Pakistan warns India against targeting its N-installations

[xyxmt]

Cause war is the last option and we believe in peace .

peace loving country that you are, not a single day goes by that your chaddi wearing general give threat of war. You are lucky to be a peace loving country, for your public's sake.

 

[Mrc]

You think IAF wouldn't factor this in .
If such a decision is made IAF would sent at least 300 fighters Su30s + Mirage 2000s + Jaguars at one go and would take out every thing it could leaving you with least chance of counter attack . Some would even carry nukes to respond immediately .

Yeah ... u guys can do any thing.... except building toilets.... say hey to maha indioot

 

[New World]

Do you have the wherewithal to defend against 300 4th gen or advanced 3rd gens fighters ??

When chips are down , bluster alone wont help .

there are already 150 4th gen and 350 3rd gen fighter ready for them.

 

[Mrc]

But I agree with one thing .... chances of nuclear clash are high in sub continent....

Although it is un imaginable to survive... but we shud keep plans ready and endeavour to win

Operation unthinkable

 

[Yaseen1]

Even before the first Pakistani missile reach mid course , Prithivis would fly from bases in Rajastan .
We watch you constantly from satellites .

even u.s is unable to find in advance exact time of nkorea missile launch how you indian can find our missile launch time and date in advance

 

[khanmubashir]

WASHINGTON: Foreign Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif warned on Thursday that if India launched a surgical strike on the country’s nuclear installations, nobody should expect restraint from Pakistan either.

Indian Air Force chief B.S. Dhanoa said on Wednesday that if India needed to carry out a surgical strike, his aircraft could target Pakistan’s nuclear installations and destroy them.

The foreign minister addressed the Indian air chief’s remarks at a talk at the US Institute of Peace in Washington on Thursday, urging Indian leaders not to contemplate such actions as those could have dire consequences.

“Yesterday, the Indian air chief said we will hit, through another surgical strike, Pakistan’s nuclear installations. If that happens, nobody should expect restraint from us. That’s the most diplomatic language I can use,” said Mr Asif.

The foreign minister, who is in Washington on a three-day official visit, met US National Security Adviser Gen H.R. McMaster on Thursday, a day after he held wide-ranging talks with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. While both US and Pakistani sides have described the Asif-Tillerson talks as “positive” and “useful”, Mr Asif indicated that his meeting with Gen McMaster was not as friendly as the earlier meeting.

“I will not be extravagant, yesterday’s meeting went very well, today’s meeting with Gen McMaster in the morning, I would be a bit cautious about it. But it was good. It was good. It wasn’t bad,” said the foreign minister when asked if his trip to Washington was going well.

Talks with Tillerson
The shared interest in a secure, prosperous and democratic Pakistan was one of the key issues discussed in a frank conversation between Mr Tillerson and Mr Asif, says the US State Department.

The two top diplomats met at the State Department in Washington on Wednesday for talks aimed at halting a rapid deterioration in bilateral ties.

Also read: Don't blame Pakistan, Haqqanis were your 'darlings' at one time: Asif tells US

“They talked about the importance of partnering together to establish peace and prosperity in the region. They talked about their mutual commitment to advancing a multifaceted relationship between the United States and Pakistan based on our shared interest in a secure, prosperous, and democratic Pakistan,” said State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert when asked what was discussed in the meeting.

“The foreign minister and the secretary talked about the president’s South Asia strategy that was announced back in August. They also exchanged ideas about how our countries can work together to help stabilise Afghanistan,” she added.

Although their relations were already tense, the tensions worsened after US President Donald Trump’s Aug 21 policy speech in which he warned Pakistan to eradicate alleged terrorist safe havens from its soil or be ready for the consequences.

Later, senior US officials told various media outlets that the United States could stop providing economic and military assistance to Pakistan, degrade its status of a major non-Nato ally and place Pakistani officials with alleged ties to terrorists on a terrorist-watch list.

