What's new

Pakistani Militry knows India is preparing for a war - Haroon Rasheed

compare with yourself with not russia, after 10 indian thermoneuclear burst in pkistan, nobody in pakistan will remain to further push button on war head.
on the other hand india have space capabilities, very good anti ballastic missils system, SU 30 mki sky dominance figthters, a great navy, long range agni i-v missiles. our delivery system is robust comparing to Pakistan.

First of all, India doesn't possess thermonuclear weapons, they are interested in it, and so is Pakistan. If India develops it, following policy of minimum deterrence Pakistan would follow suit. You people nuclearized this region in the first place, you started it, we didn't.
Secondly, 120 nukes of Pakistan are more than enough to wipe India off the map atleast 10 times over, no anti ballistic missile system will have a reasonable reaction time in the context of subcontinent, since both neighbours are located at a stone throwing distance, before your system is ready, Pakistan's missiles would have already hit their targets. Shaheen III covers 2750km, brings entire India along with Andaman and Nicobar islands into our hitting range, plus an assortment of other ballistic missiles , Pakistan possesses Babur cruise missiles which possess thrice the range of your Brahmos, along with that Pakistan Airforce possess Air Launched Cruise Missiles Ra'ad which would also be used to deliver Nukes if need arises. Pakistan wants peace in this region, the radical former RSS lunatic, sitting at the helm of affairs in your country , is more than welcome to try to coerce Pakistan, but the reaction would be swift, massive and unbearable for you guys, it will by all means never be a limited war, which your politicians and planners (in the state of a Modi Orgasm) are anticipating !!!
 
.
brahmi-thala-badudu.gif
almost all indians consider arnab as big headache to our media , drop of TRP ratings for his show is the big proof for tht

on the other hand most pakistanis love & dance to tunes of zaid hamid & qureshi lol
Nayak260.gif
 
.
The way your TV debates are done in Pakistan realy worries me . Who started all wars ? A simple question a basic question while talking about history .

Not only india all nations will prepare for war anf keep their force updated . Its called defence . But if Pakistan wont stop provocations which it keep exposing its ugly side to entire world india wont wait any time to go for counter .
1971 was India boi
 
.
Hope for the best, Prepare for the worst.

We know Moodi wants another shoot out.
 
.
compare with yourself with not russia, after 10 indian thermoneuclear burst in pkistan, nobody in pakistan will remain to further push button on war head.
on the other hand india have space capabilities, very good anti ballastic missils system, SU 30 mki sky dominance figthters, a great navy, long range agni i-v missiles. our delivery system is robust comparing to Pakistan.
The way your TV debates are done in Pakistan realy worries me . Who started all wars ? A simple question a basic question while talking about history .

Not only india all nations will prepare for war anf keep their force updated . Its called defence . But if Pakistan wont stop provocations which it keep exposing its ugly side to entire world india wont wait any time to go for counter .



And yiu and tge speaker agree covert operations and proxies are the way forward to punish ? Wow man thsts entire nation got brainwashed with suicidal tendency while world has no patients with terror . Even chinese will bang you later


Wow nuclear nuclear nuclear .

India warns Pakistan of infiltration - Nuclear

UAE takes a jib at Pakistan betrayal - nuclear

Iran warns Pakistan of infiltration - nuclear

Afghanistan warns of infiltration and safe heaven for terror - Nuclear ...


Seriously ?
You would be an idiot to believe that if the tension escalates into a war between India and Pakistan, it would be conventional war. And then spotting your lies (which is typical trait of being an indian) Pakistan would never warn UAE or Iran with nuclear threat....rather we bear the allegation for helping Iran in building one. There could never be a direct conflict between Pakistan and UAE but a hindu devdasi will spread the lies as often as it is taught.
 
.
This nincompoop Haroon Rasheed is yet another glorious example of idiocy. He has a few nick names mentioned below for the information (and amusement:p:) of Indian members of the forum:
Chacha Kuppi
Chacha Tatterri
Askari Malshiya (Military Masseur)
Kayani ka Khabba Tatta (left testicle of General Kayani)
---------------
This guy is certainly not to be taken seriously.
 
.
These what Indian think in their heart and afraid of Pakistan becoming strong and powerful so they always wants to down play the threat.
But always try to find opportunities to hurt Pakistan like helping Baluch,TTP and MQM to destroy Pakistan capacities to fight India and destroy the economy but after CPEC India is seeing it's dream destroying in front of her eyes and now frustrated and doing daily firing in the LOC and blaming Pakistan .
World knows Indian chutiyapa"s and frustration and laugh at her poor acting LoL


Watch 9:00 minutes onwards.


Extract:
  • Pakistani military knows that India is preparing for a war
  • India had attempted this several times before, including in 1987, 1989 and 2001 and they are itching for it again.
I cannot agree more with this analysis.

Economic Corridor
Attacking Pakistan was a soft wish until China and Pakistan went under strategic Economic Corridor which will enable china to encircle India. With Pakistan becoming Chinese economic hi-way, Chinese stake in Pakistan will be too high to let India do any misadventure in future. So more India delays, the most expensive it would become to attack Pakistan.

The passage for trade and expansion
It is in India's best interest to initiate a war and cut off Pakistan from the China and also create a road link towards Europe and Central Asia by extending its border to Afghanistan. India has asked for a road-link times and again and denied by Pakistan every time. Cutting Pakistan from China and Kashmir will also put a full-stop to Kashmir libation movement and enable India to expand in region and economy.

Strength gaining Pakistan
Pakistan's own economy is back on track. National reserves are going up, stock markets are performing and international investors are willing to pump money in. A prospering Pakistan will first eat a share of potential Indian growth but it will also make Pakistan militarily more stable, stronger and challenging. So more you delay, the more challenging Pakistan would be.

Countering Pakistan's Counter Attack
Pakistan is seen supporting Kashmiris, Sikhs and other libation moments in India on an unprecedented scale to avenge what it went through. "Punishing" Pakistan before it punishes India is the right way to go.

Pakistan - too big of a country in Indian neighbourhood
Pakistan is a "too big of a country" as compared to other Indian neighbours (except China) and India has managed other small countries well because they cannot stand as challenge. Pakistan keeps popping up in India's way and challenges its hegemony, a smaller Pakistan will be more acceptable neighbour.

Absence of covert force
India has lost its covert war against Pakistan; in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan's terrorism problem is down the drain. In the absence of covert controllable arm, India cannot gain any ground indirectly, leaving option for more direction operations when required.

Kashmir a hindrance to UN Security Council seat
India can also not get a UN permanent seat unless Kashmir dispute is resolved - and India would want to resolve it so it would benefit it instead of costing it. What if it makes Pakistan negotiate a part of its lost territory to India for giving up claim on Kashmir?

Fighting one war at a time to escape two-front war scenario
A haunting war scenario is in which India would have to fight a two-front war with two nuclear armed neighbours. Would it not be great to incapacitate one (Pakistan) so there is no two-front scenario any more...? Specially at a time when the other neighbour (China) is more at peace?

Most of the reasons existed before but their intensity has increased in the last 12-18 months. The tipping point is Economic Corridor and Chinese rain of investment which is going to change landscape of this area - all worse for India. Strategically, it is in India's best interest to undergo a war and gain grounds before it is too late. Repercussion of delaying are not "lost opportunity of attack" but equally an "increased threat" from its opponents - both China and Pakistan.

This is my analysis but Allah knows the best.
 
. .
Watch 9:00 minutes onwards.


Extract:
  • Pakistani military knows that India is preparing for a war
  • India had attempted this several times before, including in 1987, 1989 and 2001 and they are itching for it again.
I cannot agree more with this analysis.

Economic Corridor
Attacking Pakistan was a soft wish until China and Pakistan went under strategic Economic Corridor which will enable china to encircle India. With Pakistan becoming Chinese economic hi-way, Chinese stake in Pakistan will be too high to let India do any misadventure in future. So more India delays, the most expensive it would become to attack Pakistan.

The passage for trade and expansion
It is in India's best interest to initiate a war and cut off Pakistan from the China and also create a road link towards Europe and Central Asia by extending its border to Afghanistan. India has asked for a road-link times and again and denied by Pakistan every time. Cutting Pakistan from China and Kashmir will also put a full-stop to Kashmir libation movement and enable India to expand in region and economy.

Strength gaining Pakistan
Pakistan's own economy is back on track. National reserves are going up, stock markets are performing and international investors are willing to pump money in. A prospering Pakistan will first eat a share of potential Indian growth but it will also make Pakistan militarily more stable, stronger and challenging. So more you delay, the more challenging Pakistan would be.

Countering Pakistan's Counter Attack
Pakistan is seen supporting Kashmiris, Sikhs and other libation moments in India on an unprecedented scale to avenge what it went through. "Punishing" Pakistan before it punishes India is the right way to go.

Pakistan - too big of a country in Indian neighbourhood
Pakistan is a "too big of a country" as compared to other Indian neighbours (except China) and India has managed other small countries well because they cannot stand as challenge. Pakistan keeps popping up in India's way and challenges its hegemony, a smaller Pakistan will be more acceptable neighbour.

Absence of covert force
India has lost its covert war against Pakistan; in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan's terrorism problem is down the drain. In the absence of covert controllable arm, India cannot gain any ground indirectly, leaving option for more direction operations when required.

Kashmir a hindrance to UN Security Council seat
India can also not get a UN permanent seat unless Kashmir dispute is resolved - and India would want to resolve it so it would benefit it instead of costing it. What if it makes Pakistan negotiate a part of its lost territory to India for giving up claim on Kashmir?

Fighting one war at a time to escape two-front war scenario
A haunting war scenario is in which India would have to fight a two-front war with two nuclear armed neighbours. Would it not be great to incapacitate one (Pakistan) so there is no two-front scenario any more...? Specially at a time when the other neighbour (China) is more at peace?

Most of the reasons existed before but their intensity has increased in the last 12-18 months. The tipping point is Economic Corridor and Chinese rain of investment which is going to change landscape of this area - all worse for India. Strategically, it is in India's best interest to undergo a war and gain grounds before it is too late. Repercussion of delaying are not "lost opportunity of attack" but equally an "increased threat" from its opponents - both China and Pakistan.

This is my analysis but Allah knows the best.
Nice one......
Kashmir will be battle zone again.......
 
.
you are mistaken let me correct you after the nuclear attack i don't think anyone would be left to call his country by the name India rather maybe small states shall be created trying to prosper and i don't think in it there will be a hindu state maybe khalistan or some muslim state or maybe a buddhist state but no hindu state and don't worry about us Pakistanis Islam itself is a nation and we are in majority and in every part but there is only one india which speaks for hindus and by destroying it hinduism is done and we muslims will be still existing and prevailing

My deluded friend, do you think India stores its nukes in public places like sitting ducks? Any country with assured second strike capabilities will hide well its nukes. Its your country whose second strike capability is questionable, not India's. Doesn't your madarssa teach common sense to you. India has already clarified that any nuclear attack will be responded with disproportionate massive retaliatory nuclear strike. I you nuke india, consider yourself to be killed in like 25-30 mins. 72 virgins for all the pakistanis will be waiting for them.:rofl::rofl:

Second, If islam is a country then why are there 60 odd islamic nations in the world?? And if you believe so much in Islamic unity, why doesn's saudi arabia allows even muslims from other countries to be its citizens, no matter what kind of service and for how long you give to them. Only Islam is a religion which keeps on talking about the extinction of other religions rather than living in peace and harmony with others. Your post is an example of such islamic values and thinking. And you call islam a peaceful religion. When there is no body else to kill, you kill yourselves.:disagree::disagree:

Pathetic. No wonder your religion is looked down by civilized world.:disagree::disagree:
 
.
Well we Pakistanis also need to focus other than Kashmir on the fact that there are other regions where muslims are unhappy. Just convincing them to rebel would make India's hands full. On the other hand it is my wish and dream that my region or regions be transferred to Pakistan. Lucknow, Hyderabad, Assam muslims, many of them favor Pakistan and are waiting for India to disintegrate.

If we had wise policy we would have tried to Pakistanize these muslims left there and work to make them an asset for Pakistan. Despite this not being policy my nana and many muslims like him to this day support Pakistan. I would advise my Pakistani brethren not to forget the asset they have in Indian occupied parts. Azad Deccan Movement and Rohillakhand liberation movement are movements that are aligned with Pakistan to this day. Some want merger with Pakistan, others a separate state.

I for one want my land, Lucknow to go to Pakistan just as Waz wants Kashmir to go to Pakistan. Do not forget us because we will fight till the last breathe for Pakistan.
 
.
We don't have that much on stake.... But If do that mistake Pakistan should go for all out attack..... We should make sure that if we go 100 years back India will go 101 years back after this war.
 
. .
A war can't benefit either of the side. Despite being victorious in 1971, Bharat lost a lot of financial resources. Later, the opposition leaders in Bharati politics heavily targeted Indira Gandhi with criticism for the financial loses she inflicted on the Bharati economy in the war of 1971.

The ratio/proportion between Pakistan and Bharat is not like that of America and Iraq. Despite no ration/proportion with Iraq and Afghanistan, American economy has suffered from insufferable loses. Can Bharati afford such loses?
 
.
My deluded friend, do you think India stores its nukes in public places like sitting ducks? Any country with assured second strike capabilities will hide well its nukes. Its your country whose second strike capability is questionable, not India's. Doesn't your madarssa teach common sense to you. India has already clarified that any nuclear attack will be responded with disproportionate massive retaliatory nuclear strike. I you nuke india, consider yourself to be killed in like 25-30 mins. 72 virgins for all the pakistanis will be waiting for them.:rofl::rofl:

Second, If islam is a country then why are there 60 odd islamic nations in the world?? And if you believe so much in Islamic unity, why doesn's saudi arabia allows even muslims from other countries to be its citizens, no matter what kind of service and for how long you give to them. Only Islam is a religion which keeps on talking about the extinction of other religions rather than living in peace and harmony with others. Your post is an example of such islamic values and thinking. And you call islam a peaceful religion. When there is no body else to kill, you kill yourselves.:disagree::disagree:

Pathetic. No wonder your religion is looked down by civilized world.:disagree::disagree:


Whether india stores nuke for public or for looking like a sitting duck that maybe you know but :) Pakistan has a first use policy and it won't be a limited one LEFT !! for second strike capability rather all shall be thrown at once so after that even if we are done i don't think you will also be existing and it maybe your temples who teach about nuclear or you will be left for second strike but our madrassah don't they only teach Islam not nuclear warfare as for 72 virgins we will get more than that don't know what will you ppl get as there are so many idols of your's maybe they will start fighting each other over which one will keep u in his heaven (MADE OF IDOLS AND ROCKS)






pathetic! pathetic i believe is that religion which is not being adopted by anyone whereas Islam is a religion which is spreading worldwide and i don't see hinduism being spread worldwide it explains alot about your word pathetic and which one is that
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom