Pakistani Forces kill 15 Terrorists Trying to Cross into Iran

[Mamadouso]

He is a Shia and loves Iran more than Pakistan. Talking to him is useless. He is just giving one line meaningless statements that do not hold any credibility. He is clearly an Iran apologist.



We are far better than Shia Iran who literally delivered money and troops to Syria in-order butcher Syrian civilian sunnis. But clearly you support that since Sunnis were exterminated.

I don’t understand why Shia only look to Iran government as their only influence. The situation was not this bad before Iranian revolution 1979, it is Iran’s fault it has mixed government and religion so much.

Why can’t the Mullah regime just separate religious leadership from politics and most of these loyalty issues will be resolved?

 

[Path-Finder]

He is a Shia and loves Iran more than Pakistan. Talking to him is useless. He is just giving one line meaningless statements that do not hold any credibility. He is clearly an Iran apologist.

making remarks against shia should be avoided. Pakistan does not delve into sectarianism and neither should you. he is not and iran apologist because he has been accused of being a saudi apologist many times before. He is just giving his views.

 

[pakpride00090]

as i said Pakistan believe in legitimacy of Mandate.

which in Yemen your parliament refused to help with.

Government relations in Syria are legal matters.

you see the world as empires of sects and tribes. its not this simple

I don't but Iran and Shias do.

making remarks against shia should be avoided. Pakistan does not delve into sectarianism and neither should you. he is not and iran apologist because he has been accused of being a saudi apologist many times before. He is just giving his views.

Shias are not special , neither are sunnis or any other sect. If you act against Pakistan and have more loyalty to someone else than Pakistan then you should be criticized . Shias who love Iran more than Pakistan and work for the interest of Iran should be criticized.

 

[El Sidd]

I don't but Iran and Shias do.

leave them to their own fate then

 

[pakpride00090]

I don’t understand why Shia only look to Iran government as their only influence. The situation was not this bad before Iranian revolution 1979, it is Iran’s fault it has mixed government and religion so much.

Why can’t the Mullah regime just separate religious leadership from politics and most of these loyalty issues will be resolved?

Most shias in Pakistan consider Iran to be a de-facto shia state. It is just what American Jews think of Israel.

Most people for the sake of peace won't talk about Pakistani Shia loyalty to Iran , but everybody knows it is the truth.
Ask Shias in Pakistan to criticize Iran and you would get the same answer American Jews will give you when you will ask them to critisize Israel.

leave them to their own fate then

I want to but they must stop meddling in Pakistan's affairs. They can kill , rape and murder each other all they want. I don't care but they must not interfere over here.

 

[El Sidd]

they must not interfere over here.

once again i request you to hold the government responsible for not upholding the law

 

[Path-Finder]

I don't but Iran and Shias do.



Shias are not special , neither are sunnis or any other sect. If you act against Pakistan and have more loyalty to someone else than Pakistan then you should be criticized . Shias who love Iran more than Pakistan and work for the interest of Iran should be criticized.

not all shia, not all sunni. don't want a sectarian crisis on our hands either. The state needs to make its policy clear that people be it shia fighting for iran or sunni fighting for some gulf nation ought to be eliminated.

 

[El Sidd]

making remarks against shia should be avoided. Pakistan does not delve into sectarianism and neither should you. he is not and iran apologist because he has been accused of being a saudi apologist many times before. He is just giving his views.

i am like mandir ka ghanta. jo chahay baja jaye

 

[mangekyo]

regarding the rants of Solemani

General Sulemani must leave the diplomacy to someone of the caliber of Mohammad Javad.
granted we have issues with India but Pak Afghan issue is due to American invasion and the international terrorism.
we don't have issue with China and neither with Iran.
his ill thought rants are pointless because Pakistan has ruled out any support to the American planned invasion on Iran but if such rants become a state policy then there are anti Iran elements inside Pakistan that will push the government to support any such American invasion inside Iran

Soleimanis statements are not official statements. His statements are usually taken out of his speeches that he holds after prayers. It's just a way to silence angry masses and keep them happy. Otherwise they will start to think that Iranian leaders are weak and inable to act.

To the rest of you:

Congratulations for making this thread about Pakistani Shias vs sunnis fight.

 

[El Sidd]

silence angry masses and keep them happy

i am still here.

so you are telling there are angry masses of iranians who believe Pakistan to be a wahhabi Proxy?

Mods can you please ban this salafist. In every single thread about Iran, he spews sectarian hatred.

@Dubious @Irfan Baloch

i thought you were against sectarian infighting

 

[mangekyo]

i am still here.

so you are telling there are angry masses of iranians who believe Pakistan to be a wahhabi Proxy?

Yes Shia extremists, just like Sunni extremists in Paksitan believe Iran is Shia boogeyman.

i thought you were against sectarian infighting

I am, did my post reflect something else?

 

[El Sidd]

Yes Shia extremists, just like Sunni extremists in Paksitan believe Iran is Shia boogeyman.

but why is your iranian armes Forces chief intent on keeping them happy?

I am, did my post reflect something else?

there are no salafists in Iran?

 

[mangekyo]

but why is your iranian armes Forces chief intent on keeping them happy?

Did you forget what happened when a couple of Iranians attending prayers were unhappy in 1979?

there are no salafists in Iran?

He is not Iranian. Read his comments about Iran and you will see he is a salafist

 

[pakpride00090]

Soleimanis statements are not official statements. His statements are usually taken out of his speeches that he holds after prayers. It's just a way to silence angry masses and keep them happy. Otherwise they will start to think that Iranian leaders are weak and inable to act.

To the rest of you:

Congratulations for making this thread about Pakistani Shias vs sunnis fight.

What kind of stupid excuse is it ... Turning a neutral and pro-Iran , Pakistan Government into an anti one.

 

[El Sidd]

Did you forget what happened when a couple of Iranians attending prayers were unhappy in 1979?

So you threat like Soleimani too i should assume?

He is not Iranian. Read his posts about Iran and you will see he is a salafist

Why dont Iran legislate to ban Salafis as they have done with Scientologists?