What's new

Pakistani Woman Accused of ‘Blasphemy’ Illegally Held in Jail

.
And some kadri will kill CJ. This law is pathetic , i have seen muslim openly insulting pagan gods and idol worship. The law should be equal, if non muslin get punished for insulting islam,allah or muhammd, so does muslims, for insulting RAM or jesus.

Muslim openly use racist term Kafir, where as maleksh word is prohibited in India. Kaffir word must be banned by all muslim and non muslim country.


blasphemy law has jo place in progressive society. We are not living in arab age.

lol.. kaffir is not a racist term. It means 'someone who deny the truth'.

Anyway no one should display disrespect for other religions or their adherents. That doesn't do any good to any parties.
 
.
lol.. kaffir is not a racist term. It means 'someone who deny the truth'.

What truth? Whose truth?
Anyway no one should display disrespect for other religions or their adherents. That doesn't do any good to any parties.

That comes from the religion itself. If you start with the premise "that there is no god but...", not much can or needs to come after that. All downhill from there on.
 
.
That comes from the religion itself. If you start with the premise "that there is no god but...", not much can or needs to come after that. All downhill from there on.

Do you mean the very existence of Islam is a display of disrespect towards other religions and their adherents? Then sorry we can't help it. It's not our responsibility that Islam is a superior theology.
 
.
these kind of llaws give fodder to hardliners to survive....like one poster said if it has to b there in pak law book thn it shd cover all the religion equally..otherwise in first place it shudnt b there in my pov state and religion are two seperate entities..
 
.
lol.. kaffir is not a racist term. It means 'someone who deny the truth'.

Anyway no one should display disrespect for other religions or their adherents. That doesn't do any good to any parties.

can only mean that all you guys are kafirs
 
. .
Do you mean the very existence of Islam is a display of disrespect towards other religions and their adherents? Then sorry we can't help it. It's not our responsibility that Islam is a superior theology.

I was just pointing out that religions are inherently disrespectful of each others & therefore should not necessarily by covered under "we must respect all religions" cloak. My use of "there is no god but.." while also being true of Islam does not just stop there & is equally true of other monotheistic religions which is why i left the last part deliberately blank, i.e. fits many. Each of these religions is inherently disrespectful of each other & of course of the polytheistic & atheistic faiths or indeed complete non-believers..

As far as it being a superior theology or otherwise, I have no comments to offer on that score. You are welcome to your opinion as others are to theirs.
 
.
I really wish there was a government which said FU to the Mullahs and did abolish this law completely, not even change it.

Mullah has nothing to do with it. This thing is in Islam and has been practised for centuries. These Mullahs are our own creation.
 
.
Do you mean the very existence of Islam is a display of disrespect towards other religions and their adherents? Then sorry we can't help it. It's not our responsibility that Islam is a superior theology.

Islam is a great religion. YES it is. Superior? No it isn't. All religions are equal, all of them teach pretty much similar moral codes and ethics. Yeah there are differences no doubt. Doesn't make one better than the other.
 
.
first try to get consensus on this forum only.

Many absurd laws have been supported by the majority because of being stuck through cultural ties to those laws. Slavery and racial laws existed by the support of the majority. You have to power through the collective intellectual gap of the many at times and keep pushing the right thing over the wrong till the majority comes to agree with it.

Slavery fell, racism fell - this will too.

Mullah has nothing to do with it. This thing is in Islam and has been practised for centuries. These Mullahs are our own creation.

Question is whose Islam? What I learned was people throwing garbage at the Prophet and him forgiving them or the Quran which says "Lakum deenakum waliyadeen" (To you, your religion and to me mine). By definition all other religions are a blasphemy to yours, so if we kill for Blasphemy we will kill all and we will end up breaking the statement of the Quran in the process.

Blasphemy is nothing, its just words. Words have no value till they are believed. To get angry at the words is to gain some belief in those words. Words don't hurt. Yes if someone enforces you to go against your religion, fight back then. Don't go nuts on mere words.

lol.. kaffir is not a racist term. It means 'someone who deny the truth'.

Anyway no one should display disrespect for other religions or their adherents. That doesn't do any good to any parties.

Are you kidding me? The Prophet broke the idols and smashed them to prove a point that they can't even defend themselves let alone defend Makkah. The other's religion is meaningless, in order to prove that my religion is the true religion, I have to call the other's religion a false religion - call their Gods false, say that they are wrong, point out the absurdities of their belief.

These are all blasphemies from their point of view, but to promote my religion I have to do this.
 
.
I was just pointing out that religions are inherently disrespectful of each others & therefore should not necessarily by covered under "we must respect all religions" cloak. My use of "there is no god but.." while also being true of Islam does not just stop there & is equally true of other monotheistic religions which is why i left the last part deliberately blank, i.e. fits many. Each of these religions is inherently disrespectful of each other & of course of the polytheistic & atheistic faiths or indeed complete non-believers..

As far as it being a superior theology or otherwise, I have no comments to offer on that score. You are welcome to your opinion as others are to theirs.

Actually you derailed the discussion by missing context. When I talked about 'showing disrespect' it followed the comment below.

And some kadri will kill CJ. This law is pathetic , i have seen muslim openly insulting pagan gods and idol worship. The law should be equal, if non muslin get punished for insulting islam,allah or muhammd, so does muslims, for insulting RAM or jesus.

Muslim openly use racist term Kafir, where as maleksh word is prohibited in India. Kaffir word must be banned by all muslim and non muslim country.


blasphemy law has jo place in progressive society. We are not living in arab age.
 
.
Question is whose Islam? What I learned was people throwing garbage at the Prophet and him forgiving them or the Quran which says "Lakum deenakum waliyadeen" (To you, your religion and to me mine). By definition all other religions are a blasphemy to yours, so if we kill for Blasphemy we will kill all and we will end up breaking the statement of the Quran in the process.

Blasphemy is nothing, its just words. Words have no value till they are believed. To get angry at the words is to gain some belief in those words. Words don't hurt. Yes if someone enforces you to go against your religion, fight back then. Don't go nuts on mere words.

Dont try to start a munazara here. I can even quote Muslims drinking Alcohol.

And what you mean by whose Islam? You know there is something known as Ijma-e-Umat? And the Ijma-a-Umat is what you dont agree with

And what you mean by Dont go nuts on mere words? I think you dont know when some one is blamed for Blasphemy.
 
.
Dont try to start a munazara here. I can even quote Muslims drinking Alcohol.
So its their wish, if they are wrong, Allah will question them when the time comes.

And what you mean by whose Islam? You know there is something known as Ijma-e-Umat? And the Ijma-a-Umat is what you dont agree with

I can disagree with anyone I want to. Ummat's performance, morality isn't anything to be proud of. For one thing Ummat needs to be educated and learn new ideas within the contexts and boundaries laid out in the Quran of course.
 
.
Are you kidding me? The Prophet broke the idols and smashed them to prove a point that they can't even defend themselves let alone defend Makkah. The other's religion is meaningless, in order to prove that my religion is the true religion, I have to call the other's religion a false religion - call their Gods false, say that they are wrong, point out the absurdities of their belief.

These are all blasphemies from their point of view, but to promote my religion I have to do this.

See my post #27. Also it doesn't help attacking other religions without honest good intention, only to feed your ego. Even when you give dawah, it was advised to do that politely.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom