Is there a culture in the forces that lead's to this issue or our own culture in the whole country or a mix of both?
Or maybe it's the time's or the atmosphere
This is the same period or a year or two after
Ayub Khan pretty much said racist things about every ethnicity in Pak except probably his own, like old school, wild type a racist crap you'd hear in 50s US (not taking away from the fact that he was an able leader)
My family, who have served and continue to serve since partition, said it was the atmosphere and feeling of superiority. One relative pointed to the below quote from Ayub Khan's book to show the mindset of the "elites" in West Pakistan, not the general population.
3 (a) The people of Pakistan consist of a variety of races each with its own historical background and culture. East Bengalis, who constitute the bulk of the population, probably belong to the very original Indian races. It would be no exaggeration to say that up to the creation of Pakistan, they had not known any real freedom or sovereignty. They have been in turn ruled either by the caste Hindus, Moghuls, Pathans, or the British. In addition, they have been and still are under considerable Hindu cultural and linguistic influence. As such they have all the inhibitions of downtrodden races and have not yet found it possible to adjust psychologically to the requirements of the new-born freedom. Their popular complexes, exclusiveness, suspicion and a sort of defensive aggressiveness probably emerge from this historical background. Prudence, therefore, demands that these factors should be recognized and catered for and they be helped so as to feel equal partners and prove an asset. That can be done only if they are given a considerable measure of partnership,
Page 193 of 263
Microsoft Word - Cover.docx (sanipanhwar.com)
What I find comical about Ayub Khan and others is how he says they have not known "any real freedom or sovereignty" had he an ounce of the brain functioning correctly just 23 years back, you were a colony with no absolute freedom or sovereignty either. Worse yet, he was serving the sovereign crown under the British Indian flag, a sad case of white sir leaving and brown sir taking its place. He was the true definition of a house negro of South Asia.
Overall, he wasn't an able leader or administrator, he first brought the religious card to use against Fatima Jinnah, and we've seen the treatment that was meted out to the nation's mother. He was a failure like all those after him. But that is a whole different discussion.
Last edited: