LordTyrannus
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 2,310
- Reaction score
- -29
- Country
- Location
Yep its not Commie style to use stinky jihadi animals. Al qaida is a 20 dollar whore. USA is a whoremonger and a warmonger. LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The next article is China, the Paper Tiger followed by China's Military more Dangerous than previously Thought.just another trick from US warmongers asking for more money by trumping up china-threat, the trick gets old but never fails.
Some are hardened terrorists happy with fake 150$/monthsYep its not Commie style to use stinky jihadi animals. Al qaida is a 20 dollar whore. USA is a whoremonger and a warmonger. LOL
China is not a communist country. It is an amoral country, meaning it has no philosophical foundation to stand upon, other than the ridiculous 'Chinese characteristics' conditioning for whatever the Party do.
Well the article quote from OP point out the defence budget increase if China and Russia versus the budget decrease in the US.
The relation between the assumed technology gap being pulled closer is solely represented by the increase of budget of the two country
Now, for the same reason, I can stand in front of the congress and testified that Japan have increase their defence budget from 55 billions in 2011 to 58 billions in 2014, and that although war between US and Japan is nothigh, but the chance of Japanese military equipment would be transferred to the country of potential conflict and US should therefore increase the budget
Lol sound familiar?
The fact to the matter is, it would be long before China can seriously challenge the American in the western Pacific. Even then, we would have to assume in the next 20 years or so China keep the grow while the American are sitting on their fat *** and do nothing.
"Overall, China's military investments are increasing in double-digit numbers each year, about 10 percent," Kendall said. "Their budget is far smaller than ours. But their personnel costs are also far smaller than ours."