What's new

Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

Good news. NAB to file sub reference in Azizia Steel Mills case against Kulsoom Nawaz, Shahbaz Sharif and Hamza along with the other accused chor tubbar.
 
.
hahahaha matlab chaa gaya Miyan saanp!!! phalay maanta nai tha ab tohri bhut peh agaya hai!

kal Zardari bolay ga Zulfiqar bhutto na constitution banaya hum naa sindh ka rape kia toh kia howa!
Could found this anywhere else,,,
 
.
Good news. NAB to file sub reference in Azizia Steel Mills case against Kulsoom Nawaz, Shahbaz Sharif and Hamza along with the other accused chor tubbar.

Confusion: Some news outlets are quoting NAB that an enquiry has been ordered at the same time and sub-references shall be filed after investigation completes against accused.

Al-Azizia case: NAB approves supplementary reference against Sharifs

sharif-refranse.jpg



ISLAMABAD (92 News) – The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has approved a supplementary reference against the Sharif brothers in the Al-Azizia and Hill Metal cases.

The decision was made during a meeting of the Executive Board, which was chaired by NAB Chairman Justice (retd) Javed Iqbal on Monday.

Investigations will also be conducted against Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif over transfer of suspicious amounts.

Meanwhile, an inquiry has been approved against Hamza, Maryam Nawaz and Kulsoom Nawaz.
 
. . . . . .
:omghaha:NEHAL HASHMI ASKED TO APPEAR BEFORE SUPREME COURT TO ANSWER FOR HIS TIRADE AFTER RELEASE FROM IMPRISONMENT ON EARLIER CONTEMPT:omghaha:

But yeh phir six months ja kar wapis aajaega.. phir gaaliyan dena shuru kardega..

Khair another good news:


SC said that they are not satisfied with Daniyal Aziz's response to the notice and has decided to indict him on 13th March.. lolll
 
. .



---------------------
But yeh phir six months ja kar wapis aajaega.. phir gaaliyan dena shuru kardega..

Khair another good news:


SC said that they are not satisfied with Daniyal Aziz's response to the notice and has decided to indict him on 13th March.. lolll

Waisyek cheez samajh nahi aarahi.. why is Nihal Hashmi's review petition being heard by a different bench? Review petition tu hamesha same bench sunta hai.. J Khosa headed the bench on Nohal Hashmi's case.. now his review petition is being heard by bench headed by CJ... ye kaisy??
 
Last edited:
.
But yeh phir six months ja kar wapis aajaega.. phir gaaliyan dena shuru kardega..
Bay shak, the nature of the ceremonial punishment is to instil some humility and reflection in the hearts and minds of the deranged perpetrator. Somebody who does some contempt in the spur of the moment like burst of emotions.

The contempt law seems toothless against those who are doing deliberate, planned and organized contempt with the aim to malign the state institutions.

The courts may see this whole episode of contempt in the larger scheme of events and therefore, the wider scope of other relevant applicable laws and punishments for crimes against state such as open rebellion and incitement to violence against state shall come into focus:
 
.
Waisyek cheez samajh nahi aarahi.. why is Nihal Hashmi's review petition being neard by a different bench? Review petition tu hamesha same bench sunta hai.. J Khosa headed the bench on Nohal Hashmi's case.. now his review petition is being heard by bench headed by CJ... ye kaisy??

It's not review petition I think.. It's appeal..
 
.
It's not review petition I think.. It's appeal..

SC main 184/3 ke cases main tu appeal hoti hi naih hai... sirf review hota hai...aur kuch days pehle news aayi thee ke Nihal Hashmi ne review petition file ki hai...
 
.
SC main 184/3 ke cases main tu appeal hoti hi naih hai... sirf review hota hai...aur kuch days pehle news aayi thee ke Nihal Hashmi ne review petition file ki hai...

Was this heard under 184/3? I don't think.. it was a simple case of taheen e adalat..

========================================

J Azmat Saeed

عدالت نے دانیال عزیز کا جواب غیرتسلی بخش قرار دیتے ہوئے کہا کہ دانیال عزیز پر 13 مارچ کو فردِ جرم عائد کی جائے گی۔ جسٹس عظمت سعید نے ریمارکس دیئے کہ قانون کے مطابق انصاف ہوگا، آپ کے مؤکل نے پاناما کا مکمل ریکارڈ نہیں پڑھا، الفاظ خود بولتے ہیں۔ جسٹس عظمت سعید نے کہا کہ میں 14 سال سے جج ہوں لیکن کبھی کسی کے خلاف توہین عدالت کا نوٹس نہیں لیا، میں نے تو عدالتی فیصلوں میں یہاں تک لکھا ہے کہ فیصلوں پر اچھے اور برے تاثرات کا اظہار کرسکتے ہیں لیکن اب میں خود تنگ آچکا ہوں۔
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom