Pakistan withdraws official from High Commission in Dhaka

[Pak_Sher]

Joy Hasina

Hasinas dictatorship will end. The Bangladeshis I know hate her.

 

[SrNair]

and why not yet we kicked out a dark @ss bengali from islamabad as tit for tat?

Arre Imran Bhai that was a little bit of racism.

They called him back because he was in danger. Right now, with AL in power, who knows what would happen. From what I have heard, the BD security forces have had to increase security for Pakistani staff in BD. AL is deeply populist, and has shown that it is deeply anti-Pakistani, using anti-Pakistani rhetoric to gain political clout with the hard line nationalists, who've been calling for BD to expel Pakistani missions from the country.

This is not something that can simply be handled with a complaint. Evidence is needed, because if he is found to be doing something illegal while under Pakistani flag, then that is grounds for prosecution in Pakistan, perhaps even treason.

AL have their own reason to hate Pakistan.You know that.
Anyway he might did something anti national in there.Pakistan wont allow expelling one of their officials without any evidence.

 

[ExtraOdinary]

Hasinas dictatorship will end. The Bangladeshis I know hate her.

Then we will find another dalal , BD is full of them

 

[trident2010]

running a few call centres doesn't exactly translates into playing on the world stage.

No, but running terrorist camps inside pakistan seems to keep you playing.

 

[That Guy]

Arre Imran Bhai that was a little bit of racism.



AL have their own reason to hate Pakistan.You know that.
Anyway he might did something anti national in there.Pakistan wont allow expelling one of their officials without any evidence.

If the host nation requests it, then the hosted has no other choice. This isn't about who would or wouldn't allow it. Diplomacy dictates that requests such as these be obliged. Though in this case, it looks more of a forced expulsion rather than a request.

Never proven?

How does one prove an allegation against a Diplomat?
A diplomat has immunity from prosecution. A Host country can but expel the diplomat..which they did.

The fact that a huge amount of RDX was found from his home is proof enough of him being involved in terrorist activities.

Immunity has nothing to do with evidence. See, this is why avoid replying to you, because you say silly things, and try comparing apples to oranges.

Pakistan has little choice but to call it baseless etc. This guy wasn't moonlighting with fake Indian currency. Part of his job description, not about to get into trouble in Pakistan because of it.

Or perhaps this is politically motivated considering bd's current political climate. There is little reason to believe bd's narrative, since they gave given 0 reasons to.

 

[asad71]

1. Hasina/BAL is under siege. This is another dying kick.
2. BD and Pakistan are both faced with a rising Hindu extremism/militancy and Akhand Bhrat expansionism. Both are targets of ethnic cleansing of Muslims from SA.
3. Hasina is a passing bird. In matters of national security both BD and Pakistan are natural allies. SM has understood that. So did Zia, Ershad and BKZ.
4.BD Intel being of limited capacity,ISI and MSS ought to involve themselves in BD more vigorously to oust/eliminate RAW from BD.

 

[ares]

If the host nation requests it, then the hosted has no other choice. This isn't about who would or wouldn't allow it. Diplomacy dictates that requests such as these be obliged. Though in this case, it looks more of a forced expulsion rather than a request.


Immunity has nothing to do with evidence. See, this is why avoid replying to you, because you say silly things, and try comparing apples to oranges.


Or perhaps this is politically motivated considering bd's current political climate. There is little reason to believe bd's narrative, since they gave given 0 reasons to.

Replying to me or not is your prerogative, saying 'silly' things or not is mine.

Evidence is brought forward in court of law. Which judges the authenticity of the evidence provided by the prosecution.

Whom to present evidence too?..and who will judge if its authentic or not? Who ? Pakistani govt?

But Pakistani govt is already biased in this case, they have already dismissed the Bangladeshi claim.

Sending a diplomat back is a big deal, governments do not do that, unless they have compelling reason do it.

 

[RAMPAGE]

.
n we keep exposing them to the world,,,while sending 10 competent persons to Afghanistan for u

Hi Kid! no matter how much you pretend, you'll never play in the big leagues.

 

[halupridol]

Hi Kid! no matter how much you pretend, you'll never play in the big leagues.

hello uncle,long time no see,,,,,,yes we r still far from the big leagues but we need not be there to beat u in this cat n mouse game.

