'Pakistan's Nasr missile is the most dangerous development in South Asia'

[T-Rex]

I dont think Pakisan needs nukes to dismantle this fake fragile and un-natural union of India, few million guns in the hands of Moaists, Khalistanis, Tamils, Northeastern states etc can do better job.

It seems Pakistan has neither the political will nor a viable plan to execute such an undertaking.

 

[FunkyGen]

agar apko ye lagta hai ki hum darre hue hain to kya cheez rok rahi hai apko apne shaheens ko hindustan

yaar hum ne to apne mulk to shining india nai kaha na kaha ke hum super power hain... jo humare bus mein ha karte hain maslan apne jahaz tank wagera bana leite hain time pe...

 

[GURU DUTT]

yaar hum ne to apne mulk to shining india nai kaha na kaha ke hum super power hain... jo humare bus mein ha karte hain maslan apne jahaz tank wagera bana leite hain time pe...

barri achhi baat hai to kya apke tank aur fighter jets time pe bana lene se apke mulk me ho rahi dehshatgardi aur bijli ka bohran khatam ho gaya

waise sacch sachhi batana appne apne mulk me ek 100cc motorcycle engine bhi banaya hai kabhi

 

[Arush]

Nasr missile is the result of the fetish our Generals have with that idiotic Cold Start doctrine of India.

Nuclear weapons are by definition strategic weapons; it makes no sense to marry them with a tactical delivery system.
-----------------------
A 70 km range missile just cannot be operated by a central command and control. In a war scenario, the missile has to handed over to field formation near the border e.g. IV Corps Lahore so that it could be used against the enemy.

Scenario 1: The Indian armor is concentrated near the border. A nuclear missile cannot be used preemptively before the armored formation starts its offensive. Nevertheless, to deter the Indian armor, Nasr has to handed over to the Corps deployed there. This would create a dangerous situation for a whole-scale nuclear war.

Scenario 2: The Indian armor has already jumped off from its assembly areas and has begun its offensive operation. Nasr could not be used again as it would be too close to our formations and cities.
--------------------------------
Why on earth would the Central Command deploy a delivery system that cannot be operated from deep within our borders. Why would someone risk a nuke to be placed along the border!!!!!!!

If a war breaks out, what would be the primary targets? Indian tanks or Indian Command and Control? Why would someone use nukes against tanks when he has the option to obliterate entire cities to deter the enemy.
-------------------
Would India be deterred with destruction of their armored divisions or their cities?

The sanest post of the thread

 

[Yasir 99]

sir with all deu respect there is an unwritten rule of PDF whenever hub bul watan/ patriot pakistanies are chest thumping about their wepon systems never try to infuse logic into them cause if you do get ready for verbal assult /barrage

this thread was for discussion not to fight like children.secondly donot make any statements like pak will not use it in real war senerio etc.this will strt a fight of words.

 

[GURU DUTT]

this thread was for discussion not to fight like children.secondly donot make any statements like pak will not use it in real war senerio etc.this will strt a fight of words.

where did i said that pakistan is not going to use its wepons on india in the first place

 

[AL-Nasr]

Nasr will be no use... neither pakistan is going to deploy them in the battle and give authority to the local commanders nor they are going to fire.

"Pakistan didn't make nuke to show in new year celebration as Firecrackers "

"Pakistan didn't make nuke to show in new year celebration as Firecrackers "

 

[knight11]

"Pakistan didn't make nuke to show in new year celebration as Firecrackers "

This is not the language of a responsible nuclear country. If this is the mind set of the pakistani govt. than it is better to strip the pakistan from its nuclear weapon ASAP.

 

[Uzair Shafiq [Босс]]

Nasr will be no use... neither pakistan is going to deploy them in the battle and give authority to the local commanders nor they are going to fire.

And you know this how?Quit trolling
we didn't make nasr and FM-99 for shab - e - baraat

 

[knight11]

india ki to hafiz saeed ke naam se phat jati hai nasr kahan hazam karein ge or abhi tu shaheen 3 bhi lena ha

And you know this how?Quit trolling
we didn't make nasr and FM-99 for shab - e - baraat

Talk sense

 

[GURU DUTT]

"Pakistan didn't make nuke to show in new year celebration as Firecrackers "

tell me brother

what is the range of Nasr ?

where is it intended to be used ?

and what type of warheads it will use in such a situation ?

will pakistani establishment use neukes on indian tank columns which "will be " invading its own land to stop "if ever india initiates CSD" ?

think about it ...... its nothing but an old game where a aggresor person who is defeted by is much stronger enemy is trying to blckmail his opponent by pointing a gun to his own head ..... age app khud samjhdar ho sirji

 

[knight11]

Nasr missile is the result of the fetish our Generals have with that idiotic Cold Start doctrine of India.

Nuclear weapons are by definition strategic weapons; it makes no sense to marry them with a tactical delivery system.
-----------------------
A 70 km range missile just cannot be operated by a central command and control. In a war scenario, the missile has to handed over to field formation near the border e.g. IV Corps Lahore so that it could be used against the enemy.

Scenario 1: The Indian armor is concentrated near the border. A nuclear missile cannot be used preemptively before the armored formation starts its offensive. Nevertheless, to deter the Indian armor, Nasr has to handed over to the Corps deployed there. This would create a dangerous situation for a whole-scale nuclear war.

Scenario 2: The Indian armor has already jumped off from its assembly areas and has begun its offensive operation. Nasr could not be used again as it would be too close to our formations and cities.
--------------------------------
Why on earth would the Central Command deploy a delivery system that cannot be operated from deep within our borders. Why would someone risk a nuke to be placed along the border!!!!!!!

If a war breaks out, what would be the primary targets? Indian tanks or Indian Command and Control? Why would someone use nukes against tanks when he has the option to obliterate entire cities to deter the enemy.
-------------------
Would India be deterred with destruction of their armored divisions or their cities?

Scenario 2 the delimia of the local commander if the IA is closing quickly either to USE the weapon or to LOOSE them.

 

[sumoto]

bhai aap ka expert laga hua hay.. nasr ko tepu bata raha hayy... ham ne bhala kia kaha hay.

Lol don't worry your nuclear missile will not prevent India to annihilate pakistan.
You can try whenever you want to start nuclear war.

 

[dilpakistani]

Nasr will be no use... neither pakistan is going to deploy them in the battle and give authority to the local commanders nor they are going to fire.

Well if it is developed then it is going to be deployed...

 

[Hurter]

Ek to yeh Hindustaniyon ki pant geeeli hi hojati hai...

Your own man has given this statement.. This news has not come from GHQ Rawalpindi. Get a life Indians.. It's better to catch that person who wrote this article...

Your barking will not make any difference on PDF, Nasr missile's technology & our strategy. If the time comes, everyone will get to know about it. Till then, stop barking.