Pakistan warns India: don't make provocative remarks

[BHarwana]

Agreed

Do we agree here as well on the lineup of Indian surrendered troops 1965?

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

Do we agree here as well on the lineup of Indian surrendered troops 1965?

View attachment 521578 View attachment 521579

And still we manage to captured more land .............Wow... be realistic.... Don't make funny as always.... In the history, pakistan army has won any single WAR but Still world best army as per PDF.

 

[JohnWick]

Hiding behind new sugar Daddy...... your old Daddy (US) would be upset...

And you are also hiding behind dady Putin and Jew dady israel.

 

[GumNaam]

Hiding behind new sugar Daddy...... your old Daddy (US) would be upset...

The old daddy is too busy sodomizing bunghole of his new b!tch called india.

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

The old daddy is too busy sodomizing bunghole of his new b!tch called india.

And b!tch is getting bore ..US, China and looking to Russia........ But Russia is saying, Thanks for offer. Be patient- will check possibility

 

[khansaheeb]

Dreams has no limits..... Even Pakistan can will against Universe army and the world if they fight.

But History says something from 1947.............. I wish Pakistan always win the WAR against India in that way... We are happy to loose the way history is written and nobody can changed the history and great performance.

You need to take a shower and come to your senses:-

 

[GumNaam]

And still we manage to captured more land .............Wow... be realistic.... Don't make funny as always.... In the history, pakistan army has won any single WAR but Still world best army as per PDF.

Captured more land he says...

And b!tch is getting bore ..US, China and looking to Russia........ But Russia is saying, Thanks for offer. Be patient- will check possibility

he just admitted that india is america's b!tch! india nay apni auqaat pehchaan li, good ho giya

 

[khansaheeb]

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

Captured more land he says...
View attachment 521583

Sir ji, if war started to occupy the Jammu and Kashmir but ended with Saving Lahore city and called victory.

If it is a win than I wish Pakistan always won all war against India................. We will be more than happy with you

 

[JohnWick]

Sir ji, if war started to occupy the Jammu and Kashmir but ended with Saving Lahore city and called victory.

If it is a win than I wish Pakistan always won all war against India................. We will be more than happy with you

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

Captured more land he says...
View attachment 521583


he just admitted that india is america's b!tch! india nay apni auqaat pehchaan li, good ho giya

Look at Russian source...your new friend. Ohhh wait, This is also fake...

At the end of a bruising 22-day war, India held 1920 square kilometres of Pakistani territory while Pakistan only held 550 square kilometres of Indian land. The Haji Pir pass was also captured by Indian soldiers after an epic battle. And yet India surrendered everything at the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966.
https://www.rbth.com/blogs/stranger...war-why-india-quit-when-it-was-winning_394095

At least three independent authors believed India had an upper hand in the war:

• Retired American diplomat Dennis Kux: "Although both sides lost heavily in men and material, and neither gained a decisive military advantage, India had the better of the war. Delhi achieved its basic goal of thwarting Pakistan's attempt to seize Kashmir by force. Pakistan gained nothing from a conflict which it had instigated."
• English historian John Keay: "The war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate."
• American author Stanley Wolpert: "The war ended in what appeared to be a draw when the embargo placed by Washington on US ammunition and replacements for both armies forced cessation of conflict before either side won a clear victory. India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the ceasefire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to [Pakistani president] Ayub's chagrin."

 

[GumNaam]

Sir ji, if war started to occupy the Jammu and Kashmir but ended with Saving Lahore city and called victory.

If it is a win than I wish Pakistan always won all war against India................. We will be more than happy with you

india reminds me of conner mcgregor who still claimed to win the war after getting his bunghole handed to him by khabib!

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

india reminds me of conner mcgregor who still claimed to win the war after getting his bunghole handed to him by khabib!

This is more than fine for us.................... but as per your, whatever written in pakistani text book, those are correct and others are saying fake & lie.


At least three independent authors believed India had an upper hand in the war:

• Retired American diplomat Dennis Kux: "Although both sides lost heavily in men and material, and neither gained a decisive military advantage, India had the better of the war. Delhi achieved its basic goal of thwarting Pakistan's attempt to seize Kashmir by force. Pakistan gained nothing from a conflict which it had instigated."
• English historian John Keay: "The war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate."
• American author Stanley Wolpert: "The war ended in what appeared to be a draw when the embargo placed by Washington on US ammunition and replacements for both armies forced cessation of conflict before either side won a clear victory. India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the ceasefire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to [Pakistani president] Ayub's chagrin."

www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33815204

 

[GumNaam]

Look at Russian source...your new friend. Ohhh wait, This is also fake...

At the end of a bruising 22-day war, India held 1920 square kilometres of Pakistani territory while Pakistan only held 550 square kilometres of Indian land. The Haji Pir pass was also captured by Indian soldiers after an epic battle. And yet India surrendered everything at the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966.
https://www.rbth.com/blogs/stranger...war-why-india-quit-when-it-was-winning_394095

At least three independent authors believed India had an upper hand in the war:

• Retired American diplomat Dennis Kux: "Although both sides lost heavily in men and material, and neither gained a decisive military advantage, India had the better of the war. Delhi achieved its basic goal of thwarting Pakistan's attempt to seize Kashmir by force. Pakistan gained nothing from a conflict which it had instigated."
• English historian John Keay: "The war lasted barely a month. Pakistan made gains in the Rajasthan desert but its main push against India's Jammu-Srinagar road link was repulsed and Indian tanks advanced to within a sight of Lahore. Both sides claimed victory but India had most to celebrate."
• American author Stanley Wolpert: "The war ended in what appeared to be a draw when the embargo placed by Washington on US ammunition and replacements for both armies forced cessation of conflict before either side won a clear victory. India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the ceasefire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to [Pakistani president] Ayub's chagrin."

Notice the dates... they are all near the end of the war.

 

[IceCold]

Their funded terrorists just attacked the Chinese consulate, what are we going to do about it or once again PM IK will extend a hand of friendship along with the army chief whose job is to prepare for war and let politicans do the talking, instead he is making such overtures.