Desert Fox
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 10,584
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
1) show me where in the natural wilderness two rival lions peacefully coexisting1. Actually, yes, lmao. Two lions can coexist in the same den.
Two superpowers can also coexist in a region, example is Russia and China.
And two stars do also coexist in the same galaxy, they're called double star systems.
2) Russia and China's "coexistence" is contigent on their rivalry with another superpower, ie United States. Ever heard of the Sino-Soviet rivalry in the Communist bloc? Thanks for proving my point
3) yeah two stars coexist in a galaxy without any intelligent lifeform which proves my earlier point:
"There is only one God, because LOGIC dictates that if there were more than one God, then we wouldn't exist because more than one and equally powerful gods would constantly be at war or competition with each other and something as consistent and complimentary as the natural environment and intelligent creation wouldn't be able to exist in such a chaotic environment."
Unfortunately I have to resort to such examples to declutter your illogical liberal secular infested mind. Seems like no progress is being made.And we're talking about something which is intelligent, you can't equate a 'God' to something as stupid as a lion, or to something as inanimate as a star.
No they're not and this isn't logical for reasons I have already explained and will not bother to repeat if you failed to comprehend the most basic logical facts of reality.Logically speaking, two 'Gods' can indeed exist cooperatively, or non cooperatively. Both scenarios exist and 'logically' are plausible. And this is the issue with this belief, and lack of rigority in it.
Also, learn the 99 names of Allah, he is al-Wahid, The One and Only.
Yeah, like sure Pakistan has a Khalifa and is not a Nation State or a Republic (both secular concepts) and all of its present and past leaders were graduates of Al-Azhar university right?2. Pakistan is not here as a result of secular, or liberal, domination. For nearly the entirety of its history, its people, its law, and its narrative has been heavily influenced by religion.
. My question is that why must we force the much-more restrictive religious defintion of morality on each person
Because man-made morality leads to millions of people being starved to death, nukes dropped in civilians, chemical and biological testing on live targets, and sex with animals being made permissable.
What is it with your fixation on embarrassing yourself trying to rationalize the irrational (Liberal Secularism)??