What's new

Philippines Defence Forum

We have no carl gustav in the marines inventory we have law weapons and the airtronic RPG is only for the army



No actual the marines are better armed than the army plus better train and the few compare to the army and they funded more plus no corruption maybe a few years ago but not today

Which is why the PH Marine Corps must also acquire those weapons or at least similar weapons that are cheaper. I think the LAW weapon is the Armbrust, possible replacement for that weapon are either Panzerfaust 3 or Matador, the latter being a weapon based from the Armbrust. With the exception to the AAVP-7, if we cannot give amphibious fighting vehicles (such as BMP-3) to the Marines, we should at least give them better anti-armor and anti-materiel weapons.
 
.
Which is why the PH Marine Corps should also opt for BMP-3s, helicopters such as AH-1 Cobras as well as anti-tank weapons such as Carl Gustav recoiless guns, Mk. 153 SMAWs and RPG-7s, along with better training, communications gear and protective gear just to increase the capability of the PhMC. Sadly, the generals and admirals are heavily involved in Philippine politics.

Well we going there if you been monitoring the credible minimum defense projects of the AFP you would know.
as far is equipment goes they far better equip now from assualt rifles to presonnel protection to comminications the have good anti tank and anti material weapons too they still keep older modified weapons but majority are new ones as for air support thats the job of the Navy air corp and the airforce as part of the credible defense program the Aw109 can droop troops and the Anti sub helicopters can also support air strikes (still in bidding but the AW159 Wildcat naval helicopter is strong contender) and also we have the AAV7 amphibious assault vehicle (korean version for the SSV project)
 
.
Which is why the PH Marine Corps must also acquire those weapons or at least similar weapons that are cheaper. I think the LAW weapon is the Armbrust, possible replacement for that weapon are either Panzerfaust 3 or Matador, the latter being a weapon based from the Armbrust. With the exception to the AAVP-7, if we cannot give amphibious fighting vehicles (such as BMP-3) to the Marines, we should at least give them better anti-armor and anti-materiel weapons.

Well the Laws are pretty much effective but and yes there are plans to replace them but no bids yet becuase the Navy and the Airforces projects must good first and the PMC still have projects to bid off to but like the Army since the Navy air corp and the Airforce did buy the same helicopters the AW109 project which both them bought so maybe after the Army is finish with the deliever of Amercian RPGs maybe the PMC can do the samething but since they have some difference in mission profiles i think the Spike ER or the new version of the Spike would be bought by the PMC with the Army following because they asking for bigger specification then the Army which sometimes the Army ignores or follows anyway as for the BMP we are currently looking at it but the Koreans since we have defense cooperation and pact with South Korea we are looking at the AAV7A1 Korean version since we are familiar with the vechicle than the BMP family of Vechicles which is something new but Russia is also asking for a bigger defense cooperation with the Philippines as of now they pushing for a defense cooperation deal with Philippines to supply the Philippines with equipment, vehicles (BMP being look at by the Philippines and offered by Russia) among others but due to the ukraine crisis and the shoot down of that Malaysian plan that killed 3 filipinos we can not say for sure if the defense cooperation pact will happen anytime soon
 
.
Well we going there if you been monitoring the credible minimum defense projects of the AFP you would know.
as far is equipment goes they far better equip now from assualt rifles to presonnel protection to comminications the have good anti tank and anti material weapons too they still keep older modified weapons but majority are new ones as for air support thats the job of the Navy air corp and the airforce as part of the credible defense program the Aw109 can droop troops and the Anti sub helicopters can also support air strikes (still in bidding but the AW159 Wildcat naval helicopter is strong contender) and also we have the AAV7 amphibious assault vehicle (korean version for the SSV project)

Well for the Army, we should also consider buying more ACV-300, specifically the one with a BMP-3 turret. I just feel the M113 armed with 76mm gun is not sufficient against armored vehicles.

Anyways, what about the air-defense missiles? The last time I read about it, we are in talks with Israel for the SPYDER air-defense missiles and the government is also considering the HAWK air-defense missiles.
 
.
Well for the Army, we should also consider buying more ACV-300, specifically the one with a BMP-3 turret. I just feel the M113 armed with 76mm gun is not sufficient against armored vehicles.

Anyways, what about the air-defense missiles? The last time I read about it, we are in talks with Israel for the SPYDER air-defense missiles and the government is also considering the HAWK air-defense missiles.

No need we have alot of M113 and are new ones are armed with 90mm guns and 20mm guns with new fire control system from Israel plus new armor please read the credible defense projects of the AFP and as for the HAWK air defense no news and also for the Spyder air defense system
 
.
Which is why the PH Marine Corps should also opt for BMP-3s, helicopters such as AH-1 Cobras as well as anti-tank weapons such as Carl Gustav recoiless guns, Mk. 153 SMAWs and RPG-7s, along with better training, communications gear and protective gear just to increase the capability of the PhMC. Sadly, the generals and admirals are heavily involved in Philippine politics.

the willing to reform is the key, the needs of weapons is largely depend on your perception of threat and what kind of doctrine your armed forces to adopt. Basically, without knowing the essence of why some weapons is made you cannot utilize them to the full extent of their potential uses.

As an examples, the formation of Ph Marine forces today is largely composed of infantry soldiers with not withstanding amphibious armored units, without adequate infantry fire support and the most important your Navy doesn't have adequate Naval unit to protect your Marines and doesn't have any means to landing your marine forces into the shore of their intended target . But as far as i can see, the Ph Marine forces is still trying to adopt a similar way and similar doctrinal combined in arms approach of the US Marines forces as part of US Marines forces legacy had into your Marine forces.

Thus with the minimum resources you had today and doctrinal approach you had, we can deduct what the most important thing the Ph Marines right now urgently needed.

1. Your Marine need a necessary platform to doing some amphibious landing operation, thus we need an LPD or LST first, then you need Landing Craft Tank and RHIB to bring your marine forces ashore.
2. Your Marine need a necessary support from your Navy to protect their Landing Ship Platform when conduct an operation, thus your Frigate acquisition programme actually is an urgent need. But Pohang class corvette grants will give you some minor rest
3. Your marine need amphibious armored unit to giving some level of protection and firepower for the first wave of landing operation, IMHO AAV7A is actually a preferred choice over BMP-3F given the urgent need to bring more squad units with their own firepower for the first landing unit. Actually Ph more needed a battle taxi than an IFV today.
4. Your marines need more firepower by giving more infantry fire support to the arms, thus by giving more artillery unit to Ph Marines you can deliver more punch to your adversary.

that's all i want to say, and for the portable infantry weapons, anything you has mentioned above is a capable and combat tested weapons platform.
 
. .
Port congestion in Manila may lead to higher inflation, traders warn
August 7, 2014 8:47pm

Prices of most imported goods would likely go up in the coming days due to limited supply caused by the congestion in two ports in Manila, traders and government officials warned Thursday.

Steven Cua, President of the Philippine Amalgamated Supermarkets Association Inc. (PASI), said the delay in the movement of container vans from the Manila International Container Port and the Port of Manila has already caused a significant decrease in the supply of fresh milk and detergent soap.

The limited supply of these everyday consumer goods would likely result in an increase in prices, he said in a report aired on GMA News' 24 Oras program.

A daytime truck ban in Manila and related transport problems have caused a backlog in the delivery of goods in and out of the ports in recent months, leading to the congestion.

Cua said the supply of imported raw materials used by local manufacturers was also affected by the problem.

“A lot of items mag-iincrease ng presyo kung ganun, dahil a lot of the components ng ating ginagamit pang araw-araw ay imported. In fact, may manufacturer na nagsabi, paglabas (from port) medyo sira na yung produkto nila,” Cua said.
(A lot of items will have an inflation because a lot of components that we used everyday are all imported. In fact, a manufacturer said that their products have expired once it leaves the port.)

Emerson Palad, Department of Agriculture (DA) Undersecretary for Field Operations, also warned of a possible increase in prices of agricultural produce due to the gridlock in and around the ports.

“Maaari po na dahil sa congestion sa ports ay ma-discourage ang ilang importers na magpasok ng kanilang kalakal at magkulang ang lokal na supply at magbungsod ng posibleng pagtaas ng presyo,” Palad said in a statement.
(It is this congestion in the ports that many importers will be discourage to import their products, leading to a low supply and would cause inflation on prices.)

