Here's a reminder to everyone here, Imran Khan was the same person who insisted that talks should be used to engage the TTP, and that a large scale military operation (i.e. now Zarb-e-Azb) should not be launched against them.
Aren’t you at least a little worried that India might have second strike capability?
I ask this question as an outsider who is not familiar with the second strike capabilities of Pakistan or India
India does have it. And Pakistan's nuclear policy is pretty clear: won't back down from first use if push comes to shove.
Imran Khan is one of those guys who thinks everything and anything can be solved with talks (if that were true, he wouldn't have been divorced 2 times) and is the ultimate 'peace loving guy' who thinks of everything foreign through a moral lens and everything domestic through a logical lens (expects Muslim countries to assist on the basis of Islamic brotherhood i.e. Ummah even though there are clear disadvantages for them, and domestically is choking the population with lots, lots of taxes and nothing in return because that's the logical way out of an economic crisis although not exactly moral).
Strange person. He advocated against a military operation (i.e. Now complete, Zarb-e-Azb) against the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, and said we should engage in talks instead although all talks before had failed. The operation, costly and lots of effort, proved to be effected as Terrorism was curbed very, very greatly.
But he still persists in his narrative of 'only talks.'
Maybe because that has become symbolic of him, and he finds recognition in that, and has moretheless attached his "honor" (intellect, ideas and ways of going forward with stuff) with it.
we pakistaniz are ready to be nuked and nuke india the hell out with us. Go for it anytime
