Philippine Warship in Standoff With China Vessels

[amidamaru]

China Philippines




why?for what reason?why not ask US to do this to China instead.

Total Population: 313,232,044 [2011]
Available Manpower: 145,212,012 [2011]
Fit for Service: 120,022,084 [2011]
Of Military Age: 4,217,412 [2011]
Active Military: 1,477,896 [2011]
Active Reserve: 1,458,500 [2011]


LAND ARMY

Total Land Weapons: 56,269
Tanks: 9,573 [2011]
APCs / IFVs: 26,653 [2011]
Towed Artillery: 2,163 [2011]
SPGs: 950 [2011]
MLRSs: 1,430 [2011]
Mortars: 7,500 [2011]
AT Weapons: 8,000 [2011]
AA Weapons: 2,106 [2011]
Logistical Vehicles: 267,247

AIR POWER

Total Aircraft: 18,234 [2011]
Helicopters: 6,417 [2011]
Serviceable Airports: 15,097 [

NAVAL POWER

Total Navy Ships: 2,384
Merchant Marine Strength: 418 [2011]
Major Ports & Terminals: 21
Aircraft Carriers: 11 [2011]
Destroyers: 59 [2011]
Submarines: 75 [2011]
Frigates: 30 [2011]
Patrol Craft: 12 [2011]
Mine Warfare Craft: 14 [2011]
Amphibious Assault Craft: 30 [2011


REALLY wanna play boys?

 

[beijingwalker]

Total Population: 313,232,044 [2011]
Available Manpower: 145,212,012 [2011]
Fit for Service: 120,022,084 [2011]
Of Military Age: 4,217,412 [2011]
Active Military: 1,477,896 [2011]
Active Reserve: 1,458,500 [2011]


LAND ARMY

Total Land Weapons: 56,269
Tanks: 9,573 [2011]
APCs / IFVs: 26,653 [2011]
Towed Artillery: 2,163 [2011]
SPGs: 950 [2011]
MLRSs: 1,430 [2011]
Mortars: 7,500 [2011]
AT Weapons: 8,000 [2011]
AA Weapons: 2,106 [2011]
Logistical Vehicles: 267,247

AIR POWER

Total Aircraft: 18,234 [2011]
Helicopters: 6,417 [2011]
Serviceable Airports: 15,097 [

NAVAL POWER

Total Navy Ships: 2,384
Merchant Marine Strength: 418 [2011]
Major Ports & Terminals: 21
Aircraft Carriers: 11 [2011]
Destroyers: 59 [2011]
Submarines: 75 [2011]
Frigates: 30 [2011]
Patrol Craft: 12 [2011]
Mine Warfare Craft: 14 [2011]
Amphibious Assault Craft: 30 [2011


REALLY wanna play boys?

if my memory serves my right,did we play in Korea and Vietnam before?Austrilians want to do it again?

 

[amidamaru]

im sure we will back usa, and of course so will the UK and France, new zealand, philippines, vietnam, Japan,South korea..

things are not looking good for your side lol

 

[beijingwalker]

im sure we will back usa, and of course so will the UK and France, new zealand, philippines, vietnam, Japan,South korea..

things are not looking good for your side lol

haha,then ask them do it,dont just talk,like your prime ministers always do.

Kevin Rudd says China to rule the world

PAUL TOOHEY
The Sunday Telegraph
January 15, 2012 12:00AM

KEVIN Rudd has predicted China will overtake the US as the world's biggest economy by decade's end - but says there is nothing to fear in that.

The Foreign Minister addressed the Asia Society in New York yesterday and said whilespite China had problems with poverty and human rights suppression, there was no evidence it would face an Arab Spring or was looking at the collapse of communist rule.

And he told the rest of the world to accept that fact.

Mr Rudd was introduced to the Asia Society by former World Bank president James Wolfensohn who told the crowd: "All Australians are very proud of him".

Mr Rudd said while China was not joining the Asian trend to democracy, it wasn't intruding into other countries.

"There is nothing, repeat nothing, inevitable about some form of Sino-American conflict in the future," Mr Rudd said."Such conflict would undermine all our interests, and in all probability betray our most fundamental values."

Mr Rudd said China's rise to the top of the global economic ladder was almost complete, if not already there.

China owns $2 trillion in foreign assets while the US owes $2 trillion in foreign debt.

"This will be the first time since the rise of the Spanish Empire 500 years ago that a non-Western power will be the dominant global economic power," he said.

"It is therefore a subject worthy of the most serious reflection and analysis, not just in Beijing and Washington, but across Asia, across Europe and across the world."

He said Australia's location meant it had felt the winds of change coming from China before many other nations.

Despite China's active charming of nations in Australia's immediate region, Mr Rudd argued China was not exporting ideology as part of its international relations program.Instead, it was using its influence on the widespread Chinese diaspora to help build the motherland economically.

But nor did China seek to import Western ideology, and would continue to decline to be held to account for this.

Mr Rudd, who speaks Mandarin and has studied China for 35 years, said it was grounded in Chinese philosophy to seek harmony and avoid chaos.

He said China wanted global peace so it could grow its own economy and enjoy a better life - better than the mass deprivations of the past.

