What's new

Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons Should Terrify You

He is counting on that. That is why, India's massive nuclear retaliation would be in a form of nuclear decapitation strike, perhaps TNW against your nuclear installations, with the aim of taking out most of your land based arsenal and Command and control. Of course Pakistan would fire its remaining, nuclear weapons.

Some of them will be intercepted, some of them will fall on Indian cities. And depending on how many Pakistani strategic weapons made it through. India will respond with strategic nuclear strikes on Pakistan's population centers.



Lol ...show us, where did your DGISPR claim, that Pakistan had readied 100 nuclear weapons within just 10 minutes.
Also dont forget to nuke all the arabian sea...as each sub can hold dozens of nukes as well...

Assuming you were able to nuke all pakistan with 500 nukes..opps you dont even have that many nukes

So first get the required number of nukes, troops and fighters...february showed india has none of these
 
.
Yes, Pakistan checked India's advance on the nuclear front for nearly two decades now. However, things are becoming more fluid, slowly though. The rising economic disparity between India and Pakistan will further fuel the fluidity of the situation. If the economic gap between India and Pakistan continues to grow, the economic differential will start turning into military differential and investment into newer technologies that bring more ambiguity into play. It's hard to quantify that now but a hypothetical example could be potential breakthroughs in BMD and India acquiring enough to give them the confidence of neutralizing most Pakistani BM's fired. That could give them the confidence to respond to a tactical nuke with a small strategic one. The 'strategic strike' from India could be a small or remote town/village.

Economics differences have very long lead times. Some Pakistani intellectuals have actually started commenting on this - that the economic disparities now will translate into military and technological differentials decades down the line. Bullwhip effect of a different kind. Makes for interesting reading what the intellectual commentators of India and Pakistan say.

This is another BS India has learned in previous few years. False sense of superiority. It is not only military they think they can just destroy Pakistan, whenever they wish. Second, they think they are the super rich country in the world. Stupid people do not realise that first of all Per Capita income of India has just slightly ahead of Pakistan, and for that we can thank corrupt Zardari and Sharifs.

Indians don't realise that poverty is more dire in India that it ever had been in Pakistan.
Let me read them some interesting facts about their richest city Mumbari.
Half of its 12 Million people live in squalid "Jhopar Patis" spread all over the city. Further 10%+ have no homes, not even the shacks in Jhopar Patis, they live on footpaths, born there, die there.

So much so for the world richest country.
 
.
Pakistan has just 10 or so more nuclear weapons, with one third of them being tactical. Where as total yield of Indian nuclear weapons is believed to far larger than Pakistan's arsenal.

Considering India has 4.5 times more land area than Pakistan, 6 times more population, a missile defence system in the process of deployment and a true nuclear triad. Indian nuclear response would be far more devastating for Pakistan, than Pakistan's for India.
I wish I was more like these people. So care free and brainless

Thanks for the delusional post. Lolz
BTW Modi is still a champion. We Indians don't care or believe in Pakistan's delusional propaganda.
Why to waste bullets when we can demage you without firing it.
If 27th feb was a successful day then 370 act would never be happened.
27th Feb was just a test of Pakistani capabilities. You were failed in it. Thats why Modi didn't waste time annexing Kashmir through 370.
Yes. Tiger shroff will eat our army during the war.
 
. .
Indian policy is clear, you use Nukes of any kind, it's Nuclear war the response may be disproportional. The reason why Americans and Russians didn't make more TNW and armed their respective armies with it is that it gives low ranking military men operating batteries too much power, rather the fate of the nation hangs in the hands of these men, unlike a central nuclear command involving different checks and balances.
Only for domestic consumption. In the real world your response can never be disproportional because pf geography and the relevent capability of the other party. If we use a tactical weapon on invading Indian forces, it would mean that our strategic weapons will be hot and any strategic launch by India will result in similar launch from Pakistan, unless you are naive enough to believe that we will wait to be hit firs to see if it was nuclear or non nuclear. Using of tactical nuclear weapons would mean that Pakistan is prepared for MAD and ball will be in India's court whether to escalate the ladder or back down.
No wonder India is thinking about its own tactical nuclear weapons.
 
.
Accept it. He cried a lot. Ab jaake chup hua hai. Because nobody listened what "heavenly truth'' he told.
Ahh how cute world especially western world needs you because you're puppet of them to contain China that's why they are ignoring your crimes against humanity,,and our duty to rise the voice against your crimes it doesn't matter whether some countries listening or not listening
 
.
Pakistan has just 10 or so more nuclear weapons, with one third of them being tactical. Where as total yield of Indian nuclear weapons is believed to far larger than Pakistan's arsenal.

Considering India has 4.5 times more land area than Pakistan, 6 times more population, a missile defence system in the process of deployment and a true nuclear triad. Indian nuclear response would be far more devastating for Pakistan, than Pakistan's for India.
Don't forget the nuclear artillery shells. Also our first strike will wipe out 100 million Indians.
 
.
So you believe that a society with multiple distinctive religious cohorts, living in harmony, is not possible?
It is definitely possible but unfortunately if a tea seller is made to decide the fate of an economic giant who is also ingrained since birth that all non-believers (non Hindus) n even believing low castes r non-human, then such a state CAN & MUST NOT b allowed to go about it's affairs normally.
It should be cut down to it's true size to rightly seem like an imbecile! With rants all the time..... :partay::omghaha:

A
Yes, Pakistan checked India's advance on the nuclear front for nearly two decades now. However, things are becoming more fluid, slowly though. The rising economic disparity between India and Pakistan will further fuel the fluidity of the situation. If the economic gap between India and Pakistan continues to grow, the economic differential will start turning into military differential and investment into newer technologies that bring more ambiguity into play. It's hard to quantify that now but a hypothetical example could be potential breakthroughs in BMD and India acquiring enough to give them the confidence of neutralizing most Pakistani BM's fired. That could give them the confidence to respond to a tactical nuke with a small strategic one. The 'strategic strike' from India could be a small or remote town/village.

Economics differences have very long lead times. Some Pakistani intellectuals have actually started commenting on this - that the economic disparities now will translate into military and technological differentials decades down the line. Bullwhip effect of a different kind. Makes for interesting reading what the intellectual commentators of India and Pakistan say.
All those fellow countrymen who really do care.... This point is valid!
To quote Hazrat Ali (R.A) that not to look at who is saying rather what's being said.
The quicker v set our house in order on the economic front the better!
Any sane person understands this v well.
:pakistan:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom