What's new

Pakistan willing to use nuclear weapons to ensure its survival if necessary

Oh but you do here a refresher:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indi...nuclear-sites-in-next-surgical-strike.521608/
On Indus water again here:
https://www.dawn.com/news/1298707

There is nothing you can claim that Pakistan does and India does not. India has repeatedly showed its intent to use force against Pakistan, even went as far as to hit our nuclear installations. What do you think will be our reply in case India does strike our nuclear installations?

Does the Air Chief said that he will nuke Pakistan? What he said that before Pakistan can use nukes on India, he is going take them out.

As on waters, the treaty was safe even after 4 wars between India and Pakistan. Until Modi, India never threatened to divert waters flowing into Pakistan. Even Modi threatened only once that too after Uri. He never issues weekly threats to Pakistan.
 
.
lol khawaja Asif is such a good laugh. I love how he threatens to nuke people if even his tea is cold. He's a corrupt swine, but every time he talks about nuclear weapons I can't help finding him funny. It's like Trumps tweets.

So far his nuclear shit list has India and Israel on it. The man has done more for the Palestinian people with 1 tweet than ISIS could dream of. It's so odd, but memorising, like watching a car crash.
 
.
LOL, at the Title.

The use on nukes for the survival, will mark the end of Pakistan for sure. :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
You attacked Kashmir, expecting a resistance in Kashmir by IA limited to J&K.

But we decide to attack Lahore. And push back in J&K.
And what does that have to do with a nuclear war now?

Posturing on both sides, any full scale nuclear war by Pakistan and India will destroy huge parts of the world, let alone just Pakistan and India. Read about nuclear winters and fallout, India won't survive, Pakistan won't survive, heck a lot of Asia won't survive. Not so easy nuking your neighbour

LOL, at the Title.

The use on nukes for the survival, will mark the end of Pakistan for sure. :rofl::rofl::rofl:
And India, which is the point of a deterrent. Even India can't nuke Pakistan without suffering itself.

Even in the best case scenario that Pakistan won't be able to nuke much of India (and is destroyed), the spread of radiation and impact will mean the end of India in 10 years at most
 
. .
But what if India destroys Pak nuclear sites and Pak is left with only a handful of tactical nukes?What good will it be?
How will India destroy all nuclear sites? Even if Pakistan isn't able to nuke much of India, these nukes aren't just games, they will destroy and spread radiation far beyond the original target.

I would suggest Indians read this well research article.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00963402.2017.1338009?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Any Indian who thinks they'd "win" a nuclear war is an idiot. Even Bangladesh and Nepal would be affected by the fallout, let alone just India and Pakistan.
 
.
And what does that have to do with a nuclear war now?
You got to read back few conversation and understand what I meant.
Posturing on both sides, any full scale nuclear war by Pakistan and India will destroy huge parts of the world, let alone just Pakistan and India. Read about nuclear winters and fallout, India won't survive, Pakistan won't survive, heck a lot of Asia won't survive. Not so easy nuking your neighbor
We are not the one who follows a first strike policy.

Your policy is a vague policy too. The first two are acceptable, it is a war like situation.
But the later means, if Pakistan in anyway goes into an economic or social security trouble in the future, it'll use Nuclear weapons by blaming India for it.
  1. If India conquers a large part of Pakistan;
  2. If India destroys large parts of Pakistan’s army or air force;
  3. If India tries to strangle Pakistan economically;
  4. If India tries to destabilizing Pakistan politically, including by creating large scale internal subversion.
 
.
You got to read back few conversation and understand what I meant.

We are not the one who follows a first strike policy.

Your policy is a vague policy too. The first two are acceptable, it is a war like situation.
But the later means, if Pakistan in anyway goes into an economic or social security trouble in the future, it'll use Nuclear weapons by blaming India for it.
They're working if it stops you from doing it :D :D
 
.
And what does that have to do with a nuclear war now?

Posturing on both sides, any full scale nuclear war by Pakistan and India will destroy huge parts of the world, let alone just Pakistan and India. Read about nuclear winters and fallout, India won't survive, Pakistan won't survive, heck a lot of Asia won't survive. Not so easy nuking your neighbour


And India, which is the point of a deterrent. Even India can't nuke Pakistan without suffering itself.

Even in the best case scenario that Pakistan won't be able to nuke much of India (and is destroyed), the spread of radiation and impact will mean the end of India in 10 years at most

Seriously, why do you want to hyphenate Pakistan's stupidity with what India may think or do ???? Only a fool will think about using a nuclear weapon for his survival. And Indian is certainly not the one. :p:

They're working if it stops you from doing it :D :D

Any do you believe that by your nuclear policy, Pakistan somehow managed to stop India from doing point 3 & 4 as mentioned by @SOUTHie ???? Then god may help your country. :disagree::disagree::disagree:
 
.
+
768904-atomic-bomb-evolution-funny-minimalistic-nuclear-explosions-yellow-yellow-background.jpg
+1
 
.
6_7811559.jpg

(Photo: Reuters, 247Sports)



Pakistan is ready to use nuclear weapons against India, a senior Pakistani official confirmed on Monday.

Appearing on the Pakistani television channel “Geo,” Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said that [3] Islamabad is willing to use nuclear weapons to ensure its survival.

“We should pray that such an option never arises, but if we need to use them (nuclear weapons) for our survival we will,” Asif said, according to Geo’s website. His remark was widely reported by Indian media outlets.

Asif went on to accuse India of supporting anti-Pakistani terrorist groups in a proxy war against Islamabad. “Fuelling terrorism directly or indirectly is India’s proxy war in Pakistan,” Asif said. He singled out Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the Pakistani Taliban, and Baloch separatists as two of the groups that India is allegedly supporting.

Asif’s statement about Pakistan’s willingness to use nuclear weapons is in line with Islamabad's long-standing nuclear doctrine. In contrast to India and China, which both maintain no first use nuclear doctrines, Pakistan has always maintained that it could resort to nuclear weapons to blunt a conventional attack from India.

Nor is Asif the first high-level Pakistani official to threaten to use nuclear weapons. Former President Pervez Musharraf issued a similar threat [4] (albeit, after he left office), when he stated: “We do not want to use nuclear capability but if our existence comes under threat, who do we have these nuclear weapons for?”

More tellingly, in an interview back in 2002, Lt. Gen. Khalid Kidwai, the first head of the Strategic Plans Division (SPD), which is responsible for Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, outlined four scenarios where Pakistan would consider using nuclear weapons against India:

  1. If India conquers a large part of Pakistan;
  2. If India destroys large parts of Pakistan’s army or air force;
  3. If India tries to strangle Pakistan economically;
  4. If India tries to destabilizing Pakistan politically, including by creating large scale internal subversion.
Notably, in his interview this week, Asif seems to suggest that India is doing the fourth scenario by supporting terrorist groups inside Pakistan.

Pakistan has backed up its rhetoric by creating an operational nuclear force capable of making good on its threats. For example, when Indian officials began discussing a Cold Start doctrine—in which Indian forces would make quick and limited incursions into Pakistan in response to Islamabad-supported terrorist attacks in India—Pakistan began developing tactical nuclear weapons to thwart such attacks.

In 2011, Pakistan first tested its Hatf-9 (Nasr) missile [5], which it referred to as a “Short Range Surface to Surface Multi Tube Ballistic Missile.” The statement announcing the test elaborated: “NASR, with a range of 60 km, carries nuclear warheads of appropriate yield with high accuracy, shoot and scoot attributes. This quick response system addresses the need to deter evolving threats.”

It went on to add that “the test was a very important milestone in consolidating Pakistan’s strategic deterrence capability at all levels of the threat spectrum.”

It has continued to test the Nasr missile in the years since, including using firing it in four missile salvos using a “state-of-the-art multi-tube launcher.”

Earlier this year, Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Vincent R. Stewart, the director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, confirmed that Pakistan is continuing to build up a tactical nuclear weapons force. In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February, Stewart said: “We anticipate that Pakistan will continue [its] development of new delivery systems, including cruise missiles and close-range ‘battlefield’ nuclear weapons to augment its existing ballistic missiles.”

https://scout.com/military/warrior/...e-Nuclear-WeaponsShould-India-Worry-109876924
That statement goes to India as well
 
.
Does the Air Chief said that he will nuke Pakistan? What he said that before Pakistan can use nukes on India, he is going take them out.

As on waters, the treaty was safe even after 4 wars between India and Pakistan. Until Modi, India never threatened to divert waters flowing into Pakistan. Even Modi threatened only once that too after Uri. He never issues weekly threats to Pakistan.
You threatened to to strike our nuclear installations. What do u think happens when a nuclear facility is struck?
That is equivalent of using a nuclear weapon because of the radiation fallout.
And what does this Pakistan uses them? Pakistan isnt the one attacking india so the question of Pakistan using nukes does not arise. On the contrary its india that has repeatedly threatened to attack Pakistan, even developed a doctrine for it. You are in no position to question what Pakistan does after you attack Pakistan. How we chose to respond india cannot dictate.
 
.
Actually its a compliment to Indian Armed forces, ..... Oh we cant face you, you will lead to our destruction and our survival chances are Nill.
DONT DARE DO IT I HAVE NUKES................

Indian Armed Forces are almost 2.7 Million whereas Pakistan's are 1.1 Million. Indian Armed forces budget is 58 Billion USD whereas Pakistan's is 8 Billion USD. Still Pakistani forces fight bravely but they have to get ready for worse which is that in case of any attack that threat survival of Pakistan, Pakistan should make sure it takes india down along with itself. Pakistan knows it won't survive nuclear war but nothing more bigger than taking down your enemy with you.
 
.
Great title....Pakistan will use nukes for "survival"...lol
 
.
That's actually very defensive approach... I would like them to change it to offensive posturing... nuke can be last or first resort...
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom