What's new

People are asking for Jinnah`s Pakistan

T-Faz

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Messages
4,962
Reaction score
1
KARACHI, Jan 20: A grandnephew of Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah called on Thursday for rebuilding Pakistan as a “democratic state”, where there was supremacy of the constitution, independence of the judiciary, protection of the minorities and non-involvement of religion in state affairs, as was envisioned by the Quaid.

Liaquat A. Merchant, a senior lawyer and president of the Jinnah Society, was delivering a lecture titled “Is Jinnah relevant in Pakistan today?” at the Aga Khan University auditorium.

He said we have drifted away from the vision of the Quaid-i-Azam and the people were asking for “Jinnah`s Pakistan” as the country has moved closer to a shortlist of failed states.

He said this country was created with the power of pen, power of speech and power of vote. It had been ruled for almost half of its existence by the power of the sword by dictatorial regimes which abrogated the constitution, put it in abeyance and mutilated it by constitutional deviations and supra-constitutional measures while politicians aided and abetted them.

Mr Merchant said it was not uncommon for the courts of law to uphold these regimes under the doctrine of necessity and welfare of the people.

He said we fought three wars with India and lost half of the country when we should have put our legal, political and diplomatic skills to work to solve our disputes and political bickering, intrigues and machinations.

“We disregarded the principles of equality and tolerance and failed to achieve unity in diversity and discipline in our ranks,” he said. “We may have achieved a measure of political independence but economic independence still remains a much desired necessity in Pakistan.”

He said Pakistan was not achieved by strikes and satyagrah , not by mischievous machinations; not by revolt and rebellion. “It was achieved by an awakening of the Muslims by Jinnah that this nation came into being,” he said. The struggle for Pakistan, he added, was at all times legal and constitutional. The power of pen proved to be stronger than the sword`s. The freedom of expression, he said, resulted in dissemination of news and Muslims received the benefit of educated Muslim opinion on matters of great importance. They used their pen and power to vote and supported Jinnah and the Muslim League.

A nation born so, he emphasised, had democracy ingrained in its creation and therefore ingrained in the minds and hearts of the citizens.

“If our leaders and governments had placed emphasis on education and literacy, democratic traditions would have taken hold in a much stronger way,” he said. “When people have a feeling of despondency and despair, it is not because democracy has failed but because their leaders have failed them and not allowed true democracy to flourish in Pakistan.”


Mr Merchant said: “We need to have our political leaders recognise the fact that they are elected representatives and not rulers. The government has to be controlled by public opinion based upon the freedom of speech and expression and reflected in the media.

“Opposition parties must play a constructive role and not merely oppose to frustrate policies of the government.”

`Gandhi wanted to visit Pakistan`

He cited extensively from historical documents on Jinnah`s views and said that Rajmohan Gandhi, grandson of Gandhi, said that Mahatma Gandhi had agreed to visit Pakistan in early 1948 but was assassinated before he could do so. Perhaps if Gandhi had undertaken this visit, the disputes and differences between India and Pakistan would have been resolved, he said.

Through his speech and visual presentation, Mr Merchant reminded the audience of the Quaid-i-Azam`s strong belief in democracy and a representative government, his confidence in the supremacy of the rule of law, his faith in the freedom of speech and the protection of human rights. Though it was a misfortune to lose Jinnah merely one year after the creation of Pakistan, he is the figure around whom “Pakistanis can rally to achieve national unity and progress in the modern world”.

Mr Merchant reminded the audience that if this country was to be “Jinnah`s Pakistan”, there was a need to revisit and recover the Quaid`s vision for this nation.

The talk was followed by a lively a question-answer session.

`People are asking for Jinnah`s Pakistan` | Latest news, Breaking news, Pakistan News, World news, business, sport and multimedia | DAWN.COM
 
. .
his death was untimely but he and his vision will never be forgotten by those who are not deviates/hypocrites/ingrates
 
.
we seriously lack leadership , a leadership who can gather pakistanis on a common platform which is Jinnahs Pakistan ....
 
.
‘Jinnah’s Pakistan’ is not dead



In recent weeks, several commentators have dwelt upon the amorphous notion of ‘Jinnah’s Pakistan’, challenging its notional contours and exposing its overt ideological underpinnings. Whilst such a debate is healthy in a democratic society, it becomes a worrying sign in a deeply polarised polity such as Pakistan. Jinnah’s Pakistan was no consensus project: It had several dissenters — from the religious right to the Khudai Khidmatgars in the northwest. Perhaps these problematic foundations led to the capture of the state by a national security paradigm, later bolstered by the Islamist discourse.

Blaming Jinnah’s Pakistan as a cause or manifestation of the ideological chaos rooted in our perennial identity question is simply disingenuous. Jinnah may have said different things at different occasions but his views as head of the state are what matter. It was not Jinnah alone who created Pakistan. The politico-economic interests of nascent ‘Muslim’ bourgeoisie and the famous salariat (to use Hamza Alavi’s term) were the prime causes of Pakistan’s creation. Jinnah nearly gave up the idea of a separate state in 1946 after accepting the Cabinet Mission proposals (the best possible compromise to retain Indian unity). Many critiques of Jinnah overlook the ‘intransigence’ of the Indian National Congress, documented by HM Seervai. Sadly, both India and Pakistan have buried the fairly objective view of Seervai, as particularistic nation state narratives are always threatened by objectivity.

In spite of the horrors unleashed by Partition, Jinnah insisted on a US-Canada type relationship between India and Pakistan with, open and permeable borders; and even wanted to retire in his beloved city, Bombay. However, he died too early and Gandhi, while fasting for the rights of Pakistanis, was killed by an Hindu extremist (note the absence of this fact in the Indian discourse — Hindutva terror started with Gandhi’s assassination).

India was soon taken over by its political-bureaucratic machinery and Pakistan’s security forces took direct control of power. Such appropriation of Pakistani political space could only work if the Indian ‘threat’ was amplified to alarming proportions. Consequently, the entire country became a fortress, defending itself from reason, with ‘religion’ painted on its entrance. Did Jinnah envisage or wish such a polity? No, he warned against it.

Jinnah had a sense of Indian unity above the newly formed states of ‘Pakistan and Hindustan’. American scholar William Metz noted in his 1952 doctoral thesis (University of Pennsylvania), that for Jinnah, a Hindu-Muslim settlement was itself a form of Hindu-Muslim unity.

Recounting history is important today. The religious zealots who are silencing voices of tolerance did not believe in Jinnah’s Pakistan. They wanted a pan-Islamic theocracy — what al Qaeda wants Pakistan to become in 2011. Pakistan is a reality but its viability is once again linked to Jinnah’s post-June 1947 vision entailing: a) a secular state, b) resistance to calls for theocracy, and c) a US-Canada model for India-Pakistan relations.

Jinnah’s Pakistan is not dead: Millions of Pakistanis who want a tolerant homeland resent its creeping radicalisation. If not Jinnah, what else do we have to counter the armed extremism on the Pakistani street? If we have drifted too far, which we have, then all the more reason to reclaim the ideal. Denouncing Jinnah’s vision, ironically, reinforces the national security paradigm as well as the Indian nationalist narratives. I hope Pakistani ‘liberals’ are aware of that.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2011.
 
.
It will be a big blow to India if Pakistan becomes a Secular State....I do not want to tell why but people with some sense knows it too well.
 
.
It will be a big blow to India if Pakistan becomes a Secular State....I do not want to tell why but people with some sense knows it too well.

Exactly, this wouldn't please the Arabs too much either.

After all having a dependent mercenary is much better than having a nation who is vying for regional leadership.
 
. .
This is commonly said by all to everyone, whereas what they really are forgetting is they are the ones who can make a change! I am desperatley trying it. According to what I experience, no one actually cares, but just says to bring back Jinnah's Pakistan and the Pakistan we all sacrifised for, but what they are forgetting is they are the ones on whom the Nation is depending!

Here is a video from my so called 'facebook campaign'.

Videos Posted by Mega campaign for general Awarness Pakistan (MCA): The story of the boy. | Facebook


Regards!
 
. . .
First & the foremost someone has to nurture the idea upto the masses that Jinnah was a Muslim!! Surprised aren't you ....

I have seen some senior teachers/thinkers who are of view that a pipe-smoking & white-leather wearing personality ain't fit with the Islamic traditions of simplicity & devout.
 
.
First & the foremost someone has to nurture the idea upto the masses that Jinnah was a Muslim!! Surprised aren't you ....

I have seen some senior teachers/thinkers who are of view that a pipe-smoking & white-leather wearing personality ain't fit with the Islamic traditions of simplicity & devout.

Yeah there are discussion about his eating and drinking habits too. But we should leave that topic in this thread.

This thread is about his thinking not appearance, lifestyle etc.
 
.
Not my problem but why do you call it Jinnah's pakistan, it is muslims pakistan, created for muslims of sub-continent where they can live. Jinnah played a key role in creation but it is muslims who need to decide how to live whether they want democracy or sharia. The thing is whenever some crap happens, I get to see 10's of thousands coming out asking for someone's head and many thousand advocating peace and human rights. Pakistan was not made in name of Jinnah it was made in name of islam, now pay for it.

Similarly India was not made for nehru/gandhi philosophy,it is Indians who need to decide what to do. You cant keep living in history all the time.

It will be a big blow to India if Pakistan becomes a Secular State....I do not want to tell why but people with some sense knows it too well.

How ? Because then they will work on economy and prosper ? Or that once complete secularism will come in, then Indians can expect reduction is islamic terroism from the other side. Only problem Indians have with pakistan is number of terrorist attacks, I guess Indians care more about terrorism than caring how pakistan is doing economically.
 
.
Btw I see many pakistanis debating on blasmephy laws, for those who have secular view their viewpoint can be understood but those who want an islamic one, whats their stand on core sharia laws as in KSA and Iran and do they think Jizya be imposed in remaining non-muslims of pakistan to make the land 99.99% pak ?

Ofcourse you are not pleasing allah by letting kaafirs live there without a jizya :P
 
.
Back
Top Bottom