What's new

Pakistan's bomb has prevented war with India: AQ Khan

trident2010

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
Pakistan's bomb has prevented war with India: AQ Khan



WASHINGTON: Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has prevented a conventional war with India and made the "nation walk with heads held high", boasts notorious Pakistani scientist AQ Khan, considered the father of Islamabad's clandestine nuclear weapons programme.

"Our nuclear programme has ensured our survival, our security, and our sovereignty ... I am proud to have contributed to it together with my patriotic and able colleagues," the man accused of running a nuclear black market said in a published interview.

"Yes, I fully agree," he said in the interview published in the inaugural issue of " Newsweek Pakistan" when told that most Pakistanis believe Pakistan's being a nuclear state has served as a deterrent to conventional war with India.

Asked to comment on the popular theory that Pakistan is a nation with no sustainable identity, Khan said: "Pakistan was not an artificially created country. We, the Muslims in India, were a separate nation with a distinct culture, history, social order, and heritage."

"By any definition we were a nation. Unfortunately, selfish, narrow-minded leaders broke it into ethnic groups, which led to exploitation. Nuclear weapons made the nation walk with heads held high."

Rejecting fears that nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands as "a Western myth and one of their phobias," Khan said: "A nuclear weapon - good or dirty - is a highly complicated and sophisticated device. A large number of parts are needed, and expertise is required to assemble such a device."

"Even scientists and engineers without the relevant experience are not able to do this, let alone to talk of illiterate, untrained terrorists."

Describing the Afghan War as a blessing for Pakistan's nuclear programme, Khan said: "It was not that the Western countries actively supported it but that they were too scared and occupied with the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and its future consequences to actively oppose it."

"Neither the Americans nor the British had a clue about the status of our programme until 1990," Khan claimed. But After the Afghan War they slapped sanctions on Pakistan to extract concessions from Benazir Bhutto's government, but then president Ghulam Ishaq Khan and then Army chief Gen. Aslam Beg "frustrated their nefarious designs."

"The term 'Islamic Bomb' was mischievously coined by the Western world to frighten the rest of the world and to portray Muslims, and Pakistan, as terrorists who should not possess an atom bomb," he said as "The Western world is united in Muslim-bashing and ridiculing Islam and its golden values."



Pakistan's bomb has prevented war with India: AQ Khan - Pakistan - World - The Times of India
 
.
Pakistan's bomb has prevented war with India: AQ Khan



WASHINGTON: Pakistan's nuclear arsenal has prevented a conventional war with India and made the "nation walk with heads held high", boasts notorious Pakistani scientist AQ Khan, considered the father of Islamabad's clandestine nuclear weapons programme.

"Our nuclear programme has ensured our survival, our security, and our sovereignty ... I am proud to have contributed to it together with my patriotic and able colleagues," the man accused of running a nuclear black market said in a published interview.

"Yes, I fully agree," he said in the interview published in the inaugural issue of " Newsweek Pakistan" when told that most Pakistanis believe Pakistan's being a nuclear state has served as a deterrent to conventional war with India.

Asked to comment on the popular theory that Pakistan is a nation with no sustainable identity, Khan said: "Pakistan was not an artificially created country. We, the Muslims in India, were a separate nation with a distinct culture, history, social order, and heritage."

"By any definition we were a nation. Unfortunately, selfish, narrow-minded leaders broke it into ethnic groups, which led to exploitation. Nuclear weapons made the nation walk with heads held high."

Rejecting fears that nuclear weapons can fall into the wrong hands as "a Western myth and one of their phobias," Khan said: "A nuclear weapon - good or dirty - is a highly complicated and sophisticated device. A large number of parts are needed, and expertise is required to assemble such a device."

"Even scientists and engineers without the relevant experience are not able to do this, let alone to talk of illiterate, untrained terrorists."

Describing the Afghan War as a blessing for Pakistan's nuclear programme, Khan said: "It was not that the Western countries actively supported it but that they were too scared and occupied with the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and its future consequences to actively oppose it."

"Neither the Americans nor the British had a clue about the status of our programme until 1990," Khan claimed. But After the Afghan War they slapped sanctions on Pakistan to extract concessions from Benazir Bhutto's government, but then president Ghulam Ishaq Khan and then Army chief Gen. Aslam Beg "frustrated their nefarious designs."

"The term 'Islamic Bomb' was mischievously coined by the Western world to frighten the rest of the world and to portray Muslims, and Pakistan, as terrorists who should not possess an atom bomb," he said as "The Western world is united in Muslim-bashing and ridiculing Islam and its golden values."



Pakistan's bomb has prevented war with India: AQ Khan - Pakistan - World - The Times of India

War: Yes
Conflict: No

Case in point: Kargil CONFLICT

Moral of the story: When it comes to nukes, DON'T be over-optimistic. There's a limit to everything.
 
.
This is where i think india must invest heavyly on BMD. I think more than anythink that is the key area. If we can have multiple layers of BMD we will be secure enough.
 
.
This is where i think india must invest heavyly on BMD. I think more than anythink that is the key area. If we can have multiple layers of BMD we will be secure enough.

No matter how advanced your technology is, you can never be 100% sure.

Cmon yaar, there are millions of lives at stake how can you take even 0.0000000000001 % of risk?

In war, my friend, things seldom go according to plan.
 
.
No matter how advanced your technology is, you can never be 100% sure.

Cmon yaar, there are millions of lives at stake how can you take even 0.0000000000001 % of risk?
the objective of BMDs is protection of strategic installations.....a major economic centre....a military installation...etc....the U.S is in the process of fielding a laser based system and India is working on the KALI project....you are right that we cant risk millions of lives but I believe BMDs are for worst case senarios....
 
.
No matter how advanced your technology is, you can never be 100% sure.

Cmon yaar, there are millions of lives at stake how can you take even 0.0000000000001 % of risk?

In war, my friend, things seldom go according to plan.

Some is better than nothing.And that if that some thing is defensive unlike other weapons will be better especially when it is against nukes. No defence is fool proof but if we can achieve 80-90% shoot down chance it is a great thing to have.
 
.
the objective of BMDs is protection of strategic installations.....a major economic centre....a military installation...etc....the U.S is in the process of fielding a laser based system and India is working on the KALI project....you are right that we cant risk millions of lives but I believe BMDs are for worst case senarios....

I think I can agree with you on that. relying on BMD's for large-scale protection will be foolhardy.

When it comes to nukes, only protection we have is the little flesh God gave us between our ears. :coffee:
 
.
you know what's a more realistic reason why a full-on war with India hasn't happened? how about "because India does not invade other countries or start sh_t with their neighbors?"

what's the scoreboard stay on # of times India has been invaded vs. # of times India has invaded?

That's the real reason. even after numerous reasons, India hasn't gone to war. War is stupid. War hurts everyone. During Kargil India was lauded internationally for NOT escalating things or broadening the theatre of war.

Even after knowing that Pakistan only had enough fuel for another 9 days (or whatever) India let Pakistan off the hook.

Why?

Because India wants peace.

11 years ago India could have rolled over in their sleep and really hurt Pakistan. (and Pakistan would have fought back) Old men would have send young men to die all over South Asia. An entire generation would be lost. Both economies would have been hurt. No one would have 'won'.

Nukes haven't saved Pakistan from invasion. India's restraint has. And India will never invade Pakistan. Both nations should recognize this and spend a little more time talking, and a little less time trying to measure who has a bigger danda.
 
.
Yeah yeah you just finished nursery class.:lol:

Peace Sells no one buying...you need to do alot of research on this forum and in general on Pakistan.
Even a kids knows, nukes are the main factor to prevent full scale wars and saved nations with nukes to be invaded in the first place.
 
. .
india had the bomb way back in 1974 but didn't invade pakistan even after the moral booster of 1971 whereas pakistan tested it in 1997 n did kargil in 1999 in my opinion it was restrain by india which was responsible for no war with pakistan...................................
 
.
he is right in his every word..the day Pakistan tested its nukes the Indians in Chicago and NewYork closed their shops and went underground in fear of mob. The Indians in Saudi Arabia i remember very well started packing their bags just in case some angry Pakistani riots started. Rest of the world i dont know..so yes Pakistani nukes have balanced the power from every angle.
 
.
he is right in his every word..the day Pakistan tested its nukes the Indians in Chicago and NewYork closed their shops and went underground in fear of mob. The Indians in Saudi Arabia i remember very well started packing their bags just in case some angry Pakistani riots started. Rest of the world i dont know..so yes Pakistani nukes have balanced the power from every angle.

Why would Pakistani be angry? Shouldn't they be celebrating the nuke testing?

And what's with the mob story in Chicago and NY?
 
.
peacesells...Absolutely no personal attack on you. Recheck my post.
And try to be civilized in calling other member's name/ID
warmongers are on both sides.

Nukes haven't saved Pakistan from invasion. India's restraint has. And India will never invade Pakistan. Both nations should recognize this and spend a little more time talking, and a little less time trying to measure who has a bigger danda.

I am sure you are aware any move of Invasion will prompt the other party to use credible deterrence once and for all.
 
.
Well nuclear weapons are regarded as the biggest deterrence weapon of all, India's economic boost, massive military spending's are all insignificant when it comes to nuclear confrontation with Pakistan........ i have stated this a numerous times on forum but these statement receives little acknowledgment as the fighter jets fanboys love to see the scenario where fighter jets from both sides are engaged in BVR fights in a NUCLEAR ENVIRONMENT.........:cheesy:, limited conflict is always a possibility but it takes mere seconds to escalate. remember the 2001 standoff between India & Pakistan, I don't know about India but Pakistan had deployed Ghauri's then.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom