What's new

Pakistan's "battlefield" nukes risk nuclear war: IISS think tank

Edevelop

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
23
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
603433-pakistanmissileAFP-1379002706-712-640x480.jpg


LONDON: An arms race in South Asia and Pakistan’s development of tactical “battlefield” nuclear weapons are increasing the risk of any conflict there becoming a nuclear war, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) said on Thursday.

Noting that Pakistan looks set to overtake Britain as the owner of the world’s fifth-largest nuclear weapons stockpile, it urged India and Pakistan to improve their communications to avoid any fatal misunderstandings during a crisis.

The think tank cited Pakistan’s development of short-range tactical nuclear weapons – which in theory could be used to stop any conventional Indian armoured advance into Pakistani territory – as a particular cause of concern.

“The continuing expansion of Pakistan’s and India’s nuclear capabilities … create ever greater concern about an intensifying nuclear arms race in South Asia,” the IISS said in its annual strategic survey.

“Pakistan’s prospective introduction of tactical nuclear weapons increases the chance that a nuclear exchange will occur if a conflict breaks out, perhaps sparked by an act of terrorism,” it added.

Both India and Pakistan have brushed off Western concerns about their nuclear arsenals in the past, saying their only purpose is deterrence.

India signed a nuclear deal with the United States in 2005 effectively recognising it as a nuclear weapons state.

Radiation risk

Tactical nuclear arms – which can be used at close range on a battlefield – can increase the chance of an escalation, particularly if generals feel forced to use them to avoid them falling into the hands of advancing enemy troops.

India has said it will never start a nuclear conflict but has threatened a massive retaliation if Pakistan fires first. Deployed against an invading army, tactical nuclear weapons would cause serious radiation damage to any country that used them – a major reason why NATO countries eventually abandoned them as a counter to any Soviet advance during the Cold War.

“In such a scenario, parts of Pakistan’s densely populated agricultural heartland could become a nuclear wasteland,” the IISS said in an essay which gave unusual prominence to the South Asian arms race in the annual report.

Urging improved communications, the IISS noted that India and Pakistan had not engaged in significant nuclear risk-reduction talks since 2007.

And in contrast to relative strength of communications between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, no serving head of the Indian army had met his Pakistani counterpart since 1949.

India and Pakistan both publicly said they had tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

The two countries came close to war in 2001-2002 after an attack on the Indian parliament which India blamed on militants based in Pakistan.

Relations have been relatively stable since then – a ceasefire agreed in 2003 on the Line of Control in disputed Kashmir has mostly held, even after the 2008 attack on Mumbai by Pakistan-based militants which killed 166 people.

Tensions, however, have been rising again amid uncertainty in the region ahead of the withdrawal of most foreign troops from Afghanistan in 2014.

India’s foreign minister is due to hold talks with his Pakistani counterpart in Bishkek on Friday ahead of a possible meeting between their prime ministers on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly later this month.

Pakistan’s “battlefield” nukes risk nuclear war: IISS think tank – The Express Tribune
 
.
Because of our tactical nukes Indians will never ever think of invading.

And that is why we have them.

The British aren't neighbors with India so how can you expect them to understand, we are unfortunately and that is why we have to resort to such extreme measures to keep the Indian barbarian horde within their own territories.
 
. .
What choice do we have except to further develop our nuclear arsenal when there is significant imbalance between the conventional strength of armed forces in the subcontinent..:unsure:
 
. .
What choice do we have except to further develop our nuclear arsenal when there is significant imbalance between the conventional strength of armed forces in the subcontinent..:unsure:

Sure! In an armoured thrust by India, use the tactical nukes and Radiate your own Punjabi heartland.:yahoo:

We lose a couple of thousand soldiers while you lose millions to Radiation and poison your land for all times to come.

Typical Punjabi Muslim thinking. Cant see beyond your nose.

Because of our tactical nukes Indians will never ever think of invading.

And that is why we have them.

The British aren't neighbors with India so how can you expect them to understand, we are unfortunately and that is why we have to resort to such extreme measures to keep the Indian barbarian horde within their own territories.

Tactical nukes will have to be used on your own land if India invades. Ready to radiate your country for killing a few thousand Indian soldiers?
 
.
Neither India nor Pakistan owns tactical nukes. Both countries only have tactical nuclear weapons delivery capability so far.All this talk of battlefield nuclear weapons is nothing but hot air.
 
.
Neither India nor Pakistan owns tactical nukes. Both countries only have tactical nuclear weapons delivery capability so far.All this talk of battlefield nuclear weapons is nothing but hot air.

What do you think Nasr TMN missile is for? delivering candies? also prahaar is not under development n no news of it having the capability to deliver TMNs... nor india even has them.
 
.
India should withdraw from Kashmir and we can both put this nonsense behind us and start pumping this money into developing our nations.

Thats all it will take.

Pakistan being an artificial country taken from lands belonging to India, Afghanistan and Balochistan - if it divided and given up to its respectful owners will remove all the turmoil from the region - naa rahega baas na baghegi baasuri.

Thats the ideal solution for all the wars and terrorism in the region.
 
.
What do you think Nasr TMN missile is for? delivering candies? also prahaar is not under development n no news of it having the capability to deliver TMNs... nor india even has them.

This is hot air till India or Pakistan are able to miniaturise the nuclear warheads to a size below 3 feet radius... and that's a long shot ...a very long shot for any of them right now.
 
. . .
In my opinion we should stop focusing on our army and so much and develop our nation more.

We have already got India by the balls with our nukes... They know if they try something, their country will be uninhabitable for 5000 years...
 
.
India wont use it without you starting it...we still have the no first strike policy ...

Development is whats being talked about here not using it. Pakistan won't use any of these if India doesn't invade, so the ball is in the Indian court.
 
.
I want more 1000 Nukes for Pakistan so that all money goes their...:yahoo:
Currently Pakistan has the world's second highest number of children out of school and it will be first them..
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom