Pakistan's Special Operations Forces: SSG | SSGN | SSW | SOW | SOG

[Super Falcon]

nice uniform toooo coooooollllllllllllllllllllllllll

 

[MZUBAIR]

do Pakistan ssg have their own training program or they follow westerns or Russians training technique ??????

SSG hav their own training programs, which is of very high standard.
There are mutual training programs with other nationfs......SSG not only get trainings from other nations but also offer training services to other nations.

Desi Shock Videos - 0 - http://videos.desishock.net

 

[pakomar]

SSG hav their own training programs, which is of very high standard.
There are mutual training programs with other nationfs......SSG not only get trainings from other nations but also offer training services to other nations.

Desi Shock Videos - 0 - http://videos.desishock.net

it is said by many that Russian are better trained and better skilled than westerns , westerns relay on modern equipment and tight formations where as russian spetsnaz soldiers can operate alone. Russian spetsnaz training is so hard that they kill 2 to 3 hundred during training.

Pakistan SSG have their own training programs but where SSG training program fits in or close to westerns or Russian???????????

 

[mughaljee]

it is said by many that Russian are better trained and better skilled than westerns

totally agree.
they are among the best.

 

[pakomar]

it is said by many that Russian are better trained and better skilled than westerns , westerns relay on modern equipment and tight formations where as russian spetsnaz soldiers can operate alone. Russian spetsnaz training is so hard that they kill 2 to 3 hundred during training.

Pakistan SSG have their own training programs but where SSG training program fits in or close to westerns or Russian???????????

still waiting for answer

 

[Kompromat]

 

[Mercenary]

still waiting for answer

The training doctrine of US is very different from Europe or Russia.

USA stresses the buddy system in which 2 soldiers operate simultaneously with each other. As such their training doctrine is geared heavily towards team work.

This makes US Special Forces school such as Navy Seals very tough to get through due to have one weak person on the team.

Russian and British Special Forces are about a lone person operating. And thus its a little easier to pass.

Most countries prefer the American buddy system of training. The British SAS were usually involved in deep cover infiltration especially in Northern Ireland.

Later on USA did create a new Anti-Terrorist Force called the US Delta Force which was totally modeled on the British SAS after the botched attempt by the American Green Berets to rescue the hostages in Iran.

Pakistan has incorporated the buddy system in their special forces training with British SAS giving the anti-terrorist training.

Overall, in war, the American Special Forces are probably the best.

Domestic Terrorism, the British SAS and Russian Sptenaz and Alfa Troops are probably the best.

 

[ahmed_naj]

Later on USA did create a new Anti-Terrorist Force called the US Delta Force which was totally modeled on the British SAS after the botched attempt by the American Green Berets to rescue the hostages in Iran.

Sir, Delta Force (SFOD-D) was formed before the hostage crises, they were actually part of the task force that was going to carry out the operation.

 

[haji.muhammad]

vy3vSEivsbo[/media] - Pakistan ARMY The elite SSG commando force of Pakistan the power of islam by ch.s.imran

Amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I particularly like rolling in Black dress, amazing and wonderful.

 

[Windjammer]

Thanks for sharing "B B", A Professional display by an elite unit.

 

[pakomar]

The training doctrine of US is very different from Europe or Russia.

USA stresses the buddy system in which 2 soldiers operate simultaneously with each other. As such their training doctrine is geared heavily towards team work.

This makes US Special Forces school such as Navy Seals very tough to get through due to have one weak person on the team.

Russian and British Special Forces are about a lone person operating. And thus its a little easier to pass.

Most countries prefer the American buddy system of training. The British SAS were usually involved in deep cover infiltration especially in Northern Ireland.

Later on USA did create a new Anti-Terrorist Force called the US Delta Force which was totally modeled on the British SAS after the botched attempt by the American Green Berets to rescue the hostages in Iran.

Pakistan has incorporated the buddy system in their special forces training with British SAS giving the anti-terrorist training.

Overall, in war, the American Special Forces are probably the best.

Domestic Terrorism, the British SAS and Russian Sptenaz and Alfa Troops are probably the best.

thank you sir for clearing that up

american special forces relay on modern equipment and steal formation and they are link with command center all the time but in case of Pakistan we do n t have modern technology ??? correct me if i am wrong....do our commandos have the same technology capabilities as american behind enemy lines.

 

[Mercenary]

thank you sir for clearing that up

american special forces relay on modern equipment and steal formation and they are link with command center all the time but in case of Pakistan we do n t have modern technology ??? correct me if i am wrong....do our commandos have the same technology capabilities as american behind enemy lines.

In terms of communication systems, fiber optic cameras, our technology is probably 10 years behind the Americans. In terms of Weapons, we are probably up to par.

But we don't need such sophisticated equipment to conduct warfare.

America is a superpower and conducts operations throughout the globe such as the Navy Seals killing those Somali Pirates in the Indian Ocean.

Our operations are conducted near or on our home soil and thus we can operate as efficiently as the Americans without such sophisticated equipment such as SSG operating in Swat or the Lal Masjid Siege.

 

[blain2]

thank you sir for clearing that up

american special forces relay on modern equipment and steal formation and they are link with command center all the time but in case of Pakistan we do n t have modern technology ??? correct me if i am wrong....do our commandos have the same technology capabilities as american behind enemy lines.

There is always radio communications with the higher HQ. This has gone on for many decades. Even in 65 war this was the case. The difference now is that the gear in use is much smaller. They use manpacks for communications between SSG teams in the field and company/bn hq. Within the teams in the field, they use smaller tactical radios. The difference is the technology available to the American FACs and observers and what is available to us. The Americans have switched over to satellite linkages and digital grids on hand-held systems whereas in Pakistan this technology is not pervasive and most of the communication is conducted with UHF/VHF radios. Some of the newer radios acquired have the ability to communicate directly with assets in the air making the job of observers with infantry etc. easier.

The technology to equip the SF is usually the most expensive of any given to the foot soldiers. As such its a long and slow process of induction.

 

[mughaljee]

Wonderful.

 

[Kompromat]

Thanks for sharing "B B", A Professional display by an elite unit.

I liked my PDF Nickname