Bilal Khan (Quwa)
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 97
- Country
- Location
I'm not blaming the British in as much as pointing out a fact: Our leaders come from a line of yes-men. They came to the top because they have the right mix of personality, qualifications, ambition (or lack thereof) and ability (or lack thereof). The British are no longer relevant, but the institutions and culture they have left thrives in Pakistan.rafiki bilal. good analysis.
but i would disagree with you on many points. You cannot blame the british.
Why is it that in many british colonies which inherited similar systems did better. Let us take Tanzania - we inherited the same but there was a major difference. I remember when we got our independence - there was a small university; best university around was Makrere - my father went there and so did I. But mwalimu Nyerere had very long visionary goals. First, he was a teacher. As a teacher, he knew the importance of education and educational institutions. Secondly, if we were to be subservient to the colonial masters, we needed to remove the elitism associated with language which is a curse in its own right. No English and there would be no english taught until secondary school. It achieved many things - gave people a self respect and an identity. Why is that not the case in pakistan. When any of your idiots PM, or anyone - they speak Urdu chafu (shit urdu) - pardon my swahili - now look any one of our leaders in any forum, you will hear them speak only our language including when we get Omani delegations - they speak here in swahili because it is a cultural bond with Zanzibar. Do you get any foreign dignitary coming and speaking in Urdu? Every flipping Pak national nowadays I meet here when they are speaking to each other are speaking like indians - 70% english words and these urdu. Third - no prominence for the army; they have a role and that is all. Because we were poor, to ensure noone was above - no television. If an ordinary person could not afford a TV, neither must a richer person. 4- land reforms, all land belongs only to to goverment period. A house you build here is on a 99 year lease; no ifs or buts. You pay for the land to the govt annually. You cannot own more than 1 home. 5. No dual nationality allowed. If you have you automatically forfiet Tanzanian nationality and will never be allowed to stand for public office.
Back then we used to look up at Pakistan as a more enlightened and progressive. Many friends went there to get high education. Now, the tide has reversed. We are seeing so many good skilled people migrating here as there are older family ties and you have freedom to do anything.
To prevent strife, Nyerere did something I always liked - one party state. He said until everyone is ready to admit that we can have healthy multi-party democracy; it is best to live without; noone person is too powerful - the president can easily be removed by the parliament if he gets out of hand.
If you get a chance, visit us here. You will be very surprised.
what these elites and army crooks need to fear is what happened in Uganda.
Same takataka. Museveni was leading a revolute; people just had enough and threw their support behind him. I see same narrative, if BLA amplifies its call to all the people of Pakistan to rise up and join them, we will see a total onslaught similar to north west of here.
The ones who rise the top can't think for themselves, nor are they creative, competent, or courageous. The ones who exhibit these three later characteristics are driven out of the system and, ultimately, end up in the West (thereby making the West stronger). The ones who are left end up giving us the same dull types over and over and over again.
I'll ask a simple question: Why is it our society keeps defaulting to demanding democracy? How is it that despite a thousand-plus years of Muslim rule before the British, we couldn't ideate institutions, policies, and political culture that emanates from our pre-colonial history? Why do we seek to copy-paste the legacy of the Western world (with its own distinct history, culture, and context) into ours?
The answer is simple: the ones running our show are functionally unable to think outside the box they've been coached into using.
I'd say every establishment works for its national interests. So, in India, the Indian establishment doesn't give a toss about the Indian people, but it cares about India's geo-political and security interests. Likewise for the Chinese, British, Americans, and so on. But in Pakistan, we have an establishment that doesn't even care about the national interest. They can't respect Pakistan, so why would any other country respect Pakistan?I completely agree…it’s basically a transfer of power that occurred in 1947. Power was shifted from the British to the bootlickers who supported British occupation back then.
This is why Pakistan’s “liberal” elite have a hard on against Imran Khan and PTI. They all gained privileges in this society Pakistan is today…why would they support its destruction?
They hate the middle class…and put on a fake ”liberal” persona to hide that.
I agree with this….
An “establishment” exists in every country. The difference is, it works for the people in other countries while in countries like Pakistan it works for a select few.
Last edited: