roadrunner
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,696
- Reaction score
- 0
That's the first part of the of the resolution you quoted. It says that the commission must notify the Indian Government of the withdrawal of troops and tribesmen... which clearly you never withdrew, and hence, the rest of the resolution could never go ahead...
This has been discussed before on the UN resolution thread of Kashmir.
It's very clear there.
I'll repeat for you.
The Commision (UNCIP) was notified that Pakistani troops were being withdrawn. How do I know this, you ask? Well, India was asked to withdraw its troops down to 18,000, but it refused. It said it needed 24,000 troops to maintain order. This is where the process broke down. There is a resolution stating this.
Therefore UNCIP were notified, since India was asked to agree to withdraw. a had to happen before b, it's a process that is one way.
Now, if you interpret that as a mistake on India's part, you are either very deluded or don't know English... considering you are Pakistani, I think it is the former rather than the latter....
It's not just me. It's me and everyone who can speak English. It's even the head of UNCIP, the UN chief that stated it was India that halted the process of demilitarization in Kashmir.
“None of these suggestions commended themselves to the Prime Minister of India. In the end, I became convinced that India’s agreement would never be obtained to demilitarization in any such form, or to provisions governing the period of the plebiscite of any such character, as would in my opinion permit the plebiscite being conducted in conditions sufficiently guarding against intimidation and other forms of influence and abuse by which the freedom and fairness of the plebiscite might be imperiled.”[ - Sir Owen Dixon, head of UNCIP.
The head of the UN team overlooking the Kashmir issue stated it was your fault. Here it is for you again?
"“None of these suggestions commended themselves to the Prime Minister of India. In the end, I became convinced that India’s agreement would never be obtained to demilitarization in any such form, or to provisions governing the period of the plebiscite of any such character, as would in my opinion permit the plebiscite being conducted in conditions sufficiently guarding against intimidation and other forms of influence and abuse by which the freedom and fairness of the plebiscite might be imperiled.”[
Now was Sir Owen Dixon also deluded?
Before all of this, Pakistan was supposed to remove the tribesmen it had ILLEGALLY planted into Kashmir, which it did not do... so this stage of the process was never reached...
Pakistan was not supposed to remove ALL the tribesmen. The phrase used in the UN resolution (you've quoted it above) is:
"The Government of Pakistan will use its best endeavour to secure the withdrawal from theState of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistan nationals not normally resident thereinwho have entered the State for the purpose of fighting."
-Best endeavour. And the UN agreed it was a best endeavour since the process fo demilitarization was continued and India asked to withdraw its troops.
Who the heck is this "WE" ??? You and your band of self-styled, half-frenzied crony merry-men ???
If I, or we, are so crazy, why hasn't a single Indian been able to answer why India refused to reduce its troop numbers down to 18,000?
If it's so crazy, why did the head of UNCIP blame India for the failure of the demilitarization process?
Last edited: