Pakistan's Special Operations Forces: SSG | SSGN | SSW | SOW | SOG

[Great Janjua]

@PanzerKiel why did the Pakistan air force change their camo again.

 

[PanzerKiel]

@PanzerKiel why did the Pakistan air force change their camo again.

Maybe something long over due, maybe a pressing requirement, or maybe someone thinking of leaving his personal footprint for later, or someone trying to show others that he has also contributed something.

 

[ghazi52]

PAF has also changed their combat force uniform..

 

[Metal 0-1]

PAF has also changed their combat force uniform..

View attachment 886047

Absolute dogshit

 

[White privilege]

Absolute dogshit

OMG, not this pre-2016 commando camo again. The grey tone was fine yawr.....

 

[ghazi52]

,.,

 

[CLUMSY]

OMG, not this pre-2016 commando camo again. The grey tone was fine yawr.....

Nah, not imo. As someone who has access to both the woodland does a MUCH better job and is more practical. The Tiger Stripe camo made no sense, woodland is going to be much more useful for guards at checkpoints at say...places like the base at Sargodha. On runway doesnt matter since its mandatory to wear reflective vests. Still shouldve gone with multicam, but i think this is better than the prev one.

 

[Reichmarshal]

PAF has also changed their combat force uniform..

View attachment 886047

These inferiority complexed fu#kers dident have the balls to volunteer for ssw selection test, so the next best thing is to play ssw dressup

 

[Great Janjua]

These inferiority complexed fu#kers dident have the balls to volunteer for ssw selection test, so the next best thing is to play ssw dressup

SSW choora version

 

[CLUMSY]

These inferiority complexed fu#kers dident have the balls to volunteer for ssw selection test, so the next best thing is to play ssw dressup

Whats wrong with SF and regs having same camo? Its honestly much more beneficial and practical for both. You shouldnt be able to recognize special forces soldiers

 

[Metal 0-1]

Whats wrong with SF and regs having same camo? Its honestly much more beneficial and practical for both. You shouldnt be able to recognize special forces soldiers

It's not even M81.

They had M81 before they switched to some gray pixelated camo then back to this dogleg version of woodland

 

[CLUMSY]

It's not even M81.

They had M81 before they switched to some gray pixelated camo then back to this dogleg version of woodland

Im not saying its the same camo. Its not. Im just attacking the notion that special forces and regs should have seperate camos, can give away your identity and theres not even a point. For SSG/SSW/SSGN and regs a single camo should be standardized imo.

 

[Metal 0-1]

Im not saying its the same camo. Its not. Im just attacking the notion that special forces and regs should have seperate camos, can give away your identity and theres not even a point. For SSG/SSW/SSGN and regs a single camo should be standardized imo.

Man we need to un-standardize camos for Special occasions Operations Community.

 

[CLUMSY]

Man we need to un-standardize camos for Special occasions Operations Community.

In many cases yeah i guess so, either way m81 needs to go. Maybe a variation of multicam pattern

 

[Metal 0-1]

In many cases yeah i guess so, either way m81 needs to go. Maybe a variation of multicam pattern

Nah, M-81 maybe less effective camo than multicam. But it goes hard.

AOR-1, AOR-2 and ATACS-FG are good cause they are effective and go hard af