At the State Department briefing, a journalist pointed out that when the new US strategy was unveiled, the language about US-Pakistani ties was much harsher than what Secretary Tillerson used in his remarks after the meeting. “Was none of (the punitive actions underlined by US officials) discussed with the Pakistani foreign minister?” the journalist asked.

“We typically don’t provide the fulsome types of readouts, we don’t do a play-by-play, a blow-by-blow of everything that happens in our private diplomatic conversations,” the spokesperson responded.

“What I just read to you, that’s what I can provide to you from the meeting. I know our conversations with the Pakistani government continue to be frank,” she added.

Another journalist reminded Ms Nauert in that response to a question at this stakeout on Wednesday, Secretary Tillerson had expressed concerns about the future of government of Pakistan. “What did he mean by that?”

Ms Nauert said she did not get the chance to ask the secretary about those remarks and that’s why she did not know what he meant.

Responding to a question about US-Pakistan relations at his stakeout, Secretary Tillerson had said: “We have concerns about the future of Pakistan’s government too, in terms of them — we want their government to be stable. We want it to be peaceful. And many of the same issues they’re struggling with inside of Pakistan are our issues.”

Published in Dawn, October 6th, 2017

WASHINGTON: Foreign Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif warned on Thursday that if India launched a surgical strike on the country’s nuclear installations, nobody should expect restraint from Pakistan either.

Indian Air Force chief B.S. Dhanoa said on Wednesday that if India needed to carry out a surgical strike, his aircraft could target Pakistan’s nuclear installations and destroy them.

The foreign minister addressed the Indian air chief’s remarks at a talk at the US Institute of Peace in Washington on Thursday, urging Indian leaders not to contemplate such actions as those could have dire consequences.

“Yesterday, the Indian air chief said we will hit, through another surgical strike, Pakistan’s nuclear installations. If that happens, nobody should expect restraint from us. That’s the most diplomatic language I can use,” said Mr Asif.

The foreign minister, who is in Washington on a three-day official visit, met US National Security Adviser Gen H.R. McMaster on Thursday, a day after he held wide-ranging talks with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. While both US and Pakistani sides have described the Asif-Tillerson talks as “positive” and “useful”, Mr Asif indicated that his meeting with Gen McMaster was not as friendly as the earlier meeting.

“I will not be extravagant, yesterday’s meeting went very well, today’s meeting with Gen McMaster in the morning, I would be a bit cautious about it. But it was good. It was good. It wasn’t bad,” said the foreign minister when asked if his trip to Washington was going well.

Talks with Tillerson
The shared interest in a secure, prosperous and democratic Pakistan was one of the key issues discussed in a frank conversation between Mr Tillerson and Mr Asif, says the US State Department.

The two top diplomats met at the State Department in Washington on Wednesday for talks aimed at halting a rapid deterioration in bilateral ties.

Also read: Don't blame Pakistan, Haqqanis were your 'darlings' at one time: Asif tells US

“They talked about the importance of partnering together to establish peace and prosperity in the region. They talked about their mutual commitment to advancing a multifaceted relationship between the United States and Pakistan based on our shared interest in a secure, prosperous, and democratic Pakistan,” said State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert when asked what was discussed in the meeting.

“The foreign minister and the secretary talked about the president’s South Asia strategy that was announced back in August. They also exchanged ideas about how our countries can work together to help stabilise Afghanistan,” she added.

Although their relations were already tense, the tensions worsened after US President Donald Trump’s Aug 21 policy speech in which he warned Pakistan to eradicate alleged terrorist safe havens from its soil or be ready for the consequences.

Later, senior US officials told various media outlets that the United States could stop providing economic and military assistance to Pakistan, degrade its status of a major non-Nato ally and place Pakistani officials with alleged ties to terrorists on a terrorist-watch list.

At the State Department briefing, a journalist pointed out that when the new US strategy was unveiled, the language about US-Pakistani ties was much harsher than what Secretary Tillerson used in his remarks after the meeting. “Was none of (the punitive actions underlined by US officials) discussed with the Pakistani foreign minister?” the journalist asked.

“We typically don’t provide the fulsome types of readouts, we don’t do a play-by-play, a blow-by-blow of everything that happens in our private diplomatic conversations,” the spokesperson responded.

“What I just read to you, that’s what I can provide to you from the meeting. I know our conversations with the Pakistani government continue to be frank,” she added.

Another journalist reminded Ms Nauert in that response to a question at this stakeout on Wednesday, Secretary Tillerson had expressed concerns about the future of government of Pakistan. “What did he mean by that?”

Ms Nauert said she did not get the chance to ask the secretary about those remarks and that’s why she did not know what he meant.

Responding to a question about US-Pakistan relations at his stakeout, Secretary Tillerson had said: “We have concerns about the future of Pakistan’s government too, in terms of them — we want their government to be stable. We want it to be peaceful. And many of the same issues they’re struggling with inside of Pakistan are our issues.”

Published in Dawn, October 6th, 2017

Indian Air Force chief B.S. Dhanoa said on Wednesday that if India needed to carry out a surgical strike ¿?????
What to expect from a man who has BS in his name

 

[war&peace]

The question is what let to Indian Air chief make such a statement and that too right after US defense chief Mattis visited India? Is US finally prepared to offer India something on our F-16s that made Indian chief give such a bold statement? You may shred it off as conspiracy but there is certainly no harm in analyzing this angle as well. Mastan sb has long advocated about the possibility of this. Araz sb and Oscar sb have routinely refuted it.
@Horus @fatman17 @MastanKhan @Oscar @araz @war&peace @DESERT FIGHTER your opinion gentlemen?

If I have to make a recommendation and just a single point answer. Test an ICBM asap with the longest range you can ... Always speak from a strong vantage point.
Learn something NK and STOP PROCRASTINATION.

 

[El Sidd]

any launch from either east or west will result in mutual destruction of the sub continent.

 

[Cyberian]

Pakistan will turn India into a blackhole.

 

[Mugwop]

Cause war is the last option and we believe in peace .

Why make such bold statements if you believe in peace? You people are far from peaceful and all your neighbors hate you. If north korea and America were your neighbors they would conduct a joint attack on india.
You can't bully or intimidate Pakistan and that's what tortures you hence you join pdf.

Yeah ... u guys can do any thing.... except building toilets.... say hey to maha indioot

They don't need toilets ,they already have adult diapers

 

[TOPGUN]

The thing with indians is that seem to think that they are supermen with Bollywood tales, wake up and start living in real life such comments only come from pathetic losers.

 

[war&peace]

Pakistan will turn India into a blackhole.

I think it is already a ____ hole. You just need to add the suitable adjective.

supermen with Bollywood tales

Try TAILS instead of TALES

 

[TOPGUN]

I think it is already a ____ hole. You just need to add the suitable adjective.


Try TAILS instead of TALES

 

[idune]

Modi is thinking of early election, indian economy is not as good as Modi promised. Indian army withdrawn from Doklam literally tail between legs. So his dogs are barking to attract gullible class.

Having said that, Pakistan should extract maximum political benefit by labeling india as war monger, unstable and run by mad politicians.

 

[araz]

You think IAF wouldn't factor this in .
If such a decision is made IAF would sent at least 300 fighters Su30s + Mirage 2000s + Jaguars at one go and would take out every thing it could leaving you with least chance of counter attack . Some would even carry nukes to respond immediately .

Suriya.
No planes are needed and a surgical strike on a nuclear installation is a dream coming from any side. This would be responded to and as there cannot be any chances taken of a response from the other side, this strike would be massive. The response would also come at the same time. So in short there wont be much more than a few rats left on either side. If India is idiotic enough then please do come.
But why do that when there are other ways of hurting Pak which India has been doing so well for decades. Nonstate actors in Baluchistan, KPK and Sindh have done a wonderful job for you and put Pak on the back foot. So why would you destroy that.
I suspect they are playing to the gallery and mustering up international support while getting as much business in house as they can. This is more about money than Indo Pak. At least not yet.
A