Pakistan Wants 'Battlefield' Nukes, against Indian Troops

[Bratva]

As stupid as it gets.

What do they think?Nuking our IBGs will let them get away?India would definitely retaliate.

Moreover they will only nuke us when our troops have crossed the border so they will be nuking their own country and civilians.

Is there any civilians in Thar/Rajhastan desert ?

 

[COLDHEARTED AVIATOR]

Is there any civilians in Thar/Rajhastan desert ?

So Mr.Think Tank do you think India will take your suggestion on the route to take before entering Pakistan?

 

[Bratva]

So Mr.Think Tank do you think India will take your suggestion on the route to take before entering Pakistan?

It's a matter of common sense. In which areas, Indian army held multiple exercise in recent years to validate the concept related to fast movement and speedy logistics of corps . Rajasthan or Punjab ?

Punjab and Kashmir borders are sufficiently fortified.

, TNW is for Rajasthan/Thar desert. large gaps exist which can't be defended by a slow moving Pakistan Army corps

next time put a more thought and sense in your replies.

 

[SipahSalar]

Please be clear in what you are saying.In case of a nuclear strike with Nasr India will may or may not strike with full force.We can also tactically nuke Pakistan with Nasr like missile.War may stop after this,In any case Paksitani territory has been nuked two to three times or even more and in the long therm it will be disastrous for Pakistan.

Why the presumption that there will be no nukes launched on Indian territory?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Truth hurts.

Goes both ways ,, bachay.

 

[SipahSalar]

Nasr doesnt have enough range to cover all the cities of India.

What kind of an idiot will try to nuke an indian city with Nasr? Rofl. Its a BATTLEFIELD TNW.

 

[COLDHEARTED AVIATOR]

It's a matter of common sense. In which areas, Indian army held multiple exercise in recent years to validate the concept related to fast movement and speedy logistics of corps . Rajasthan or Punjab ?

Punjab and Kashmir borders are sufficiently fortified.

, TNW is for Rajasthan/Thar desert. large gaps exist which can't be defended by a slow moving Pakistan Army corps

next time put a more thought and sense in your replies.

My common sense tell me that Indian Army would launch offensives right across Punjab and Jammu region into Lahore & Faislabad.

What does your common sense and though process say?Indian Army will choose to hit the deserts?

 

[NKVD]

Punjab and Kashmir borders are sufficiently fortified.

, TNW is for Rajasthan/Thar desert. large gaps exist which can't be defended by a slow moving Pakistan Army corps

next time put a more thought and sense in your replies.

@Bratva Heavy Mobilization of the Forces are covered By Artillery & Today Specially by tactical Missiles.
Indian tactical Missiles will Target your Installations Before Mobilization of the Forces will start into Pakistan

PS: Are You really Related to Bratva or its just in your Avatar

 

[Bratva]

My common sense tell me that Indian Army would launch offensives right across Punjab and Jammu region into Lahore & Faislabad.

What does your common sense and though process say?Indian Army will choose to hit the deserts?

Ever heard of hitting soft belly of an enemy first ? Invading Pakistan through Rajasthan is exactly that and your Indian army multiple exercises in Rajasthan clearly reflect that thinking.

I guess your common sense needs some refinement and enlightenment.

Pakistan Army isn't led by ISIS type Mullahs who will use TNW in Fertile lands of Punjab or radiate water supply of Kashmir.

@Bratva

Heavy Mobilization of the Forces are covered By Artillery & Today tactical Missiles are in Use So
Indian tactical Missiles will be Target your Installations Before Mobilization of the Forces will start into Pakistan

PS: Are You really Related to Bratva or its just in your Avatar

As if Pakistan sitting lame duck eh ? or we don't have means to reply in kind !

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

My common sense tell me that Indian Army would launch offensives right across Punjab and Jammu region into Lahore & Faislabad.

What does your common sense and though process say?Indian Army will choose to hit the deserts?

Faisalabad doesnt share any border with india..

 

[NKVD]

As if Pakistan sitting lame duck eh ? or we don't have means to reply in kind !

We are Talking About Battlefield Scenarios So the Force Which will be offensive will have Edge first Because Other One don't have Idea About the Scale of the how offensive Strike it will be.In Case of Superior capabilities in Paper Always Favors India

 

[The Deterrent]

You realize that India has them too, right? Also that whatever a Nasr can do, a gravity bomb strapped to a mirage-3 or jaguar can also do? What is the revolutionary new capability that short ranged nuclear missiles give that air dropped bombs don't?

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:
A large-scale terrorist strike happens in a major Indian city. Indian establishment decides to respond with brutal conventional force.
7 days after war declaration, IAF gains achieves considerable air superiority over Pakistani airspace and effectively disables PAF's nuclear capability. This happens while Indian Army's IBGs thrust deep into Pakistani territory, and capture strategically valuable landmass. Pakistan's National Command Authority decides to respond with nuclear strikes against the Indian stronghold over the captured area.

The air-arm is gone, so they resort to ASFC's missiles. Why won't they use Hatf-II/III? Because the Hatf-series has simply very big visual signature (big TELs, large number of support vehicles etc), is relatively inaccurate (CEP = 0.1% of range), and has higher yields (reduced yield warheads can be deployed, but that would be costly since expensive missiles are being used).
Here is where Nasr would step in. A small 6x6 TEL with upto two support/command vehicles can drive stealthily up close, launch 4x tactical nukes at the captured area in an even pattern and get out before the artillery responds.

This will provide both countries a chance to negotiate a ceasefire by themselves, if not then alarm the international community to enforce ceasefire immediately, and will effectively create a stalemate-type situation. If anything else, the ball would be in India's court, and what happens next would require a whole new pair of balls rather than a piece of paper stating the NFU.

India has the capability to develop tactical nukes, but hasn't produced and deployed them yet.

 

[Bratva]

We are Talking About Battlefield Scenarios So the Force Which will be offensive will have Edge first Because Other One don't have Idea About the Scale of the how offensive Strike it will be.In Case of Superior capabilities in Paper Always Favors India

How long you will be able to maintain that edge ? Your thrust would slow down pertaining to multiple factors, replenishment of supplies, coordination and movement of soldiers and once that happen. TNW would come into play.

 

[NKVD]

How long you will be able to maintain that edge ? Your thrust would slow down pertaining to multiple factors, replenishment of supplies, coordination and movement of soldiers and once that happen. TNW would come into play.

TNW will be used when there will loose end I again repeat before heavy mobilizations your installations will targeted.

 

[NKVD]

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:
A large-scale terrorist strike happens in a major Indian city. Indian establishment decides to respond with brutal conventional force.
7 days after war declaration, IAF gains achieves considerable air superiority over Pakistani airspace and effectively disables PAF's nuclear capability. This happens while Indian Army's IBGs thrust deep into Pakistani territory, and capture strategically valuable landmass. Pakistan's National Command Authority decides to respond with nuclear strikes against the Indian stronghold over the captured area.

The air-arm is gone, so they resort to ASFC's missiles. Why won't they use Hatf-II/III? Because the Hatf-series has simply very big visual signature (big TELs, large number of support vehicles etc), is relatively inaccurate (CEP = 0.1% of range), and has higher yields (reduced yield warheads can be deployed, but that would be costly since expensive missiles are being used).
Here is where Nasr would step in. A small 6x6 TEL with upto two support/command vehicles can drive stealthily up close, launch 4x tactical nukes at the captured area in an even pattern and get out before the artillery responds.

This will provide both countries a chance to negotiate a ceasefire by themselves, if not then alarm the international community to enforce ceasefire immediately, and will effectively create a stalemate-type situation. If anything else, the ball would be in India's court, and what happens next would require a whole new pair of balls rather than a piece of paper stating the NFU.

India has the capability to develop tactical nukes, but hasn't produced and deployed them yet.

Wrong
Indian already tested there tactical nukes way back in 1998 shaki-3 &4 are all sub kiloton weapon's termed as experimental device are all TNW level
There is a reason India developed parhaar tactical missile to as delivery mechanism.