What's new

Pakistan's Service Rifle (G-3, Type-56) Replacement Competition 2016.

Which rifle should win the competition?

  • FN-SCAR-H

    Votes: 241 42.9%
  • Beretta ARX-200

    Votes: 62 11.0%
  • CZ-806 Bren2

    Votes: 116 20.6%
  • Kalashnikov AK-103

    Votes: 127 22.6%
  • Zavasta M21

    Votes: 17 3.0%

  • Total voters
    562
.
Correct. Second from the right, next to the MPT 76 is an HK417:

hk-heckler-koch-hk417-762-rifle-2.jpg


In the pic @Zarvan posted

fb_img_1466423706503-jpg.313270


the front sight is up as is the rear sight, it also has a longer barrel and a few extra holes along the upper grip, but it's an HK417.

You'll see cutout slots on the 416, but not often on the 417.

23394d1407293430-guys-i-got-one-mr-762-img_20140805_195118.jpg


The ones in the pic Zarvan offer are totally different though. It looks as if the gun's got a different front grip altogether.

It's a bit more rounded like this 417.

maxresdefault.jpg


And is probably closer to this Norwegian version.

nnva2.jpg


It's definitely an HK417 though.
Guess I was right..

Thank you Sven & MilSpec. For the confirmation.

No TOT with hk.

Yeah I guess if selected they will order a million units from HK instead of producing them lol.

According to GHQ... Any weapon selected will be produced unde license...

Unless they select 2 rifles .. One to replace the Type... Which is unlikely..
 
. . . . .
.
I hate being wrong, but I'm no stubborn *ss to argue when I'm beaten either. It does look more like the MK216 then anything else doesn't it?

View attachment 313310

W6987_SI_7737_HDR.jpg


MK114_MK216003_zpsc99da706.jpg


PWS012_zps5609d1b0.jpg


And a marksman version with a different front grip and stock

wm_6860497.jpg


Nice detective work:cheers:.

Guess I'll stick to submarines and satellites:D.
Your participation is very welcome and appreciated. :)
 
.
I hate being wrong, but I'm no stubborn *ss to argue when I'm beaten either. It does look more like the MK216 then anything else doesn't it?

View attachment 313310

W6987_SI_7737_HDR.jpg


MK114_MK216003_zpsc99da706.jpg


PWS012_zps5609d1b0.jpg


And a marksman version with a different front grip and stock

wm_6860497.jpg


Nice detective work:cheers:.

Guess I'll stick to submarines and satellites:D.
Your contribution still nevertheless is appreciated
 
.
but why we stuck on 7.62 sir ? because we have ammo in hands ?
Sir it is because:
  1. It is a proven ammo, proven in wars and battles more then once
  2. have excellent stopping power over other different ammo options
  3. We have huge stockpiles of this
  4. Our factories are built for this and we are quite good at making this.
And i am sure there will be a couple of other advantages as well. No need to fix something that is not broken! 7.62×51mm is an excellent choice and have we been using any other perhaps then i would have hoped that we changed and change this size.
 
. . .
Sir it is because:
  1. It is a proven ammo, proven in wars and battles more then once
  2. have excellent stopping power over other different ammo options
  3. We have huge stockpiles of this
  4. Our factories are built for this and we are quite good at making this.
And i am sure there will be a couple of other advantages as well. No need to fix something that is not broken! 7.62×51mm is an excellent choice and have we been using any other perhaps then i would have hoped that we changed and change this size.
Despite the advantages being mentioned by arsalan ...One of major advantage of 7.62x51mm is that it can pierce kevlers and can be lethal even at longer range ...

Here is G3A3 at 600 meters piercing 4mm thick plate

12718163_10205144351078714_2748087480964011480_n.jpg
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom