Thomas
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,688
- Reaction score
- 0
You see there is a small problem here, i.e. zero transparency.
-Do you have count of trucks being hauled per day?
-Do you have payment receipts which shows port charges were paid?
-Do you have payment receipts of fuel being shipped to you?
-Can you prove that all the goods being shipped under guise of NATO supply were really intended for NATO and no non NATO personal or company was source of consumption?
There is no record of any money being received from US by National Highway Authority of Pakistan.
See... when you want to pay for road construction, pay to the relevant authority, same as all international donor agencies do and have record of every single penny lended to Pakistan!
On the US side yes, the military has to account to congress for the money spent. as far as money being paid to the pakistani highway authority would that not be the responsability of those actually doing the transporting? who's trucks are tearing up the road. and would not that cost be figured into the money charged by the shipping company. Which by the way I seem to remember an old thread that showed the at least one of the shipping companies to be a commercial venture of the Pakistani Army.