3 MOA is very good for a battle/assault rifle.For a battle rifle 3 MOA is not bad at all!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3 MOA is very good for a battle/assault rifle.For a battle rifle 3 MOA is not bad at all!
Not yet the bw20 will be offered to the army for evaluation.Do the Pakistani forces use these rifles?
Well if it meets the new requirements then why not?These are just G-3s in new clothes.
All the primary functions and mechanisms are the same,
Agreed on all of your points of course... However, on a personal note, as an end user, whenever I see something like G3, I surely don't like it . It's human afterall.Well if it meets the new requirements then why not?
So far the reviews state:
- it is lighter
- better recoil management
- similar accuracy and reliability as g3 (which was already one of best)
- options for accessories such as scopes etc.
If this can be achieved with the same infrastructure and machines with no new lic fees, this is win.
@PanzerKiel I know things are a little hostile for you here these days, but do you mind sharing some insights about this project?
People tend to jump the gun and forget the G3 was and still is the Highmark for other competitors in our gun procurement. The G3 still stand tall in terms of reliability but not everything is honky dory and daisy it certainly has serious weight problems among others.Well if it meets the new requirements then why not?
So far the reviews state:
- it is lighter
- better recoil management
- similar accuracy and reliability as g3 (which was already one of best)
- options for accessories such as scopes etc.
If this can be achieved with the same infrastructure and machines with no new lic fees, this is a win.
@PanzerKiel I know things are a little hostile for you here these days, but do you mind sharing some insights about this project?
Is it just the looks you are talking about? What about the new bw20? I think the shape can be modernized - and I am all up for making it more aesthetically appealing: This is a must for civilian market, especially high end exports market like US, and can boost morale of troops who will be spending days and nights with itAgreed on all of your points of course... However, on a personal note, as an end user, whenever I see something like G3, I surely don't like it . It's human afterall.
Could the addition of a Smart scope mitigate the deficiencies of the rifle (Rifle Weight, limited ammunition carried per Soldier, etc.), especially if it would increases the max effective range?Agreed on all of your points of course... However, on a personal note, as an end user, whenever I see something like G3, I surely don't like it . It's human afterall.
Range is one thing.....the man has to carry it around, sometimes in enclosed spaces etc. And then its not only the heavy rifle, you have to carry the ammo as well.Could the addition of a Smart scope mitigate the deficiencies of the rifle (Rifle Weight, limited ammunition carried per Soldier, etc.), especially if it would increases the max effective range?
US Army could add 'smart scope' to its rifles for guaranteed shots
The US Army is evaluating a 'smart scope' that only fires when the software determines a 'guaranteed shot'. The system, called SMASH, uses a weapon-mounted optic and special pistol grip on any gun.www.google.com
Any indication China is working on a Rifle to match the US Next Generation Squad Weapon? And if so, should Pakistan join such a program to leapfrog these older technologies of Rifles, save costs, have access to optics coming out of their defense industry and generally go straight to a “more modern” design?Range is one thing.....the man has to carry it around, sometimes in enclosed spaces etc. And then its not only the heavy rifle, you have to carry the ammo as well.
And army cant fly without imported toys