He said several traders are already complaining about the delays in the release of containers vans, which has reportedly resulted in the spoilage of goods and additional costs.

Several shipments of imported fruits and garlic remain stuck at the ports, Palad said, citing information they received from the Bureau of Plant Industry.

In one supermarket in Quezon City, prices of imported fruits such as pear, apple, orange and ponkan have begun to increase by up to 20 to 25 per cent, the 24 Oras report noted.

Fuji Apples are now at P25 per piece from the previous P20; oranges now sell at P25 per piece from P20; ponkans are at P20 from P15, and pears at P37 from P25.

Probe sought

On Wednesday, Senators Chiz Escudero and Bam Aquino filed separate resolutions seeking an investigation on the congestion in Manila ports, saying the situation must be resolved immediately to avoid the prospect of a nationwide “economic catastrophe.”

Aquino said the Bureau of Export Trade Promotion's forecast of a 5.8 percent to 7.2 percent export growth this year may no longer be attained because of the situation in the ports.

The senator said inefficient port operations have adversely effected free enterprise and the competitiveness of Philippine goods.

Aquino suggested that authorities look into the possibility of using the Ports of Batangas and Subic Bay as alternative drop-off points for cargo vessels.

He said Vietnam had the same problem, but was solved after cargo vessels were diverted to the alternate ports of Ben Nghe and Phu Huu, aside from upgrading the Cat Lai port.

Prof. Cayetano Paderanga of the University of the Philippines School of Economics warned that the delay in the delivery of goods might also affect the country's gross domestic product for the whole year.

“Kasi kapag yung intermediate goods or raw materials hindi nakapasok, babagal ang produksyon, titigil ang trabaho, maapektuhan yung output,” Paderanga said.
(If the intermediate goods or raw materials are not delivered, production will slow down, jobs will stop and the output will be affected.)

Subic as alternative port

Meanwhile, Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) chairman and director Roberto Garcia said the port of Subic is willing to accommodate some of the container vans from Manila's ports.

“Para makatulong naman sa mga negosyante namin dito sa Subic at Central Luzon, sabi namin, bakit hindi kaya gamitin muna ang aming container port bilang storage area dahil under-utilized po ang container port namin at kasyang-kasya ang 7,000 container vans dito,” Garcia said in a phone patch interview aired on GMA News TV's “Quick Response Team”.
(We said that, in order to helps the traders here in Subic and Central Luzon, the container port storage here in Subic should be used as a storage area as this is under-utilized and 7000 container vans (intermodal containers) can be stored here.)

He said Subic could also accommodate ships carrying cargo for delivery in neighboring provinces.

“Ang problema diyan sa Maynila ay hindi na sila makapag-baba ng cargo dahil wala nang space na paglalagyan dahil marami pong empty containers po dun. So, this is mainly for the empty container vans and cargoes destined for Central Luzon,” Garcia said.
(The problem as to why cargo cannot be unloaded in Manila(port) is because there is no space left for the cargo to be unloaded to as there are many empty containers there. So, this is mainly for the empty container vans and cargoes destined for Central Luzon.)

“Imbes na makadadag pa sila sa traffic diyan sa Maynila, dapat yung cargo for Central Luzon, ideretso na nila dito,” he added.
(This in turn increases the traffic in Manila thus all cargo bound for Central Luzon should be directed here (in Subic))

“Marami kaming importer at exporter na mga Japanese companies, Taiwanese companies na kailangang kailangan makagamit ng Port of Subic. Mas mura ang shipping fee dito, walang truck ban, 24 hours ang operation at walang baha, so marami talagang benefits,” Garcia said.
(We have a lot of importer and exporter coming from Japanese companies and Taiwanese companies that need to use the Port of Subic. The shipping fee here is cheaper and there is no truck ban thus the port has 24-hour continuous operation and the area is not prone to flooding, thus there are many benefits here.)

Elizabeth Marcelo/NB/YA, GMA News

-----
Port congestion in Manila may lead to higher inflation, traders warn | Economy | GMA News Online
 
Last edited:
.
Since no Pinoy members has posted this news which was reported last July, I guess I should post this.

------

Phl’s tallest structure to rise in QC

MANILA, Philippines - Plans are underway to build what could be the highest structure in the Philippines on a seven-hectare property formerly occupied by the Manila Seedling Bank Foundation (MSBF), a Quezon City official said yesterday.

Victor Endriga, senior adviser to Mayor Herbert Bautista, said in a phone interview with The STAR yesterday that they plan to build a P15 billion, 612-meter telecommunications tower that will be called the Philippine Diamond Tower.

Endriga confirmed this even as a proposed resolution regarding the development of the property owned by the National Housing Authority (NHA) was filed before the city council.

In the proposal, Councilors Jesus Manuel Suntay and Marivic Co-Pilar asked their peers to approve a resolution that will allow Bautista to enter into a joint venture agreement with the NHA.

“The Quezon City government and the (NHA) are committed and actively participating as partners in providing resettlement to (informal settler families),” read the proposed measure.

It noted that the NHA is the owner of the 69,759-square meter property that was formerly occupied by the MSBF.

Nation ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1
The details on the joint venture have yet to be released. However, the councilors said the Urban Development Act of 1992 has tasked the NHA to provide assistance to the local government in implementing its housing programs.

NHA general manager Chito Cruz has yet to respond to requests for interview regarding the matter.

The city took control of the property and demolished the structures built by its occupants last year after claiming that the MSBF failed to pay real property taxes to the city government.

No to integrated terminal

Earlier, the Department of Transportation and Communications said they are considering the site as a possible location of an integrated transport terminal, similar to the one in Pasay City.

But according to Endriga, they are not keen on agreeing to such proposal since they have already come up with studies for the development of the Philippine Diamond Tower, which would be the second highest self-supported tower in the world next to Japan’s Tokyo Sky Free (634 meters).

When compared to tallest buildings in the world, its height would be next to Burj Khalifa in Dubai (828 meters) and Shanghai Tower in China (632 meters). It would be taller than the Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel in Saudi Arabia (601 meters) and the One World Trade Center in New York (541.3 meters).

In addition to telecommunications, Endriga said the tower will also be used for disaster risk reduction. He also admitted that a number of land developers are already in talks with the local government for the development of the other parts of the property.

He said they are looking into the possible development of hotels, shopping areas and parks in the area.

The official said the development could be a public-private partnership, and maintained that it would be beneficial for the local government and its residents as it would provide jobs and increase revenue.

He also assured safety of the proposed tower, saying they already surveyed the sturdiness of the soil and confirmed that the area is not prone to earthquakes.

“We hope to develop something that could be a pride of every Filipino,” he said.

-----

Phl’s tallest structure to rise in QC | Metro, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com

----

This will be the second attempt of the PH to build a really high tower because the last one (PAGCOR Tower) went to bust as it was located in the area where airplane descent due to being in the area where the main airport (NAIA) and its potential replacement (Sangley Point) are located...and a group here in the PH rejected the idea of building a Vegas-style "amusement" area in which this tower is part of the project.
 
Last edited:
.
the willing to reform is the key, the needs of weapons is largely depend on your perception of threat and what kind of doctrine your armed forces to adopt. Basically, without knowing the essence of why some weapons is made you cannot utilize them to the full extent of their potential uses.

As an examples, the formation of Ph Marine forces today is largely composed of infantry soldiers with not withstanding amphibious armored units, without adequate infantry fire support and the most important your Navy doesn't have adequate Naval unit to protect your Marines and doesn't have any means to landing your marine forces into the shore of their intended target . But as far as i can see, the Ph Marine forces is still trying to adopt a similar way and similar doctrinal combined in arms approach of the US Marines forces as part of US Marines forces legacy had into your Marine forces.

Thus with the minimum resources you had today and doctrinal approach you had, we can deduct what the most important thing the Ph Marines right now urgently needed.

1. Your Marine need a necessary platform to doing some amphibious landing operation, thus we need an LPD or LST first, then you need Landing Craft Tank and RHIB to bring your marine forces ashore.
2. Your Marine need a necessary support from your Navy to protect their Landing Ship Platform when conduct an operation, thus your Frigate acquisition programme actually is an urgent need. But Pohang class corvette grants will give you some minor rest
3. Your marine need amphibious armored unit to giving some level of protection and firepower for the first wave of landing operation, IMHO AAV7A is actually a preferred choice over BMP-3F given the urgent need to bring more squad units with their own firepower for the first landing unit. Actually Ph more needed a battle taxi than an IFV today.
4. Your marines need more firepower by giving more infantry fire support to the arms, thus by giving more artillery unit to Ph Marines you can deliver more punch to your adversary.

that's all i want to say, and for the portable infantry weapons, anything you has mentioned above is a capable and combat tested weapons platform.

