ask any women she will choose gladly to die than to be raped and stay alive specially by Indian ugly men-
I'm curious, have you actually asked that to a lot of women? Or is it just your own statement that you are attributing to "any woman"?
Rape is a horrible crime and I hate to talk about it here, since it has been brought up (by a TTA, no less) only for mudslinging the neighbour. But since that's the level of discourse here, I might as well pit in.
A vast majority of rapes are perpetrated by threatening the life of the woman. A knife or other blunt weapon is held against her throat, and she is frightened into non-resistance while the men rape her. In the US, the weapon is usually a pistol. The women have no choice but to yield to the rapist, since she (like anybody else) values her life, and wouldn't want to die and leave her children orphaned or parents childless. Your contention that every woman would choose death over rape is simply not true.
BTW those last few words of yours betrays an all too common ignorance about rapes. You think the attractiveness of the rapist plays a part in the victim's plight? You think it is any better, even by an iota of a fraction of a percent, for a woman (or man) to be raped by a handsome stud? You think the rapist's appearance is in any way relevant? If you do, then you are subconsciously subscribing to the idiotic notion that women sometimes enjoy rape.
It doesn't matter if the rapist is ugly or handsome, Indian or Pakistani. Rape, by definition, is a violation of the woman's or man's right to her or his body.