What's new

Pakistan wouldn’t let India be a friend in need

Isaq Khan

BANNED
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
463
Reaction score
0
Pakistan wouldn’t let India be a friend in need

I have a few questions for Pakistan’s elected rulers. Why have they let pass the “tragic opportunity” of floods that uprooted millions across that country— rather than using it to create bonding between our people and building trust between governments?

Why are they averse to Pakistanis breaking the Indian bread in their hour of need? Or what made them ask New Delhi route assistance (US $ 25 million) through the UN rather than sending it directly to Islamabad? Our PM called theirs. Foreign Minister S M Krishna spoke to Pak counterpart Shah Mahmood Qureshi. But they remained cussed. Unresponsive.

Imponderable of India-Pak relations mired in deep hostility. That’s what it looked to me.

The hurt was all the more unbearable when one saw Pak TV channels beaming footage of planes-load of relief material arriving from Vietnam, Turkey, China, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

The irony was lost completely on the Pak media, its rulers and even the bureaucracy. How much easier would it have been to let trucks full of vegetables, wheat, sugar, medicines, tents, blankets and other such relief driven into Pakistan from India via the Wagah check-post.


Barring stray voices, the point got lost in the Pakistani talking space controlled by India baiters. The Pak Mission in New Delhi had no instructions on how or whether to accept relief offers even from common citizens and voluntary groups.:hitwall::hitwall:

Having agreed at Thimpu to find ways to build trust between our two countries, will Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani explain why his government failed the peace agenda by keeping people apart in this hour of crisis? Can he think of a better confidence building measure than Islamabad and New Delhi together serving the flood victims— taking them as citizens of South Asia?

I am certain these questions will never fetch a considered response. The malaise lies in misplaced national pride that in Pakistan is driven by the baggage of history, the establishment’s militarist mindset and the political myopia of right-wing parties.

They don’t mind celebrating Anjelina Jolie as the face of UN’s appeal for the flood affected. But they have problems accepting money raised by Indian NGOs and peace activists who could have enlisted similar support from Bollywood stars with huge fan following in Pakistan.
:agree::agree:

Responding to my mubarak message on Eid, Pak television anchor Hamid Mir wrote back asking: “I’ve had many from India greeting me this year. Is it the impact of Indo-Pak unity on the tennis field (read the US Open where Rohan Bopanna and Aisam-ul-Qureshi captured headlines by reaching the double’s final)?”

Yes and no, I thought. It has less to do with tennis and more with the devastation wrought by floods. Listen to India’s heartbeat Hamid and play it loud on your channel. Or else there wouldn’t be any asha for aman.

Pakistan wouldn?t let India be a friend in need : Separated At Birth
 
.
Whats your problem?I thought you guys did not trust GOP when it was dealing with Mumbai issue but all of sudden you guys trust GOP now with aid even though we're saying redirect it to UN which will handle it far more efficiently.Just goes to show what your real intentions are behind aid.
 
.
Whats your problem?I thought you guys did not trust GOP when it was dealing with Mumbai issue but all of sudden you guys trust GOP now with aid even though we're saying redirect it to UN which will handle it far more efficiently.Just goes to show what your real intentions are behind aid.

Cmon man, you don't have to reply stupidity with more stupidity.
 
.
Whats your problem?I thought you guys did not trust GOP when it was dealing with Mumbai issue but all of sudden you guys trust GOP now with aid even though we're saying redirect it to UN which will handle it far more efficiently.Just goes to show what your real intentions are behind aid.

The problem is that GOP doesnt want to let people know that India had helped them during their hour of need, they are cheating their own people by not letting them know where the aid came from. Hopefully, it could have been a start of some sort of trust between people. But it seems carrying on the animosity between people suits the GOP just fine, even if it is at the cost of their citizens.
The reasons are misplaced national pride that will be hurt if any help was accepted by Pakistan from India.

Understood the problem?
 
. .
We have reservations on india aid, because india can never be our friend, rather its friend of anti Pakistan powers like Israel and some other counteries who want to Wipe out Pakistan from the map of the world.. so thats why Pakistan is not accepting direct aid from India despite of a huge natural clamity that submerged 1 3rd of our country
 
.
but that should not bother you no?You donated in good faith for people - Why should it bother you or did you donate for propaganda and psy ops?

psy ops:lol: I like that.

but that should not bother you no?

No, that should bother you because your government is holding back information that you should know...whatever the Indian intention is doesnt matter. However GOP's intention seemingly is not to let any trust develop b/w people. They want to keep the anti-India wave going because that is one of the main plank of most Pakistani mainstream political parties; and to achieve that they even stoop to duplicitous lying.
 
.
We have reservations on india aid, because india can never be our friend, rather its friend of anti Pakistan powers like Israel and some other counteries who want to Wipe out Pakistan from the map of the world.. so thats why Pakistan is not accepting direct aid from India despite of a huge natural clamity that submerged 1 3rd of our country

So how does accepting aid indirectly remove the reservations? What purpose does it serve other than not let people know who helped them?

rather its friend of anti Pakistan powers like Israel and some other counteries who want to Wipe out Pakistan from the map of the world

Did somebody teach you all that or you just have an extraordinarily creative mind??
 
.
but that should not bother you no?You donated in good faith for people - Why should it bother you or did you donate for propaganda and psy ops?

So in other words you wanna say that china have hidden agenda or doing it for some thing else. Because if china really wants to help why not divert it through UN?? as per ur own theory.
 
.
The aid we sent reached the victims it was intended for. Thats enough. No need to politicise it. If they didnt want their citizens knowing we helped, its their business.

Be happy that the aid reached those who needed it. A true humanitarian mission doesn't NEED personal recognition.
 
.
but that should not bother you no?You donated in good faith for people - Why should it bother you or did you donate for propaganda and psy ops?




Because the problem is some dumb people will deny later that India gave any aid to pakistan during floods.

So publicity is important here.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom