What's new

Pakistan wants to include third-party to resolve Kashmir dispute: PM Nawaz

.
How about a referendum in Kashmir? That will be a good "document"..... So its about the document ?? (Endian logic... where logic ends)

Do you even know the pre-condition of the referendum in UN resolution, first Pakistan need to vacate the Kashmir which you never did. :omghaha::omghaha:

SO it was about princely states and not about religion? wao what an analysis .... :rofl::rofl:


This is a Pakistan website giving full details about a dozen of Hindu majority princely states Pakistan wanted to grab after giving the theory of Hindus-Muslims can't live together and the same article also have lots of grumbling how India spoiled their plans to get Hindu majority princely. :rofl::rofl::rofl:

Quaid-iAzam, Muslim League and the Accession of Princely States

So, after the plan failed, you started making excuses of Kashmir's Muslim majority. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
. .
It was a game how to get as many princely states, religion hardly came in between when Pakistan was thinking of getting them. Pakistan had another plans to stop as many princely states to join India as strong India wasn't in their interest. But in the last Pakistan got none of the Hindu majority princely states, couldn't stop any princely state to join India and also lost Kashmir, with them they brought religion logic how they should have got Kashmir because of its Muslim majority. :laugh:
Yeah,I have heard jinnah was pursuading the rajas in rajasthan to join pakistan and had even given them a signed blank paper to fill in any conditions and demands they would like to fill for joining pakistan
 
.
Good move by Pakistan... I consider such statements as pressure tactics though. But raising Kashmir issue at all global events would help Pakistan and its in the interest of people of Kashmir too.


Lol you are funny, kid :p
FUNNY or non funny ! these are the preconditions for plebiscite !!
 
.
Pakistan seems to have realized that it can not take on India alone, hence it wants the 3rd party:lol: Happy realization btw.
 
.
How about a referendum in Kashmir? That will be a good "document"..... So its about the document ?? (Endian logic... where logic ends)


SO it was about princely states and not about religion? wao what an analysis .... :rofl::rofl:
Oh we agree to referendum and the un resolution but the very first condition in it is that tribals and regular/irregular forces of pakistan move out and Indian army places minimal forces in the state to maintain law and order and then hold referendum alongside un
 
.
What do you mean by GB? GB had no relation to the Kashmir, its just a neighbor region as Punjab.
Friend, I think you need to read some history. Here's a map of pre-partition India. GB was very much part of the princely state of J&K..

india-map-prepartition.jpg
 
.
Yeah,I have heard jinnah was pursuading the rajas in rajasthan to join pakistan and had even given them a signed blank paper to fill in any conditions and demands they would like to fill for joining pakistan

Jinnah tried to lure them with Karachi Port but Sardar Patel assured them of alternate seaport in Kutch. Then there was a massacre of Hindus going on in Hyderabad under full Pakistani patronage and weapon support(as reported by Times Magazine in 1948) to stop them from acceding to India. So, its a big joke that Pakistan talks of rights on Kashmir on the basis of religion when they themselves never followed that rule.
 
.
Jinnah tried to lure them with Karachi Port but Sardar Patel assured them of alternate seaport in Kutch. Then there was a massacre of Hindus going on in Hyderabad under full Pakistani patronage and weapon support(as reported by Times Magazine in 1948) to stop them from acceding to India. So, its a big joke that Pakistan talks of rights on Kashmir on the basis of religion when they themselves never followed that rule.
They still don't care of rights they are hypocrites...look at bangladesh and now baluchistan...
 
. .
What do you mean by GB? GB had no relation to the Kashmir, its just a neighbor region as Punjab.

You don't make rules, GB was the part of princely state of Kashmir and you can't change the history.

indiamap.gif
 
. .
Why is world & UN blind & neglecting 7 lakh Indian Occupiers doing their terrorism in IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir.
Because what Pakistan and people like you keep trotting out are blatant falsehoods!

Firstly this figure of 700,000 Indian soldiers in Kashmir that you guys keep harping on is absolute nonsense! This amounts to about 48 infantry/mountain divisions deployed in Kashmir alone!! Preposterous to say the least. But the sheeple swallow this nonsense hook, line and sinker without using their brains!

Secondly, it's not the Indian security forces but ISI's pet poodles led by 'General' Hafiz Saeed and his yahoos who are indulging in terrorism in Kashmir.
 
Last edited:
.
Because what Pakistan and people like you keep trotting out are blatant falsehoods!

Firstly this figure of 700,000 Indian soldiers in Kashmir that you guys keep harping on is absolute nonsense! This amounts to about 48 infantry/mountain divisions deployed in Kashmir!! Preposterous to say the least. But the sheeple swallow this nonsense hook, line and sinker without using their brains!

Secondly, it's not the Indian security forces but ISI's pet poodles led by 'General' Hafiz Saeed and his yahoos who are indulging in terrorism in Kashmir.
When it comes to Kashmir, don't expect logic to function. Emotional rants, conspiracies, Hinduphobia and myths rule the day. Truth dies a painful death - many times over.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom