What's new

Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar

MehrotraPrince

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar

The US Department of Defense is lowering the performance bar for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter according to a new report by the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation (***&E).

The specifications for all three variants pertaining to transonic acceleration and sustained turn rates have been reduced. Worst hit in terms of acceleration is the US Navy's F-35C carrier-based model.

"The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35C, reducing turn performance from 5.1 to 5.0 sustained g's and increasing the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by at least 43 seconds," reads the report prepared by J Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's ***&E. "These changes were due to the results of air vehicle performance and flying qualities evaluations."

The US Air Force F-35A's time has slipped by eight seconds while the US Marine Corps short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B's time has slipped by 16 seconds. However, turn rates for both the A and B models have been impacted more severely than the USN variant. Sustained turning performance for the F-35B is being reduced from 5G to 4.5G while the F-35A sinks from 5.3G to 4.6G according to the report.

"It was a judgement call," Schwartz said. "And not an unreasonable one."

In May 2011, Flightglobal reported that the conventional take-off and landing F-35A's combat radius had dropped to 1,080km, or about 11km short of the requirement. The combat radius for the other two F-35 variants had also declined, but remained above their minimum thresholds.

The range was reduced after Pratt & Whitney diverted more bleed air from the F135 powerplant for cooling purposes. The USAF also accepted new estimates that reduced the F-35A's fuel capacity and added the weight and drag of the Lockheed electro-optical targeting system.

Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar
 
.
Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar

The US Department of Defense is lowering the performance bar for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter according to a new report by the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation (***&E).

The specifications for all three variants pertaining to transonic acceleration and sustained turn rates have been reduced. Worst hit in terms of acceleration is the US Navy's F-35C carrier-based model.

"The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35C, reducing turn performance from 5.1 to 5.0 sustained g's and increasing the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by at least 43 seconds," reads the report prepared by J Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's ***&E. "These changes were due to the results of air vehicle performance and flying qualities evaluations."

The US Air Force F-35A's time has slipped by eight seconds while the US Marine Corps short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B's time has slipped by 16 seconds. However, turn rates for both the A and B models have been impacted more severely than the USN variant. Sustained turning performance for the F-35B is being reduced from 5G to 4.5G while the F-35A sinks from 5.3G to 4.6G according to the report.

"It was a judgement call," Schwartz said. "And not an unreasonable one."

In May 2011, Flightglobal reported that the conventional take-off and landing F-35A's combat radius had dropped to 1,080km, or about 11km short of the requirement. The combat radius for the other two F-35 variants had also declined, but remained above their minimum thresholds.

The range was reduced after Pratt & Whitney diverted more bleed air from the F135 powerplant for cooling purposes. The USAF also accepted new estimates that reduced the F-35A's fuel capacity and added the weight and drag of the Lockheed electro-optical targeting system.

Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar

F-35 the mighty super duper fighter :haha::haha:
 
.
F-35 the mighty super duper fighter :haha::haha:

All expected better performance but it disappointed us. We were supposed to have the two of the 100+ F-35A's. But we delayed our order. Everybody delayed. A big failure. But not as big as we thought! Hi by the way!
 
.
All expected better performance but it disappointed us. We were supposed to have the two of the 100+ F-35A's. But we delayed our order. Everybody delayed. A big failure. But not as big as we thought! Hi by the way!

well it is a successive failure from F22 which is considered as mother of all disaster projects.
 
. .
Can other participating countries get their money back?
 
. .
Well ,its still going to be the most advance plane out there not named F-22 when its inducted.
 
.
Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar

The US Department of Defense is lowering the performance bar for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter according to a new report by the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation (***&E).

The specifications for all three variants pertaining to transonic acceleration and sustained turn rates have been reduced. Worst hit in terms of acceleration is the US Navy's F-35C carrier-based model.

"The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35C, reducing turn performance from 5.1 to 5.0 sustained g's and increasing the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by at least 43 seconds," reads the report prepared by J Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's ***&E. "These changes were due to the results of air vehicle performance and flying qualities evaluations."

The US Air Force F-35A's time has slipped by eight seconds while the US Marine Corps short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B's time has slipped by 16 seconds. However, turn rates for both the A and B models have been impacted more severely than the USN variant. Sustained turning performance for the F-35B is being reduced from 5G to 4.5G while the F-35A sinks from 5.3G to 4.6G according to the report.

"It was a judgement call," Schwartz said. "And not an unreasonable one."

In May 2011, Flightglobal reported that the conventional take-off and landing F-35A's combat radius had dropped to 1,080km, or about 11km short of the requirement. The combat radius for the other two F-35 variants had also declined, but remained above their minimum thresholds.

The range was reduced after Pratt & Whitney diverted more bleed air from the F135 powerplant for cooling purposes. The USAF also accepted new estimates that reduced the F-35A's fuel capacity and added the weight and drag of the Lockheed electro-optical targeting system.

Pentagon lowers F-35 performance bar

Instead of seeing the failure of f35, we need to see its technical barriers. It was too much ambitious project by USA. Thats leads increase budget hick,bigger system critical tech challenges from original f35 project. Good to see that they downgrade the parameters, so thats projet would be physically possible.
 
. . .
I wish we had another choise.

F-35 is not a bad aircraft.it'll still be one of the best for decades,not to mention various upgradation that will take place after introduce of this aircraft.nobody is going to sell anything like this within 2 decades(except USA,Pak-Fa will be mostly for Russia and India,some for others of course,but not before 2025 i guess and Chinese jets,well,those will be for china and even if they sell those,it will not going to be before 2030).so,thats the best you can get.
 
. . .
at $150m each full loaded per plane. and RELYING on seeing first to win a BVR combat scenario and very limited range and weapons load I,M not CONVINCED.

And the impression i get is that the joint partners how ever small ARE GETTING COLD FEET ie AUSTRILIA CANADA TURKEY AND EVEN UK are mumuring disatisfaction.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom