W.11
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 15,032
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
I could go on at further length describing other very necessary provisions that the 18th amendment is there to uphold, such as transparency and due-process in judicial appointments, and devolution of powers. On the subject of the latter, how many times have we seen members (rightfully) complain about underdevelopment of parts of Punjab in favour of others, or the neglect of Karachi, or other issues related to too much centralization of powers?
I'd suggest members actually read the the articles and amendments I've mentioned here before they rely on other sources to arrive at an anti-18th amendment conclusion.
Pakistan has a sham democracy, this s not a democracy but only a system where feudal lords/zamindars get into power by using their peasants and peasants choose the provincial governments, these land lords from rural areas get to rule the urban centers which has educated people and dont elect the same land lords as they get to be chosen in rural areas.
the true devolution can nt happen and has not been able to provide results since 12 years it has been implemented, 18th amendment has not been able to deliver to the people.
the provincial govt despite being given authority and powers dont reciprocate the same with the local govenrment which get appointments and their local representatives/ commissioners can be removed by the authority of the provincial CM or local bodies minister, same is the case of karach where a mayor can be removed by the provincial govt.
Musharraf system although dictatorial was probably much more democratic as it let poor people choose their representatives, or atleast at the local level and funds were distributed at the local level without provincial interference.
regards