SarthakGanguly
BANNED
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
- Messages
- 18,416
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
If the Hindus are threatened and feel refuge in India is their only way, I will at least welcome them here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hindus of Pakistan are as much Pakistani as you are, don't act like school kid.
Defination of yours is comes from western scholars prespectives ideas different from what native point of view is all though diffrent from this.as for abiding contitution it was never practically implemented in india never in the case of bangladeshi immigrants of 1971 please do a case study on this on groundThe name hindustan is not because of hindu religion.. In persian language the land beyond 'Indus' is called hindu region.. And philosophy originated in hindu called hindu philophy.. Religion based on hindu philosophy called hindu religions (budhism, jainism, hindu etc.)..
Hindu means not an indian citizen.. For eg. Nepal is a hindu country, hindus with citizenship of diff countries.. If a man (hindu ya muslim) apply for refugee status ya indian citizenship.. There are procedures according to our constitution .. Be4 our constitution (secular) all religions are same..
Your fathers and great grand fathers have tried doing something similar and failed miserably.
Bcoz BD is a friendly country. Pakistan is an enemy nation. Plus for people coming from Pakistan (irrespective of religion), there is a risk of polio virus as wellIf illegal bangladeshi can be welcomed then why not hindus being tortured in pakistan??
Most Indians are bigots and I would not expect them to accept any foreign into their society, Hindu, Muslim or otherwise, all Indians can do is give lip service and then retract their statement, several Indian pdf members made hospitable gestures when news of Hindu persecution hit pdf but now we can see that the ground realities are different....
Your generalization is akin to me saying, Most Pakistanis are islamic fundamentalists/Terrorists.. Not good...
If we have put forth our hand of assistance to other countries, there is little reason not to do the same in case of Pakistan. But this should be done with a sense of liberalism and not as a vanguard of any particular minority.
"Division of the subcontinent was the biggest blunder in the history of mankind" Altaf Hussain.
Sad that the Hindus of Pakistan are its latest victims.
then stop asking for referendum in Kashmir as its not 1950.What Jinnah said was for all Muslims of subcontinent who were willing to join it and those who joined Pakistan were welcomed . And BTW that was in 1947, the year for decision. Those who opted for becoming Indians joined India in 1947 so NO they are NOT welcomed NOW.
Indeed. BUT the issue is that Indian Hindu members talk about giving citizenship to Hindus around the world
no that's 180 million one way tickets to PakUnlikely oh delusional one. You have nearly 180 million in your backyard. Like I said better get started.
Great post.
Its still very much not done with a sense of liberalism nonetheless. When Indians don't like Pakistanis sticking their nose in their business why should they bother to reciporcate in the same fashion?? If Indian Muslims aren't the concern of Pakistan then Pakistani Hindus shouldn't be theirs as well.
But India is still an asylum for refugees from states other than Pakistan. My point is if India can extend hand towards Congo and Iraq, why not Pakistan? Given the fact that it had granted asylum to a considerable number of Pakistani Hindus up to 2005. Why didn't we hear much hue and cry in Pakistan then about this matter? It was not a matter of poking nose in Pakistan's internal matter then, I guess?