What's new

Pakistan's terrible idea to develop battlefield nukes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who the heck is this in TICKER's Id ? !!!.....I think some indian hacked it !!!:hitwall:

When any analysis is carried out, it should be unbiased - an unbiased analyst is the one who removes his nationality, his religious beliefs, his personal differences and anything else that may influence an unbiased analytical venture. It is when the analyst makes recommendations or suggest response measures, he should wear the nationality and other aspects which may be required - not all are though needed at the same time.

This is my take on analysis and analysts. However, I don't always follow these when I don't want to. :)

Stole the words from my mouth!!:cheesy:
At first I thought he was being sarcastic:agree:

Come on my left side and the word sarcasm will lose its meanings.
 
. .
It was under such a scenario..US said...that IF pak ever fell to militants or islamist mullahs, we have back up plan

Noted!
but just remember, a preemptive strike based on a bold IF is not a BACKUP plan!
The point is that there B-52 could have bombed Pentagon with the 6 nukes it carried without anyone know of this..
so IF that happen, what is the back up plan there?

Why so much cry on one states nukes only!

Biased approach!

One cannot/should not base the decision or actions on If's at international stage!
 
.
This sure will blast away some misconceptions of many Pakistanis .. lol!

Lol welldone mate. Some guy with no sense from right to left writes this crap and u think it will clear misconception. Ur a legend dude.

Pakistan and India will never go to War with each other. India has too much to loose. Thry wont risk it. And pakistani will never attack first.
 
.
Man again with the nukes.

In all honesty Nukes can never be used by anyone. And im not gonna go into the detail of how wars are gonna be fought.

land grabs will involve slow combinations of covert incitations, aggression and then indoctrination,aggression, indoctrination, over hundreds of years.

There will never be an escalation big enough to justify a nuclear strike and if such a time comes be assured tht it would end up in a free far all.

Not to forget Pakistan dose not have the diplomatic standing or the resources to back a nuclear strike.

THe only justification for Pakistan would be a justified proof of its own annihilation. And thts not gonna happen ,what could happen though is much worse cause it will deprive u of ur ideological credence.

In the resent conditions America has maybe only another 50 years within which it may be able to pull a strike off unscathed and tht too on non major powers.

Tough the affects would nearly not be as devastating as the cost America would have to bear morally and diplomatically.
 
.
.....
The point is that there B-52 could have bombed Pentagon with the 6 nukes it carried without anyone know of this..
so IF that happen, what is the back up plan there?...........

There is a backup plan IF the Pentagon is destroyed, of which Cheyenne Mountain is one part.
 
.
when your enemies crying on your weapon its mean its effective :bounce: imran khan defence.pk
when laathi welding Farmers of punjab put a formidable opposition to gun totting SSG commandos hiding in the cornfields and rounded them all then i think every thing went wrong and nothing was effective except the perception of being effective.

Ajtr @ defence.pk


:bounce:


..........
 
. .
:lol: when US Russia goes for these its ok when India, Pakistan try to have these its threat to the entire world.

Why dont US and Russia eleminate its nukes and then start cleaning every country of it stop producing weapons of mass destruction and lets just resume Sword fights

Funnily enough, it was the Americans who used nuke on civilians (twice I believe). They happen to be the only "responsible" nuclear power to have done so. One thing 'irresponsible' nuclear powers such as China, Russia, North Korea and Pakistan etc failed to do. :rolleyes:
 
.
There is a backup plan IF the Pentagon is destroyed, of which Cheyenne Mountain is one part.

:)
If by back up plan you mean what they will do after the attack has been carried out, well, they can still go to their Cheyenne Mountain even if the Pentagon is destroyed by Pakistan UN-Secured nukes cant they? So why the fuss?

I was talking about what is the back up plan from preventing that from happening
 
.
I hope border Dispute ends , Peace Prevails. Look How World is developing and we are still fighting like Kids from last 60+ years. Even the Idea Of using Nukes on a Neighboring country looks Idiotic.
 
.
:)
If by back up plan you mean what they will do after the attack has been carried out, well, they can still go to their Cheyenne Mountain even if the Pentagon is destroyed by Pakistan UN-Secured nukes cant they? So why the fuss?

I was talking about what is the back up plan from preventing that from happening

A "backup" plan by definition is not a "prevention" program - and neither is a "pre-emptive" plan, is it not, or am I not understanding you?
 
.
A "backup" plan by definition is not a "prevention" program - and neither is a "pre-emptive" plan, is it not, or am I not understanding you?

yes you are understanding boss...
:)
 
.
"For the United States, the nightmare scenario is that some of Pakistan's warheads or its fissile material falls into the hands of the Taliban or al Qaeda -- or, worse, that the whole country falls into the hands of the Taliban.


The CIA will train these illiterate Taliban how to steal the nuclear waste, create a dirty bomb and do this false flag operation. This is a very high possibility.

After this line, all the author says is typical American rant that India is shining and Pakistan is sinking.
 
.
Binladen entire family recovered alive from the Abottabad can provide without witness testimonies that OBL was killed in that raid..enough.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom