Only in Pakistan can one assume guilt without proving it in the courts.
To date, Nawaz has not been proven guilty of buying those flats with black money. He was jailed because "he must have" done
Well that is the NAB law. You can criticize the law but never its implementation. A law being implemented is a good thing. Even a wrong, draconian foolish law being implemented highlights that the legal system is not dead but working. Amending a legal system is far harder than amending a law.
He was judged guilty without proving the corruption.
Yes. That is now NAB investigation begins and its not just for him but for all. Under section 14 it highlights this clearly. Now you can begin to wonder why two civilian governments did not amend this despite having the power to do so and both of them have passed extremely serious and complicated laws. 18th amendment for PPP and 25th amendment for N.
Please do keep in mind that the NAB Ordnance requires the defendant to prove his/her innocence, not that the prosecution needs to prove him/her guilty. Quite the la
Yes section 14.. Its a joke bcz everybody has the fundamental right to be considered innocent until proven guilty. NAB law quite frankly should have been amended when such powerful governments were in power or the court itself should have striked it down.
Mind you I see that section being struck down in the future when these cases reach the supreme court.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/19/world/asia/pakistan-nawaz-sharif-released.html
It was entirely a premeditated plan to jail him and make him ineligible for elections just so the army's new puppet can come to power. A kangaroo court was initiated and he was removed from contention.
Now the High Court has pointed out that there's no proof of corruption in the Avenfield case, the reason why he couldn't contest elections.
He's been acquitted in the Flagship case, he was wrongfully imprisoned in the Avenfield case, and I'm pretty sure even the Al-Azizia Mills case is going to go up in smoke once the High Court realises he has no direct link to the company.
Let me explain.
The NAB court works on the law that a person against whom investigation has been taken must prove himself innocent. Thus it provided the order that Nawaz Sharif having failed to prove his innocence is guilty.
Whereas the high court works on the law that all are innocent until the prosecution proves the guilt with case laws such as the accused is the fav child of the court and that the prosecution must prove its case beyond a shadow of a doubt. With these principles and case laws in mind the high court accepted the appeal for hearing.
Now if you have studied these cases as you say you have you must have noticed that the supreme court under saqib nisar pointed out irregularities in the order types by high court which there were but upheld the order bcz the supreme court also followed its own set guidelines of responsibilities of prosecution and upheld the bail. Also the fact that an impugned order is not implemented...
Mind you he was already made ineligible for election under constitutional law..
In all of the above where due process was not followed..Due processes were followed everywhere. Difference in legal principles has created this contrast in court procedure but procedure were followed.
It is very easy to blame evil army victim Nawaz oh oh oh
But we must come to terms with a fact that the Parliament ignored this draconian law just as it ignored various sections in the constitution which were brought by the dictator but cry on others.. Why? Bcz it benefited the parties and the legislators..
It took the supreme court to bring up and strike down a law that made the parliament an autocratic organization that can pass any law it feels fit without any check or balance and through that it brought back the concept of judicial review something your own courts have done quite a few times..
That borderless law I speak of was brought by Zia..
Anyhow as I said its your opinion not a fact
What's done is done, and only the consequences remain. Now, what say you we talk about how the present government plans to deal with the rising inflation rate?
Agreed. Let's end this nab topic...
I personally don't see a strong policy to combat such inflation.. Let me tell you. Last month my electric unit price was
9.65 for day units
16.005 for night.
So some 490 units had a bill for 6.5k.
This month I got a shock.
My unit price were
14.380 for day
20.698 for night..
My bill on 564 units. 11574RS
Every govt that comes gives the mantra of pain on middle income and this will be short while only for five years to go by and you realize you have been duped. PPP did it. N league did it and imran is doing it. PPP faced a wipe out on its flawed economic policy. N has lost all provinces due to its flawed economic policy. Both targeted the middle income and now barely have seats for provincial setting. PTI is doing the same and it will meet the same fate if it doesn't bring forth a robust economic plan that doesn't involve taxing the hell out of the middle class.
How is it fair that the states incapability and ineptness is paid for by users who pay bills bcz the state doesn't have the guts nor the proper system to collect bills?
The govt rightly deserves every flak it gets on its economic policy bcz such increases and such bills will create anger and hatred for the party in power.
Gonna talk like an Aam admi. When I saw that bill and my meagre means I felt a rush of anger against the govt in power the likes of it I felt when ishaq dar was making policies and when zardari was crushing us all. A thought emerged which stated that they are all the same and our finance minister who was called the best thing since sliced break is more hyped up than Muhammad amir. :p
Imran Khan has the right idea. His refusal to back down from the decision to suspend the Haj subsidy (initiated by Nawaz Sharif), despite criticism from all political parties, suggests he's not averse to taking politically unpopular decisions. Of course ending the Haj subsidy isn't nearly as bad as some of the other potential measures that will have to be taken and it remains to be seen how much political capital he's willing to spend to push more painful reforms through.
Two things I couldn't believe we had.
Media subsidy in form of billion rupee ads and haj subsidy.