 

[That Guy]

Replying to me or not is your prerogative, saying 'silly' things or not is mine.

Evidence is brought forward in court of law. Which judges the authenticity of the evidence provided by the prosecution.

Whom to present evidence too?..and who will judge if its authentic or not? Who ? Pakistani govt?

But Pakistani govt is already biased in this case, they have already dismissed the Bangladeshi claim.

Sending a diplomat back is a big deal, governments do not do that, unless they have compelling reason do it.

Evidence and science are indisputable when presented properly. Thus, your entire argument is flawed. Evidence isn't just brought forth in the courts, you don't even seem to know what evidence ever means.

 

[kadamba-warrior]

And BD continues it's fall towards becoming an Indian satellite state. Under AL, BD continues to lose it's sovereignty.

By not letting Pakistan run its terror activities in their country against their own national interests, BD is losing its own sovereignty? Just because it didn't serve your interests?

I am amazed at the Pakistanis' feeling of entitlement of spreading terror -- even from other countries.

 

[That Guy]

By not letting Pakistan run its terror activities in their country against their own national interests, BD is losing its own sovereignty? Just because it didn't serve your interests?

I am amazed at the Pakistanis' feeling of entitlement of spreading terror -- even from other countries.

Sure, let's automatically believe every allegation made against Pakistan. The roti I burned this morning? It's the fault of the ISI. Do you read your own comments before you post them? Stop allowing your nationalism to cloud your judgement.

 

[kadamba-warrior]

The news state that he was arrested outside, and as soon as the individual steps outside the premise of the diplomatic office he can be arrested if he does not enjoy diplomatic immunity. The story does not make any sense what so ever, but lets for argument sake believe that he was engaged in illegal activities, than shame on the authorities for letting him go. This made a mockery of the Justice System of Bangladesh, as far as i am concerned he should have been hanged.



Nops, to any reasonable person this would be absurd. An individual who was caught engaging in illegal activities without any diplomatic immunity was not arrested and tried, now that is a mockery of the Justice System.

Instead of turning every news story into a conspiracy-story-telling hour, don't you think is it remotely possible that BD still considers Pakistan a friendly nation and hence let him off with just a WARNING?

After all, the dude was alleged to be running subversive activities mainly against a kufr India, no? And it is not as if BD and Pakistan are engaged in pitched battles with one another.

Sure, let's automatically believe every allegation made against Pakistan. The roti I burned this morning? It's the fault of the ISI. Do you read your own comments before you post them? Stop allowing your nationalism to cloud your judgement.

Hey Mr.ThinkTank, read up the OP and multiple links provided thereafter about his involvement in subversive activities! Its not as if I have made everything up here. It is not my problem if everything appears as a conspiracy theory for you guys!

Nevertheless, we are not talking about Iceland here to immediately give you the benefit of doubt!

 

[ares]

Evidence and science are indisputable when presented properly. Thus, your entire argument is flawed. Evidence isn't just brought forth in the courts, you don't even seem to know what evidence ever means.

Ohh really, do tell, who or what ascertain authenticity of the evidence provided.

We sent bundles of dossiers with evidence regarding your involvement in 26/11. You state department discarded it, terming it as mere 'literature'.

You can keep shouting, it is Indian conspiracy on top of your voices.

But the fact of the matter is your diplomats are being expelled by third countries because of their links with terrorists and knowing your country's history of association with terrorists, hardly any one doubts these reports.

 

[kadamba-warrior]

Ohh really, do tell, who or what ascertain authenticity of the evidence provided.

We sent bundles of dossiers with evidence regarding your involvement in 26/11. You state department discarded it, terming it as mere 'literature'.

You can keep shouting, it is Indian conspiracy on top of your voices.

But the fact of the matter is your diplomats are being expelled by third countries because of their links with terrorists and knowing your country's history of association with terrorists, hardly any one doubts these reports.

And, why is so hard for Mr.ThinkTank to understand that BD might have let the dude off with a WARNING because Pakistan still enjoys a friendly relationship with BD? Don't friendly nations do that with one another?

Why should it be another conspiracy theory when all the available reports suggest otherwise?