads with the Supreme Court since it ruled that parts of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) were unconstitutional.

He claimed that the high tribunal has become “too powerful” and that “someone has to reassert executive authority”.

“Mr. Aquino believes that the Supreme Court has grown too powerful and that someone needs to reassert executive authority. By a 13-to-0 vote, the court struck down a spending program he created to stimulate the economy. It ruled that he had exceeded his authority in disbursing funds and that parts of the program consisted of irregular pork-barrel spending,” the same editorial read.

The editorial said that Aquino came to power in 2010 with the promise to rid the Philippines of corruption.

It said that at that time, the country ranked 134th in Transparency International’s corruption index and 94th in 2013.

“Mr. Aquino should uphold the Constitution of a fragile democracy if only out of respect for his father, who was assassinated in the struggle against Marcos, and for his mother, who died in 2009 after leading the ‘people power’ that triumphed over the excesses and abuses of the presidency,” the editorial said.

“In practical terms, that means he should stop butting heads with the court and gracefully step down when his term is up,” it said.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The said New York Times article...which is in an "Opinion Pages"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Political Mischief in the Philippines
The Opinion Pages | Editorial
AUG. 28, 2014

President Benigno Aquino III of the Philippines is now hinting at running for a second term in 2016, which would require a constitutional amendment. He has also suggested limiting the power of the Supreme Court, which, on July 1, declared parts of Mr. Aquino’s economic program illegal. That, too, would require adjusting the Constitution. These threats jeopardize Philippine democracy.

Mr. Aquino wants more time to complete his reform programs, but there will always be unfinished business. The 1987 Constitution limits the president to a single six-year term. The Constitution was promulgated under his mother, Corazon Aquino, after the overthrow of the 20-year dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos. Despite her efforts, the presidency remained a fount of patronage and a source of corruption. Mr. Aquino’s two immediate predecessors, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and Joseph Estrada, were charged after they left office with illegally feeding from the public trough. Ms. Arroyo was charged with misusing state lottery funds. Mr. Estrada was removed from office and convicted of various corruption charges, but he was pardoned in 2007.

Mr. Aquino believes that the Supreme Court has grown too powerful and that someone needs to reassert executive authority. By a 13-to-0 vote, the court struck down a spending program he created to stimulate the economy. It ruled that he had exceeded his authority in disbursing funds and that parts of the program consisted of irregular pork-barrel spending.

Mr. Aquino came to power in 2010 vowing to rid the Philippines of corruption. At that time, the country ranked 134th in Transparency International’s corruption index. In 2013, it ranked 94th. Mr. Aquino should uphold the Constitution of a fragile democracy if only out of respect for his father, who was assassinated in the struggle against Marcos, and for his mother, who died in 2009 after leading the “people power” that triumphed over the excesses and abuses of the presidency. In practical terms, that means he should stop butting heads with the court and gracefully step down when his term is up.






 
.
Let's not make this thread an aquino hate thread please, leave the politics out of this. I'm not defending him or proving to everyone here your wrong, its just that im tired of hearing this $hit. Hearing it everytime in news and now here, our officials and politician (administration/opposition) should just concentrate on the problems were facing instead of bickering

AAV/KAAV 7 functionally is different from BMP3, AAV/KAAV7 is more like amphibious APC whereas BMP3 have more and bigger punch and can be put as spearhead on beaching operation


So both are actually complementing each other rather than replacing one another

That's just what I said
 
.
Paranoids exaggerate their own delusions! the cottage industry of Aquino bashers here are just out of making noise, anyway they're just a nano-minority so I don't care! :lol:

images



Just read the good news!

Philippine House Rejects Aquino Impeachment
MANILA, Philippines — Sep 2, 2014
AP_logo_update_20130709.gif


The Philippine House of Representatives' justice committee has rejected three impeachment complaints against President Benigno Aquino III.

The committee, dominated by Aquino allies, voted against the complaints, 54-4, on Tuesday, declaring them insufficient in substance and killing the challenges.


The complaints were filed by mostly left-wing activists and sponsored by the House's left-wing bloc. They accused Aquino of culpable violation of the constitution, betrayal of public trust and corruption.

The complaints cited Aquino's implementation of a major economic stimulus program declared partly unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and a defense cooperation agreement that gives American troops greater access to bases across the Philippines.

The son of pro-democracy icons, Aquino won the presidency by a wide margin in 2010 on a promise to rid his nation of corruption and widespread poverty.

Philippine House Rejects Aquino Impeachment - ABC News
 
.
President Aquino is credited for the modernization of AFP, peace deal with MILF and some economic improvements but there are so many issues that need to be resolved.
 
.
President Aquino is credited for the modernization of AFP, peace deal with MILF and some economic improvements but there are so many issues that need to be resolved.

But that doesn't mean you have to become a drone. I have notice that many Pinoys here are "pro-Aquino" and that I am the only "anti-Aquino" here. I am beginning to wonder if the old posts here are always pro-Aquino and that I am the only one who posts the other side of the PH government that is rarely tackled by the the majority of Pinoy members here.

and before anyone judge, I am NOT pro-China.
 
.
But that doesn't mean you have to become a drone. I have notice that many Pinoys here are "pro-Aquino" and that I am the only "anti-Aquino" here. I am beginning to wonder if the old posts here are always pro-Aquino and that I am the only one who posts the other side of the PH government that is rarely tackled by the the majority of Pinoy members here.

and before anyone judge, I am NOT pro-China.

As for me am not anti or pro i just give him my thumb up and thumb down if he screws up its just that simply his the President i dont support the person i could not care less about some political elite but i do care about the Office and the Presidency and the symblolism of said office that Embodies the Nation.
 
.
But that doesn't mean you have to become a drone. I have notice that many Pinoys here are "pro-Aquino" and that I am the only "anti-Aquino" here. I am beginning to wonder if the old posts here are always pro-Aquino and that I am the only one who posts the other side of the PH government that is rarely tackled by the the majority of Pinoy members here.

and before anyone judge, I am NOT pro-China.
I'm not really pro-Aquino. I actually do not support him in some areas. But I must admit that there is more change today than it had been in the past though there still so many issues that he needs to address. I just hope our politicians both administration and opposition can work together hand-in-hand to serve the people well instead of bickering in public.

_______________________

Funding for Cebu Bus Rapid Transit system approved
The BRT, which is set to roll out this year, will be funded through loans from various international agencies

Published Aug 27, 2014

20140317-bus-rapid-transit-shutterstock_48DF4F9C5C9F40C49EA324A7AA76125C.jpg


MANILA, Philippines – The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) has approved the funding strategy for the Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project.

Of the total project cost of P10.62 billion ($244.78 million*), P9.48 billion ($218.48 million) will be funded by borrowings and the remaining P1.14 billion ($34.11 million), which will be used to acquire vehicles for the BRT, will be financed by the private sector.

The P9.48 billion will come from loans from Agence Française de Développement, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Clean Technology Fund.

DBM Secretary Florencio "Butch" Abad said the borrowings would be sourced through a Forward Obligational Authority, a process needed for government to be spared from servicing unnecessary commitment fees.

The Cebu BRT is one of the current administration's priority projects, as mentioned by President Benigno Aquino III in his 5th State of the Nation Address.

Set to roll out this year, the 23-kilometer Cebu BRT will have 33 stations and 176 environment-friendly buses. It is meant to enhance urban mobility in the country's second biggest metropolis.

"The new bus transit …will provide a safer, more efficient, and environment-friendly mode of travel in and around Cebu City," Abad said, adding that the project would be completed by 2018.

Earlier, Transportation Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya said the BRT system aims to improve commuter experience and upgrade the country's transportation system in light of worsening traffic congestion.

The BRT system was popularized in Bogota, Colombia in 2000 through the efforts of its mayor at the time – Enrique Peñalosa. The system was widely recognized for helping reduce air pollution, average travel time, and road accidents in Bogota.

In a message, Peñalosa said the BRT system would be of tremendous benefit to Cebuanos.

“The Cebu BRT will do many things: it will help Cebu’s mobility and save transportation time to tens of thousands of Cebuanos, which they will better spend with family and friends; it will help Cebu’s urban structure; it will be a symbol of democracy, as public transport users move faster than those in private cars; it will strengthen Cebuanos’ confidence in their capacity to create their destiny,” Peñalosa said.

Funding for Cebu Bus Rapid Transit system approved
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom