What's new

Pentagon analyzing China-India tensions

Says the wahabbi who are cannibals and eat live hearts of syrian soldiers. You guys make Genghis Khan look like an angel from heaven.

I'm guessing you are referring to the Syrian fighter who did such heinous act right? Well, he wasn't a radical bro, in fact, he was an affiliate of the FSA not Al-Qaida, your claim is funny BTW :lol:
 
.
Chances of India and china going to war is extremely remote and non existent,the bickering at border will continue till a lasting solution is found for border dispute settlement, there trade is going to touch 100 $ dollar although its surplus is in china's favor. why would china force a war which if it won at all will leave it crippled too

Regarding US, NATO support to India during war will be mostly moral but all the India's forces of mountain warfare including the recently announced mountain division are being armed exclusively of US state of art modern weapons, this is apparently showing in many deals concluded with the US in last one year (all the weapons contracted are china specific), all are being deployed on china border including Carrier Vikarmaditya and IAC 1 which will be deployed on in Indian navy's eastern fleet. As saying goes " A nation prepare for war in peace time and not during war"
 
.
They control a lot of things in partnership with the British monarchy my friend. I would advise you not to look at the issue with a biased ego.

Israel is the creation of the Rothschild(Refer Balfour Declaration) and has huge military R&D. US federal Reserve is under Rothschild control. Also there are higher figures than Song on rothschild wealth , one of them given by a former marketing executive at level of 300 trillion$.

the derivatives OTC market is 1.3 quadrillion $. But the 5 trillion $ figure for Rothschild given by Song is calculated by sound methods. Second ,Check the statement of Ashley Mote an EU MP on Global security fund of Rothschild.

Rockefeller and Morgan family control USA, Rothschild's domain mostly remains in Europe.

Although Rockefeller had some Jewish bloodline, but they have been fully converted into Christianity, while J.P Morgan was a full blood WASP.
 
. .
[Bregs];4713489 said:
Chances of India and china going to war is extremely remote and non existent,the bickering at border will continue till a lasting solution is found for border dispute settlement, there trade is going to touch 100 $ dollar although its surplus is in china's favor. why would china force a war which if it won at all will leave it crippled too

True, but as long as India does not procure a "Nehru" and kickoff another "Forward Policy". I can guarantee you, China will not be the first to start any war.
 
.
True, but as long as India does not procure a "Nehru" and kickoff another "Forward Policy". I can guarantee you, China will not be the first to start any war.

that is why there will be no India-China war.. !!

for India also if China does not enter Sikkim, AP, Kashmir or blocks river, I can guarantee India will not also not result in a war.
 
.
that is why there will be no India-China war.. !!

for India also if China does not enter Sikkim, AP, Kashmir or blocks river, I can guarantee India will not also not result in a war.

Sound like asking China to give up South Tibet and forbid us to do to exploite our own natural resource in order to met your peace condition :lol:
 
.
Rockefeller and Morgan family control USA, Rothschild's domain mostly remains in Europe.

Although Rockefeller had some Jewish bloodline, but they have been fully converted into Christianity, while J.P Morgan was a full blood WASP.

Rockefeller and Morgan family were both representitives of the Rothschild family to take care of business in North America. So yes, Rothschild is the most powerful family.

Rockefeller and Morgan family are extremely powerful, but they work for the Rothschids.
 
.
Invalid comparison, US-NATO attacking Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam is not the same as US-NATO supplying weapons to India in a war against China. Considering, China will most likely discover weapons transfer via satellite and that will have international repercussions for many western countries. Besides, China is economically vital to the West far more than India. They aren't going to provide Indian military weaponry that will only prolong the war. Besides, even if they gave you weaponry of sophisticated variety your troops still need to learn how to operate the weaponry and master it before it can become effective in the battlefield, Indian army may not have enough time as the next war may very well be a short and decisive one.


Why don't you be specific and tell me what kind of military weaponry do you think US-NATO is going to supply India in a conflict against China?

Jeez past history has shown how fast and easy it is to supply our friends with weapons. WW2 for example under Lend Lease Act. Or providing weapons to the Mujahadeen during the Soviet Afghan war which by the way the Soviets didn't attack the U.S. in retaliation for that. What is China going to do if they found out U.S. is supplying weapons? Economic warfare? We can play that as well.

Oh and don't think wars will end that quickly especially a total war.
 
.
Jeez past history has shown how fast and easy it is to supply our friends with weapons. WW2 for example under Lend Lease Act. Or providing weapons to the Mujahadeen during the Soviet Afghan war which by the way the Soviets didn't attack the U.S. in retaliation for that. What is China going to do if they found out U.S. is supplying weapons? Economic warfare? We can play that as well.

Oh and don't think wars will end that quickly especially a total war.


It really will depend on the administration in the White House.
 
.
Jeez past history has shown how fast and easy it is to supply our friends with weapons. WW2 for example under Lend Lease Act. Or providing weapons to the Mujahadeen during the Soviet Afghan war which by the way the Soviets didn't attack the U.S. in retaliation for that. What is China going to do if they found out U.S. is supplying weapons? Economic warfare? We can play that as well.

Oh and don't think wars will end that quickly especially a total war.

Considering that most of the US corporate industrial assets are in China,the losses will be much more exponential for US economy and its multinationals in event of economic warfare or Chinese confiscation of US assets .
And Lend lease constituted only 10-15% of soviet industrial war effort.
 
.
Are you kidding me? We have many large hidden uranium fields discovered recently. We can produce as much as we want, but during the peaceful period we don't wanna waste too much money on nukes.

China says a large uranium mine discovered

US is still technologically superior, but in term of the production capability, even they cannot match us right now.

Go ahead, if you believe that China is something to be messed with. :coffee:

not to forget Sino-Pak collaboration in the uranium rich region of gilgit-baltistan, in fact this place has uranium as one of its resources the company which is mining is a Chinese one, many have said it that the recent heinous & cowardly attack on the respected Chinese mountaineering brother has been do to with many powers who are quiet unease towards it, cant wait for china to enter the warm waters through gwadar that will be a historic feat to reckon which till now only the U.S has achieved
the real game will start there, lets face it china is already a $ 7 trillion economy with a growth rate of 7% next only to the U.S 's $ 14 trillion with a staggering debt of nearly $16 trillion & a growth rate struggling @ less then 4 % its only a matter of time

as the saying is the future of Persian gulf will be "big mac vs chow mien"

http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/uncle-sam-eats-chinese-takeout-10259835.jpg
 
.
could you elaborate on that please, are saying that the Sino-Pak strategic relation is in fact a one sided one ? if that is so then how come China literally helped Pakistan achieved nuclear weapons & missile technology ? not to mention helping Pakistan in achieving a 4 th gen fighter jet making capability, exploring jet engine technology, helping Pakistan achieve frigate building capabilities & last but not the least a nuclear submarine project ! building a strategic corridor from China to Gwadar in Pakistan to relives it self from the vulnerable Malacca dilemma is one sided ?, what kind of a one sided relationship has Pakistan playing a vital role in bringing Sri Lanka & now even to some extent Maldives in to the Chinese sphere of influence ? err don't you think that these are bit too much for a one sided relationship ?

I meant in case of and Indo-Pak war Israel only had relation with only one side and that was India....You did not have any relation with Israel...In case of Indo-China war Israel has relation with both sides and they might not help India against China!I am not talking about Pak-China relations!
 
.
I meant in case of and Indo-Pak war Israel only had relation with only one side and that was India....You did not have any relation with Israel...In case of Indo-China war Israel has relation with both sides and they might not help India against China!I am not talking about Pak-China relations!

sorry bro i misunderstood your post, I deleted it

:cheers:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom