volatile
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2011
- Messages
- 4,041
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Thanks for putting so much effort in answering me . I have read things with open mind but not just to respond to you so bear with me .Army is not absolved of any damages they inflicted on the country. However, whenever a government is judged it is evaluated as a package. Economy plays vital role for any nation. In my opinion economy has been better in armed forces tenure against civilian rule. Zia's tenure saw lowest GDP growth, which was higher then any civilian government. By the principle of induction and deduction by Bertrand Russell, military rule has been better in Pakistan. This does not mean that I am not for democracy but yes I am definitely against democrazy. Nevertheless, if you probe into each country's development and growth, it will not be wrong to say that it has been because of some sort of dictatorship. Pure democracy has always created chaos.
It is a misconception that army invites Jihadis. That was the era of Afghan invasion which is over long ago. In that context also, Jihadis were created by those who speak against the most. This has been accepted publicly by Hillary Clinton.
No country is our enemy, but each country is their own friend, we are our own enemies.
Arms export is large enough to offset defence budget.
The misconception of defence budget is that it goes into pockets of armed forces. I would recommend googling for a show by Mubashir Lucman who explained this in great detail.
Seems your observation and recommendations are mainly based on Hamid Mir and Marvi Simrand type journalist and you own research is missing.
No doubt, but who is violating this principle armed forces or the politicians. In armed forces their system is working, it is the political induction in PIA, LESCO, Steel mill, police, bureaucracy, education, etc etc which has brought these institution to the brink of disaster.
Whose consensus? It has been two months these political parties have not been able to reach a consensus on Panama Leaks. They can reach consensus on their personal benefits, like life time benefits for MPAs & MNAs. They can reach the consensus on increasing pays of MNAs and MPAs 10 times. But they cannot reach a consensus on foreign policy. Because each has different vested interest. If these policies are made on the basis of national interest. It will automatically align itself with what Armed Forces desire.
By the way you must google for the thesis written by armed forces personnel, during the Staff Courses, on international relations, foreign policy, etc. You will be able to compare their competence against politicians, who some time do not know spelling of foreign policy.
I was watching a tv show once where the anchor asked Farid Paracha of JI, that politicians talk of billions in budget can you tell me how many zeros are there in a billion. Mr Paracha was speechless.
Pakistan was envisaged as a nation second to none. But unfortunately beggars cannot carve their own destiny. Our political leadership has begged so much that we as a nation have lost self respect, self esteem and up righteousness
Not interfering in each others work is the ideal thing, provided objective is same. Best example is there was no interference in anyone work in AZ's tenure. Objective was same i..e make money.
My dear respect is not demanded but commanded through self example and conduct. Same goes for assuming the command. Person has to be competent enough to assume command. Look at the history of world, mutiny and revolt originated against a weak commander. If political leadership is competent enough, working in national interest and spotless; there will never be a takeover.
Who is promoting them? the same people who called them terrorist. all the political parties declared them terrorist and did not invite them in their london conference. And now what they have been partners to PMLN, PPP, JI, JUI and even at some places TI.
Kh Asif recently tweeted that energy requirement is aroun 19K and production is 16K. Why is he not talking about installed capacity. In Musharaf's days Pakistan had reached install capacity of 20K MW. More then our todays requirement.
Not our cup of tea.
I will put constitution for your kind attention.
Part XII: Miscellaneous
Chapter 2: Armed Forces.
644[
243. Command of Armed Forces.-
(1) The Federal Government shall have control and command of the Armed Forces.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces shall vest in the President.
(3) The President shall subject to law, have power-
(a) to raise and maintain the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan; and the Reserves of such Forces; and
(b) to grant Commissions in such Forces.
(3) The President shall, on advice of the Prime Minister, appoint-
(a) the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee;
(b) the Chief of the Army Staff;
(c) the Chief of the Naval Staff; and
(d) the Chief of the Air Staff,
and shall also determine their salaries and allowances.
http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/constitution/part12.ch2.html
] 644
244 Oath of Armed Forces.
Every member of the Armed Forces shall make oath in the form set out in the Third Schedule.
245 Functions of Armed Forces.
651[(1)] 651 The Armed Forces shall, under the directions of the Federal Government, defend Pakistan against external aggression or threat of war, and, subject to law, act in aid of civil power when called upon to do so.
652[
(2) The validity of any direction issued by the Federal Government under clause (1) shall not be called in question in any court.
Direction of Fed Govt ? Interesting right .
1958–1969 Ayub Khan`s coupe
He formed Convention Muslim League which included Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who would later become Pakistan's first democratically elected Prime Minister. Tensions with India flared in the 1960s and a brief border skirmish was fought near the Rann of Kutch area during April 1965. The War began after the failure of Operation Gibraltar on 5 August 1965.
Remarks
PPP was born with Bhutto being the leader . War with India pushed us back with any chances of normalization (Debateable point) . Baghdad pact resulted in Isolation locally making Russian our enemy .
1969-1971 Yahya Khan
During the rule of Yahya Khan, the people of East Pakistan protested against various political and economic disparities that had been imposed on them by West Pakistan and massive civil unrest broke out in East Pakistan.
Remarks
We lost half of Pakistan , Same Bhutto who was planted and groomed make sure that happened .
The PAF and Navy's fighter pilots have voluntarily served in Arab nations' militaries against Israel in the Yom Kippur War (1973). Who authorized this and in the end we make Israel our enemy .
1977–1999 Zia Ul Haq
In 1977, a coup, Operation Fair Play, was staged by General Zia ul-Haq and the government was overthrown. Bhutto was hanged resulted in deepening Provisional rivalry between Punjab and Sindh . In 1980s, the Pakistan Armed Forces co-operated with the United States to provide arms, ammunition and intelligence assistance to Afghan rebels who were fighting the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.Rising tensions with neighboring USSR in their involvement in Afghanistan, Pakistani intelligence community, mostly the ISI,systematically coordinated the U.S. resources to the Afghan mujahideen and foreign fighters against the Soviet Union's presence in the region.
Remarks
USSR enemy ,India Enemy ,Afg turned into chaos ,Mujhadein , AK47 ,Relegious fanatics were born , NS was born
1999–2008 Musharaf
In October 1999, after the Kargil Conflict ended with the unconditional withdrawal of the Pakistani forces from the Indian controlled peaks, the Pakistan Army overthrew a democratically elected government once more, resulting in additional sanctions being applied against Pakistan, leading to General Pervez Musharraf coming to power in a bloodless coup.
Remarks
Kargil great adventure ,Lost Siachen in early years ,NS thrown into exile ,WOT joined . U turn on Taliban ,Turn Peaceful country into war zone .
1. OVer all from History we learned ,all Political parties were made in Era of Dictators ,(We are expecting them to give results ?) Right . Latest case is Imran Khan sb . For Pak GDP to grow following things contributed in this .
GDP = Consumer spending + Govt Spending on projects + Investments (AID) + Exports
View attachment 307038
In Mushi time special quota for US exports were given to Pak for period of 5 years . other than this its steady climb
From 1957 to 1971 Max Aids coming thru ,From 1980 to 1990 flow of aid coming thru ,from 2000 to 2010 Aid coming ,What do you say to that ?
My friend we are not enemy for any one but thing is we are repeating the same mistake over and over again ,this time nothing will be left ,saw two Marshal Laws my self saw my society from Liberal to conservative to enlighted moderation ,So what do you say .All our Foreign and interior policies are made some where else not by representatives of people which in reality is not why simply all these are created to fullfill agenda .