Ok baba, India freed Kashmir from Pakistan in 1947(I used clerics so that it sounds like India interfering in an internal issue). If you are hurt, add another point to the list. Pakistan tried to 'free' Kashmir from the king's forces(You will agree with this and it will match my criterion of meddling). Btw unselfish is also a legitimate word. I didn't want to use the same word twice in the post.
You seem to have missed the point. It's not about the details of each case. The details will depend on who you ask. It is irrelevant, whom the outsider selflessly 'freed' the people from. It is plain intervention to interfere in another people's affairs. And if it not for self-defence it's declared intention is always to 'help' and 'free' the people. The same way colonialists 'felt' it was their 'duty' to 'help' us(Read White man's burden). BTW Communists genuinely thought they were gifting the occupied people like Tibetans and Afghans with their ideology. A common American genuinely thinks he liberated the people of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
My only questions are: Why do you think you are better than them? Why do you think the people cannot help themselves?