What's new

Pakistan willing to discuss Shakil Afridi’s release with Trump

. . . . . . . . .
why is he under arrest ??

Name a single pakistani who is facing charges for sheltering the likes of bin laden

He was working with a foreign secret service and infringing on sovereignty of the country.

You could compare this to US claims of Russian hacking during US elections. As per your logic, US government should be OK with that because the hacking is showing the corruption within DNC and whatnot. So why are the not OK with that?

Keep in mind, Afridi's case is actually worse because Russia was doing this from thousands of kms away, while Afridi was infringing on the sovereignty while in Pakistan.
 
.
He was working with a foreign secret service and infringing on sovereignty of the country.

You could compare this to US claims of Russian hacking during US elections. As per your logic, US government should be OK with that because the hacking is showing the corruption within DNC and whatnot. So why are the not OK with that?

Keep in mind, Afridi's case is actually worse because Russia was doing this from thousands of kms away, while Afridi was infringing on the sovereignty while in Pakistan.

Not a single American worked with Russia. There is no corruption in the DNC - embarrassing details does not qualify as corruption

Name any Pakistani who was convicted of sheltering Osama Bin laden'
 
.
Not a single American worked with Russia. There is no corruption in the DNC - embarrassing details does not qualify as corruption

Name any Pakistani who was convicted of sheltering Osama Bin laden'

You are replying with arguments that are not relevant to my argument.

The DNC hacking was corruption as per definition, but let's call it embarrassing details. As per your initial argument, since the alleged Russian hacking showed some embarrassing details of what was going on in the US, the US government should have been OK with it. Yes?
 
.
You are replying with arguments that are not relevant to my argument.

The DNC hacking was corruption as per definition, but let's call it embarrassing details. As per your initial argument, since the alleged Russian hacking showed some embarrassing details of what was going on in the US, the US government should have been OK with it. Yes?

Why is DNC hacking corruption ? It is a cyber crime with Russians as alleged criminals.

The US government is not okay with it because it is a cyber crime. Plus it is attempt to interfere with US elections.
 
.
Why is DNC hacking corruption ? It is a cyber crime with Russians as alleged criminals.

The US government is not okay with it because it is a cyber crime. Plus it is attempt to interfere with US elections.
..

DNC hacking is not corruption. What DNC was doing was corruption. Regardless of that, so you understand why US government was not okay with it.

Similary, Pakistan is not OK with releasing Shakil Afridi because he in cahoots with the US infrigned on Pakistan's sovereignty. It's really as simple as that.
 
.
..

DNC hacking is not corruption. What DNC was doing was corruption. Regardless of that, so you understand why US government was not okay with it.

Similary, Pakistan is not OK with releasing Shakil Afridi because he in cahoots with the US infrigned on Pakistan's sovereignty. It's really as simple as that.

Explain what laws the DNC broke. Some of the things you and I define as corruption are legal in America

the folks who sheltered OBL did not infringe on Pakistani sovreignity
 
.
Back
Top Bottom