Sir we do have armored forces and artillery units in the PMC but the formation is small because that is what the navy wanted as standing forces of the Marines and we are geting the AAV7 vechicles and other equipment and other military items remember we are buying items from Indonesia or SSVs and other military suppliers but we following a listdue to the new modernization law and credible defense program so we have to wait.
 
. . .
Sir we do have armored forces and artillery units in the PMC but the formation is small because that is what the navy wanted as standing forces of the Marines and we are geting the AAV7 vechicles and other equipment and other military items remember we are buying items from Indonesia or SSVs and other military suppliers but we following a listdue to the new modernization law and credible defense program so we have to wait.

Well the armored forces of the PH Marine Corps consists of V-150s, LVTH-6 and LAV-300 but I think this are just light...and I mean too-light. I may have to agree with madokafc about the need of more amphibious transports and air-support platforms with the eight AAVP-7s being acquire as the first step, however we need should buy another 8 more while have vehicles like BMP-3 or other vehicles to replace the LAV-300 and LVTH-6 for fire support. We should also consider rocket artillery/MLRS-type artillery for the Marines such as the Brazilian Astros II MLRS as the Army already has too much armor and heavy weapons once the procured weapons arrive.

As for the Simba APCs we have, me thinks it is better to have those relegated to roles done by Humvees though I am not sure if the Simba APC can withstand IEDs like the MRAP vehicles.
 
Last edited:
.
Two persons were hurt after a Sokol helicopter carrying an Army general and providing escort to Cabinet officials

Sokol helicopter crashes in Marawi; 2 hurt

By Roel Pareño and Alexis Romero (The Philippine Star) | Updated August 8, 2014 - 12:00am

helicopter-crash-7.jpg


MANILA, Philippines - Two persons were hurt after a Sokol helicopter carrying an Army general and providing escort to Cabinet officials crashed in Marawi City yesterday.

Army division spokesman Capt. Franco Suelto said the pilot managed to maneuver the ill-fated helicopter and saved 11 passengers, including Maj. Gen. Ricardo Visaya, chief of the 4th Army Division; 4th Infantry Division Inspector-General Col. Alexander Macario, five staff members of Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin and four crew members, including the two pilots.

Injured were Staff Sergeant Darius Valdez, crew of the Sokol 921 and Santiago Savedra, a bystander who was hit by debris during the crash.

The helicopter crashed at 2:23 p.m. shortly after takeoff from the 103rd Infantry Brigade headquarters in Marawi City.

“The Sokol helicopter barely took off when the incident happened. It was fortunate that the pilot managed to maneuver and made a forced landing,” Suelto said.

The helicopter, a backup for another Sokol carrying Gazmin, Interior Secretary Manuel Roxas II and Energy Secretary Jericho Petilla, reportedly lost control after it was buffeted by heavy winds.

“As a result of the crash, one crew from the chopper was wounded in action while another civilian was injured,” Armed Forces public affairs chief Lt. Col. Ramon Zagala said.

The helicopters were en route to Cagayan de Oro City.

The other Sokol carrying the Cabinet officials arrived safely at the Langundingan Airport in Cagayan de Oro.

Armed Forces chief Gen. Gregorio Catapang has ordered Air Force chief Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Delgado to determine the cause of the accident.

Visaya said he was in Marawi City to accompany Gazmin, Roxas and Petilla as they try to solve the power problems in the area.

He said the helicopter appeared to have difficulty flying around two to three minutes after it took off, at about 15 meters above ground.

“The helicopter turned left and then crashed. It did not explode so no one among us died,” Visaya said.

Suelto added the helicopter that crashed was among the eight Sokol delivered in 2012 to the Philippine Air Force. – With Cecille Suerte Felipe, Edith Regalado

Sokol helicopter crashes in Marawi; 2 hurt | Headlines, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com


BubnSfCCAAAnlcz.jpg:small

Bugp_4JCUAATYAT.jpg:small
 
Last edited:
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom