He hoped that Pakistan is likely to receive AWACS planes in November or October, adding India was given the same aircrafts which could lead to fresh escalation and arms race in the region.
Here's the video of that
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He hoped that Pakistan is likely to receive AWACS planes in November or October, adding India was given the same aircrafts which could lead to fresh escalation and arms race in the region.
well in these cases the comparison never gives you an authentic conclusion of which system is better! all we can do is to compare ther specs. the specs of SAAB Erieye systems have been disscussed over and over again but that of phalcons is not available in that much detail:
to start with, the israeli PHALCON AWACS are termed as one of the best AWACS system of the world. no such thing is claimed about the erieye but a point that must not be neglected is that the phalcon system is some 25 years old and the claim of "being the best" also date back to thst tim while the erieye is still a new and modren system with no history to tell us its real time abilities but still, it is a new system of the current time and not from the 80z.
as for the range, the erieye seem to have won some extra points here,
also form another article
also adding a report which stated
so it can be said that the detection range for a fighter plane is some where around 250 -300Km and a survelince range of about 400 -450 Km
for the erieye the dection range of a fighter size object is +350Km in a dense hostile electronic warfare environmentand general instrumental range is 450 Km. in addition it also have a sea surveillance mode.
as far as the platform carrying these radars are concerned, the indian are the winners here with superior russian plae with more speed, service celing and range!
so for conclusion, in my opinion both are equally good for there owners and our system definetly serves us the best and satisfy our needs!
i hope this comparison was helpfull and easy to understand for all the respected members!
regards!
Depends on how big the RCS of the aircraft is! An F16 is bigger than two square meter right?Quote:
"It can help monitor the military build-up, troop and aircraft movements nearly 200 km inside Pakistan while flying nearly 100 km inside your own territory," says Air Marshal A.K. Goel (retd IAF officer)this indicates the range being some where around +300 Km.
also form another article
Quote:
"Phalcon AWACS, for instance, will be able to detect a two square metre target from over 200 km away. Bigger targets can be spotted from 400 to 500 km away.
so it can be said that the detection range for a fighter plane is some where around 250 -300Km and a survelince range of about 400 -450 Km
for the erieye the dection range of a fighter size object is +350Km in a dense hostile electronic warfare environmentand general instrumental range is 450 Km. in addition it also have a sea surveillance mode.
Hehe, those specs are not even close. They are the ones for the previous generation of Phalcons. Also the Indian one is mounted on a much larger platform-a lot of extra things have gone in, apart from a bigger radar.well in these cases the comparison never gives you an authentic conclusion of which system is better! all we can do is to compare ther specs. the specs of SAAB Erieye systems have been disscussed over and over again but that of phalcons is not available in that much detail:
to start with, the israeli PHALCON AWACS are termed as one of the best AWACS system of the world. no such thing is claimed about the erieye but a point that must not be neglected is that the phalcon system is some 25 years old and the claim of "being the best" also date back to thst tim while the erieye is still a new and modren system with no history to tell us its real time abilities but still, it is a new system of the current time and not from the 80z.
as for the range, the erieye seem to have won some extra points here,
also form another article
also adding a report which stated
so it can be said that the detection range for a fighter plane is some where around 250 -300Km and a survelince range of about 400 -450 Km
for the erieye the dection range of a fighter size object is +350Km in a dense hostile electronic warfare environmentand general instrumental range is 450 Km. in addition it also have a sea surveillance mode.
as far as the platform carrying these radars are concerned, the indian are the winners here with superior russian plae with more speed, service celing and range!
so for conclusion, in my opinion both are equally good for there owners and our system definetly serves us the best and satisfy our needs!
i hope this comparison was helpfull and easy to understand for all the respected members!
regards!
The air chief said acquisition of spying satellite and AWACS by India had created an imbalance in the power in the region, in response to which, Pakistan would get an Air Warning and Control System (AWACS) by October.
Depends on how big the RCS of the aircraft is! An F16 is bigger than two square meter right?
What about the erieye do you have some numbers or links when it can detect a target of... square metre?
I think PAF erieye AEWs will be comparable to IAF AEW jv with Embraer, but the Phalcons should be more capable.
any information on it!
what are the upgrades??
I cant resist adding-the first dedicated Military communications satellite will also be launched next year.