'Pakistani' killed ex-Afghan president: Karzai Administration

[sohailbarki]

Exactly, a Muslim cannot kill another Muslim.He will be a brainwashed Hindu trained by RAW in one of the Indian consulates in Afghanistan.

Yes may be.....

 

[TaimiKhan]

Ok fine, lets assume he was a Pakistani.

Question is, how did a Pakistani carry the bomb all by himself into the highest security zone in whole of Afghanistan, mind it he was was a Pakistani in Afghanistan, by passing all the security arrangements consisting of Afghan security forces, US forces and NATO ones, reach its target in the diplomatic enclave area and then blow up the target right in his house.

Mind boggling. This can't be done by anyone without the active support of inside help, and the inside help was massive, not just one or two individuals, but on a larger scale. And by looking at the high profile deaths in last few months of some of the important Afghan officials, it seems something is up and Taliban are not doing this all by themselves nor is ISI that powerful to infiltrate or by pass the Afghan intel security apparatus, CIA, US / NATO forces.

 

[MilSpec]

Ok fine, lets assume he was a Pakistani.

Question is, how did a Pakistani carry the bomb all by himself into the highest security zone in whole of Afghanistan, mind it he was was a Pakistani in Afghanistan, by passing all the security arrangements consisting of Afghan security forces, US forces and NATO ones, reach its target in the diplomatic enclave area and then blow up the target right in his house.

Mind boggling. This can't be done by anyone without the active support of inside help, and the inside help was massive, not just one or two individuals, but on a larger scale. And by looking at the high profile deaths in last few months of some of the important Afghan officials, it seems something is up and Taliban are not doing this all by themselves nor is ISI that powerful to infiltrate or by pass the Afghan intel security apparatus, CIA, US / NATO forces.

sir,
I may be wrong here but in in my personal opinion ISI's network in afghanistan is unbreakable, and it controls peace and violence alike in kabul.

Please do not insult the competency of ISI.. If ISI could infiltrate afghan mujhahideens with shoulder fire stingers into kandahar and kabul with the presence of the red army ..i am pretty sure getting a sucide bomber inside kabul would have been a piece of cake. Especially with the terrific network of taliban assets cultivated in last 20 years.. it is practically ISI's playground. Today the most potent force in afganistan is not NATO or taliban.. its actually the ISI

 

[53fd]

sir,
I may be wrong here but in in my personal opinion ISI's network in afghanistan is unbreakable, and it controls peace and violence alike in kabul.

Please do not insult the competency of ISI.. If ISI could infiltrate afghan mujhahideens with shoulder fire stingers into kandahar and kabul with the presence of the red army ..i am pretty sure getting a sucide bomber inside kabul would have been a piece of cake. Especially with the terrific network of taliban assets cultivated in last 20 years.. it is practically ISI's playground. Today the most potent force in afganistan is not NATO or taliban.. its actually the ISI

And when even Obama says the US does not have credible intelligence proving any of this, you keep harping on those conspiracy theories?

 

[President Camacho]

The bomber was identified as Mullah Ismatullah. A Taliban emissary, he was designated as the messenger of peace offering on the behalf of Quetta Shura by Hamidullah Akhund.

Hamidullah Akhund, who is in custody of Afghan officials, once headed the Ariana Afghan Airlines when Afghanistan was under Taliban control.

It was the same time when Al Qaeda extensively used the airline to ship drugs and weapons between Afghanistan and a few African countries.

Hamidullah Akhund, who sent the audio message, is not a nobody in Taliban. Quite reputed, and known for long, he was very well trusted by Rabbani and Stanikzai to be the genuine interlocutor between the Taliban and the NA.

 

[Awesome]

sir,
I may be wrong here but in in my personal opinion ISI's network in afghanistan is unbreakable, and it controls peace and violence alike in kabul.

Please do not insult the competency of ISI.. If ISI could infiltrate afghan mujhahideens with shoulder fire stingers into kandahar and kabul with the presence of the red army ..i am pretty sure getting a sucide bomber inside kabul would have been a piece of cake. Especially with the terrific network of taliban assets cultivated in last 20 years.. it is practically ISI's playground. Today the most potent force in afganistan is not NATO or taliban.. its actually the ISI

So the lack of an explanation means ISI is so good that its impossible to prove anything against them so we just accuse them for the fun of it.

Also this is not a claim by Al Jazeera, its merely reporting what the Karzai Administration has said.

 

[TaimiKhan]

sir,
I may be wrong here but in in my personal opinion ISI's network in afghanistan is unbreakable, and it controls peace and violence alike in kabul.

Please do not insult the competency of ISI.. If ISI could infiltrate afghan mujhahideens with shoulder fire stingers into kandahar and kabul with the presence of the red army ..i am pretty sure getting a sucide bomber inside kabul would have been a piece of cake. Especially with the terrific network of taliban assets cultivated in last 20 years.. it is practically ISI's playground. Today the most potent force in afganistan is not NATO or taliban.. its actually the ISI

This is called over exaggeration. If ISI's network is unbreakable, then definitely it has good local support which by the way does not seems to be as per what the Afghans & Indians say and by looking at the demonstrations done against Pakistan. So, i wonder how does someone have a good local network in a foreign country without local population support. Sheer exaggeration i would say. Had ISI been so much effective, it would have controlled the violence in its own country and would have stopped the killings of hundreds of its own men in the process.

And as for stingers, they were not used within the city limits during the soviet occupation, rather were used outside of the city limits since many air bases were near the city limits and aircraft when coming in for landing used to be on the landing approach thus prone to getting attacked due to their low altitude flying.

Getting a suicide bomber in the city may be a piece of cake, but then getting him into the highest security protected area by the elite Afghan forces, CIA, NATO & US forces, close to the US embassy is not a piece of cake. Either such attacks are allowed deliberately, knowingly or someone from inside was involved.

Taliban with control of 70% of Afghanistan, support of local tribes / people, being funded through American tax payers money and Gulf / Arab money is the real force, not the ISI.

 

[53fd]

The bomber was identified as Mullah Ismatullah. A Taliban emissary, he was designated as the messenger of peace offering on the behalf of Quetta Shura by Hamidullah Akhund.

Hamidullah Akhund, who is in custody of Afghan officials, once headed the Ariana Afghan Airlines when Afghanistan was under Taliban control.

It was the same time when Al Qaeda extensively used the airline to ship drugs and weapons between Afghanistan and a few African countries.

Hamidullah Akhund, who sent the audio message, is not a nobody in Taliban. Quite reputed, and known for long, he was very well trusted by Rabbani and Stanikzai to be the genuine interlocutor between the Taliban and the NA.

Aren't Mullah Ismatullah & Hamidullah Akhund Afghan nationals?

 

[Awesome]

This is called over exaggeration. If ISI's network is unbreakable, then definitely it has good local support which by the way does not seems to be as per what the Afghans & Indians say and by looking at the demonstrations done against Pakistan. So, i wonder how does someone have a good local network in a foreign country without local population support. Sheer exaggeration i would say. Had ISI been so much effective, it would have controlled the violence in its own country and would have stopped the killings of hundreds of its own men in the process.

And as for stingers, they were not used within the city limits during the soviet occupation, rather were used outside of the city limits since many air bases were near the city limits and aircraft when coming in for landing used to be on the landing approach thus prone to getting attacked due to their low altitude flying.

Getting a suicide bomber in the city may be a piece of cake, but then getting him into the highest security protected area by the elite Afghan forces, CIA, NATO & US forces, close to the US embassy is not a piece of cake. Either such attacks are allowed deliberately, knowingly or someone from inside was involved.

Taliban with control of 70% of Afghanistan, support of local tribes / people, being funded through American tax payers money and Gulf / Arab money is the real force, not the ISI.

I mean the audacity of this BS story is that a Taliban guy comes to meet a freakin ex-President and no one bothers to see if he has a bomb strapped onto him?

I have my doubts on the official story of his killing.

 

[Alchemy]

The question also is at the motive at this stage and who was the biggest beneficiary at Rabbani's death ???

 

[mohsinkid]

Whole world is controlled by ISI ..it is soo much powerful that it controls every affair in Hindustan,US,Afghanistan ,UK ,etc and the armies/agencies of those countries are always selling or eating channa chaat when they are attacked.. LOL .
whenever we say of mining and fencing the border they blame us for commiting human rights violation and they can themselves drone attack anywhere esp right after APC conference resolution was passed :S

 

[anonymus]

NEWS!!!!!!Hardly