Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They'll probably replace the HK G3 with something from the West and the Type-56 with something Russian.
I don't expect to see Pakistani made guns in service any time soon.
Chinese arms are unlikely. The modern ones haven't been able to prove if they're reliable yet. Lets see what happens in the winter.I would not be surprised to see if Pak Mil s closely following how Chinese small arms fair up during the winter stand off with India....
Chinese arms are unlikely. The modern ones haven't been able to prove if they're reliable yet. Lets see what happens in the winter.
Chinese assault rifles have no chance. Not one bit. It will be either Turkish or European.Many of the ones evaluated have not been tested that much in combat imagine
Chinese assault rifles have no chance. Not one bit. It will be either Turkish or European.
Only their older weapons were reliable. Now they're mainly junk and haven't seen combat.
I agree. The Chinese are good at making tanks, for that we only have to look at the South Sudanese and Sudanese war where Type 85s decimated T-72s.chinese modern weaponry is all pieces of shit, we should avoid them like the plaugue
russian, american or european weapons are what we should look at
Nice Joke. Gave me a chuckle.The new qbz 191 is better and more reliable than ak12 and more moddable than scar h
Proof?Nice Joke. Gave me a chuckle.
But AK-12 and SCAR are both reliable and better than QBZ 191.
ow they're mainly junk and haven't seen combat.
What qualifies as 'junk'? Based on what empirical data?chinese modern weaponry is all pieces of shit, we should avoid them like the plaugue
russian, american or european weapons are what we should look at
I apologize, will make sure the right form of language is used and I give supporting information.What qualifies as 'junk'? Based on what empirical data?
The only thing you could claim with certitude is that 'they haven't seen combat', but even there one could question what 'combat' is defined as and why it is necessary if stringent testing has been carried out in different conditions.
And pardon me for being flippant, but do you really need bullets flying at you and shells exploding near you to confirm if a rifle is going to perform as advertised?
I would suggest members refrain from such broad statements (junk, useless, low quality etc) when talking about various weapons systems.
For one, we have members from multiple countries on this forum, and no one likes products manufactured by their nation referred to in such broad, derogatory terms.
Second, statements such as these (junk, useless, lower quality), given the lack of supporting information, reduce the quality of the discussions and forum.