"At the same time, China's leadership seeks to lift international prestige as a proud people with arguably the oldest continuing civilisation on Earth," he said.

Kevin Rudd says China to rule the world | thetelegraph.com.au

 

[amidamaru]

haha,then ask them do it,dont just talk,like your prime ministers always do.

we will, and have done so many times before... i dont think it would require much talk at all actually...

not many countries in asia like china .. specially since china thinks it owns everything, including their sovereign territories!

all the countries above would join together in a full scale war if it occured, because if by some miracle, china was able to hold off the usa... they would most definitely be targets in the future... they already are anyway... so why would they sit back and do nothing?? that would be stupid.. and u would be stupid to think china has any real chance against all those countries




oh btw.. kevin rudd didnt give it the meaning you are talking about, he said they would be the number 1 economy... that is of course if china is not stupid enough to start a massive war in the meantime.... do you really think the usa will allow china to be dominant over them militarily or technologically?? think again

 

[beijingwalker]

we will, and have done so many times before... i dont think it would require much talk at all actually...

not many countries in asia like china .. specially since china thinks it owns everything, including their sovereign territories!

all the countries above would join together in a full scale war if it occured, because if by some miracle, china was able to hold off the usa... they would most definitely be targets in the future... they already are anyway... so why would they sit back and do nothing?? that would be stupid.. and u would be stupid to think china has any real chance against all those countries




oh btw.. kevin rudd didnt give it the meaning you are talking about, he said they would be the number 1 economy... that is of course if china is not stupid enough to start a massive war in the meantime.... do you really think the usa will allow china to be dominant over them militarily or technologically?? think again

haha,so we are going to see your Aussies lead this battle against China?but i only see your government do the otherwise.

 

[amidamaru]

haha,so we are going to see your Aussies lead this battle against China?but i only see your government do the otherwise.

who said anything about that??? we wouldnt need to lead a battle.. simple fact is, if you go to war with our allies, we will all join forces against your arrogant and idiotic government/country.

and really.. signs are showing of chinas true intent... however your view of yourselves, at this point in time you are still retards in a superman outfit... dangerous?? yes, hence why we will all hit the snake on the head together. obviously every country will base its operations around the usa.

 

[beijingwalker]

who said anything about that??? we wouldnt need to lead a battle.. simple fact is, if you go to war with our allies, we will all join forces against your arrogant and idiotic government/country.

and really.. signs are showing of chinas true intent... however your view of yourselves, at this point in time you are still retards in a superman outfit... dangerous?? yes, hence why we will all hit the snake on the head together. obviously every country will base its operations around the usa.

you sound like you are somebody in your country,haha.talking is cheap.come and try us.

 

[SinoChallenger]

It's not an international water, but Philippines EEZ.


Palau police shot and killed the Chinese fishing boat captain and China didn't protest. China won't do anything if this boat's captain is shot and killed too, so Philippines may open fire within its EEZ if the Chinese fishing boat resists detainment.

If shooting is not enough, ramming also works well. Make sure to aim for the propeller so the Chinese boat can't flee.

LOL at Korean inferiority. That sounds like a good idea until China launches multimegaton yield nukes on manila. Just like North Korea stands ready to pump every single Seoul resident full of nerve gas and germ weapons.

 

[SinoChallenger]

I think other countries affected by China's aggressive stance should also take part in the games to thumb a nose at them.

Two pools could consist of...

Pool A

India
Vietnam
Philippines
Taiwan

Pool B

Japan
Malaysia
Indonesia
Russia

Referees: USA and Australia

Cheers!

LOL Taiwan already surrendered to China. How many of these countries would be willing to absorb a multimegaton nuclear strike on their capital cities to contain China? Who is going to come to indias help when our nukes detonate over red fort?

 

[amidamaru]

you sound like you are somebody in your country,haha.talking is cheap.come and try us.

i didnt say it would be easy, but it would be extremely hard for you guys too... your stupid if you think you really stand a good chance at those odds

 

[beijingwalker]

i didnt say it would be easy, but it would be extremely hard for you guys too... your stupid if you think you really stand a good chance at those odds

we did it in 1974 and 1988,and we took back many islands during those two wars.now we are much stronger than those years.

 

[帅的一匹]

It's not an international water, but Philippines EEZ.


Palau police shot and killed the Chinese fishing boat captain and China didn't protest. China won't do anything if this boat's captain is shot and killed too, so Philippines may open fire within its EEZ if the Chinese fishing boat resists detainment.

If shooting is not enough, ramming also works well. Make sure to aim for the propeller so the Chinese boat can't flee.

Your coast guard was drowned when he boarded our fishing boat at 2008, what a idiot.

 

[SinoChallenger]

Just look at the location of Scarborough Shoal. Why the fck should this belong to China and not Philippines?

Because China has multimegaton nuclear weapons and we can remove our manila completely.

 

[amidamaru]

we did it in 1974 and 1988,and we took back many islands during those two wars.now we are much stronger than those years.

ohh yeh you took on the usa and its allies full might and won did you? lol

back then you were still partly insignificant... these days it is a different story, any type of war has broad ramifications worldwide, specially in sth east asia... you cannot compare.