Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many Indian cities are there??
1 nuke for each city, that'd be enough .
Nuclear arms are not usable but provide the owners very perfect deterrence.
You are an Idiot. Nukes are not the toys by the wayHow many Indian cities are there??
1 nuke for each city, that'd be enough .
Whats the point of counting after 10, or 50 or even 100....who will be left to use the rest and who will be left to see how many more left.
Lol
You should spike that up to world no 1.We dont have any issue.
I don't know how having an ABM, will be miscalculating risk. As I said ABM is a defense weapon that destroys an incoming missile before it explodes. But in these circumstances where Pakistan is increasing its nukes, the best strategy for India is to increases the effectiveness of its ABM.
A bomb on Mumbai or Delhi or Bangalore is enough to destroy India. Hence, India will fear only the first bomb, there after none. So Pakistan having 300 nukes over 100 nukes will have marginal impact on India.
Its easier to improve aggressors than to create defences............ Don't you think than bieng agressor with defensive power is more benificial or in another way to have both sword and shield rather than have sword withour any shield.Defender and aggressor both can miscalculate..
Having ABM can make other side touchy. A small power play on your side can be mistaken as aggressive gesture and may prompt touchy side to take even more aggressive stance.. side without ABM is likely to launch nuke strike first and launch massively as one of counter measures against ABM is overwhelming attack...
Also it leads to inevitable improvements in aggressor missiles ..faster and stealthier and manouverable missiles lead in reduction of own response time..
Also its easier to improve aggressors than to create defences...
There are other scenarios also but all lead to one final outcome...