Nilu Pule
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2018
- Messages
- 3,953
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
There was no Bharat for past 5000 years..kashmir bharat ka abhinna ang hai from the last 5000 years .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was no Bharat for past 5000 years..kashmir bharat ka abhinna ang hai from the last 5000 years .
Bro I get what you mean , that's for current security situation, in the case of a cease fire and truce , kashmiri would = kashmiri, kashmiri can travel to India and pak freely, Indian cannot travel to pak freely pak cannot travel to India freely, that was what was announced,
Obviously when both sides in good faith declare cease fire and importantly truce, distrust would end and leave will begin and rise of a subcontinental economic bloc of 2 nuclear nations with large industries,
Yet if only the Indians agreed to this, why does India even cling on to Kashmir? It seems insignificant considering the size of India
There was no Bharat for past 5000 years..
Another dumb bhaiyya!jab se tha tab se kashmir bharat ka abhinn ang hai .
Another dumb bhaiyya!
I bet you chant ''Bharat Mata ki Jai" every morning
Kashmir belongs to her inhabitants not you, BJP or any other party. Just because you have half a million armed occupiers doesn't make it YOUR land.
There was no Bharat for past 5000 years..
If you need half a million number for 200 odd militants i agree with you that you might need more men and material now.By now Indian troops level in Kashmir would have crossed 1.5 million given turbulence in Kashmir since India needed 7 lakh troops to hold Kashmir during peace time.
Comprehension problems or occupier's delusion. Land belongs to the people if they want to stay they should if they don't land still belong to them !Now we could say the same that just because a small bunch of people chose to adopt a different ideology does not mean that the land goes away with them.
Comprehension problems or occupier's delusion. Land belongs to the people if they want to stay they should if they don't land still belong to them !
it wil be great choice to make them a free country . south Asian concept of dharti maan and unchangeable countries is pure BS bakwaas
buddy you dont kashmir then first they will be a state border with india pakistan china afghanistan and very close to tajikistan . no2 they have so much of potential of mining of precious stones .third they have tourism and water . it will be soon rich country at least now Pakistani kashmir is more rich well and educated place .They'll not survive. If independent, it will be a landlocked country with no real industry, mining etc. They'll be heavily dependent on India/Pak ...hence will not be true sovereign...their politics will be a battleground between India/Pak...
To me there is no solution as of now for Kashmir...we'll have to wait till India becomes too strong to be fiddled with and Pak compromises, or Pak becomes too strong to snatch it from India....Local population on it's own cannot do much
Assuming too much about me or this is your muslim hating sanghi coming out?Why do you cry so much about an imaginary palestinian state?
Kashmir Bharat ka kia haikashmir bharat ka abhinna ang hai from the last 5000 years .
Assuming too much about me or this is your muslim hating sanghi coming out?
All type of shit always pisses off a normal human being can't say about you or sanghis !The Sangh really pisses you off doesn't it?