'Pakistan's Nasr missile is the most dangerous development in South Asia'

[volcano]

Yep but if inside Pakistan against aggressive forces.

yes i understand. But still it is a huge risk taking. Pakistsn doesn't have a credible nuclear second strike capacity. I don't think pakistani military will do such a gambling. So i believe it will either an all out nuclear 1st strike or no strike.But it all depends upon the situation. If dituation is so desperate, anything can happen.

 

[Nefarious]

Wow What a dangerous missile of 60 KM range. It is really a game changer since no such missile exist in Asia. LOL.

Your probably right, there's no other 60km missile armed with a nuke.

 

[Gauss]

I am 100% sure that Pakistan will denuclearize before we reach the halfway mark in this century. Lilliputians cant keep Gulliver indefinitely.

 

[volcano]

Yep but if inside Pakistan against aggressive forces.

yes i understand. But still it is a huge risk taking. Pakistsn doesn't have a credible nuclear second strike capacity. I don't think pakistani military will do such a gambling. So i believe it will either an all out nuclear 1st strike or no strike.But it all depends upon the situation. If situation is so desperate, anything can happen.

 

[al_asad_al_mulk]

yes i understand. But still it is a huge risk taking. Pakistsn doesn't have a credible nuclear second strike capacity. I don't think pakistani military will do such a gambling. So i believe it will either an all out nuclear 1st strike or no strike.But it all depends upon the situation. If situation is so desperate, anything can happen.

In that case Pakistan would not be blamed for starting a nuclear war, For your info Pakistan already acquired second strike capability long back.

 

[Sarjen29]

Ah, and just for the sake of it, how does it make Nasr of 'no use'. When you believe that it's meant to scare the enemy. which it seems to have done already (OP)

And no, it's not only meant to scare you. You're a bigger country with bigger force, The theory or a 'hollow threat' will be converted into action in any event of attack as part of cold start doctrine. We WILL use the force multipliers to limit indian gain, regardless of what you believe. We are hardly a match for your magnitude of force.

First who doesn't fear??? It's the fear that's going to make u plan well and act according to the situation. See on the top between a meaningfull discussion @Thunder Bolt goes trolling withought having a proper reply... anyway lets leave that.

Again No... Even with the cold doctrine IA will not threaten the existence of Pakistan. Don't think IA is fool to give Pakistan a opportunity use its nukes. And PA is not fool either to fire nukes on IA which lets India use all its resources. If full scale ( I'm only talking about limited war) war means there'll be no Nasr but agni and babur.

According to the OP if India lose petitions means it's not going to invade Pakistan but make a limited war thrust into P0K and destroy terror infa and pullback

 

[al_asad_al_mulk]

I am 100% sure that Pakistan will denuclearize before we reach the halfway mark in this century. Lilliputians cant keep Gulliver indefinitely.

 

[sumoto]

Lol not again.
Atomi supa powa.
All hail nasr.

 

[Foxtrot-Bravo]

Nasr will be no use... neither pakistan is going to deploy them in the battle and give authority to the local commanders nor they are going to fire.

Yup, we have made it to use as FireCrackers in religions and national events.

 

[ZAC1]

Full scale war btw pakistan and india is not going to happen.Super powers will not let it happen.
Small confrontation can happen.on conventional front both are of equal size and cannt do much to each other.
Nasr is just to stop day dreamers from dreaming.

 

[ATJ]

Nasr will be no use... neither pakistan is going to deploy them in the battle and give authority to the local commanders nor they are going to fire.

I guess you are wrong, if india tries to lauch a preemptive strike in the garb of actuall or stage managed Terrorist activity and Pakistan is caught off gaurded may be bcz of commitmemt of its forces on eastern border or for any other reason, i think you shouldnt be still thinking that nuclear msls wont be used, and remeber Nasr is a tactical nuclear missile , and tht means its tgts would surely be military forces.
Second, if india tries to go for hot pursuit ops inside pakistan, it would still be something near to impossible for them to remain below the nuclear threshholds of pakistan given the close proximity of psychological territories to international border and space senstivity of both countries. Secondly employing a tactical nuclear missile would be a befitting response aginst those forces tht have violated the international borders.
Comd and con can be debatable but it doeant matter here, what matters is would it be used or not.

 

[sumoto]

Lol always come to nuclear power.
Don't know why such attitude? I think they don't have any faith in their martial race army men.

 

[Side-Winder]

First who doesn't fear??? It's the fear that's going to make u plan well and act according to the situation. See on the top between a meaningfull discussion @Thunder Bolt goes trolling withought having a proper reply... anyway lets leave that.

Again No... Even with the cold doctrine IA will not threaten the existence of Pakistan. Don't think IA is fool to give Pakistan a opportunity use its nukes. And PA is not fool either to fire nukes on IA which lets India use all its resources. If full scale ( I'm only talking about limited war) war means there'll be no Nasr but agni and babur.

According to the OP if India lose petitions means it's not going to invade Pakistan but make a limited war thrust into P0K and destroy terror infa and pullback

The 'fears' and it's tools, have diverse objectives. You need to go find out exactly what objective a tactical nuke achieves, unlike a ballistic nuke. The very idea of tactical nukes will keep you from launching any sort of conventional attack be it limited or full. no matter even if 2 more mumbais happen.

 

[sumoto]

The 'fears' and it's tools, have diverse objectives. You need to go find out exactly what objective a tactical nuke achieves, unlike a ballistic nuke. The very idea of tactical nukes will keep you from launching any sort of conventional attack be it limited or full. no matter even if 2 more mumbais happen.

Lol then you are seriously day dreaming dude.

 

[RealNapster]

Wow What a dangerous missile of 60 KM range. It is really a game changer since no such missile exist in Asia. LOL.

Say LOL to your Experts who are making Nasr 'Tepu"