Pakistan to turn up the heat on Kashmir again

[EAK]

k ... bring it on.

check the link...
Award-winning Army Colonel MN Rai killed in encounter with Freedom Fighters

And Stay Tuned for more

Yes.. Its a Pakistani forum so you can crap all over .. Good, if that's the forum policy .. Did not know. And here I thought its India that is short of toilets. But looks like Pakistanis like you need internet forums to crap on.

 

[AbhimanyuShrivastav]

check the link...
Award-winning Army Colonel MN Rai killed in encounter with Freedom Fighters

And Stay Tuned for more

I did stay tuned but heard something about a bomb explosion in a mosque across the border instead. and This..

Rocket attack on Khuzdar DPO's vehicle kills two cops - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

What's your point ?

 

[PeaceGen]

We shall see.

When we cry, we cry really well. And NOT because we are hurt. You need to read about Chanakya.

And I'll show you right now (i'll read about Chanakya soon-ish).

See you Indian-policies-supporters here are all convinced you don't need "moral superiority" (which i really like to call "a firm continued hold on the moral highground" instead, but your description is a shorter synonym i admit), you think you only need military and economic superiority.

I've studied the histories of wars, especially those fought since WW1. And I'm convinced that the attitude you folks in India are now stuck on is the very same attitude that has prolonged conflicts between nations all over the world, between many different sets of countries. And not just prolonging the conflicts, but setting up these conflicts to too often escalate into the kind of violence where the innocent become "unavoidable collateral damage" in your descriptions, but I know for sure that if you'd place that need for moral superiority (and thus restraint, transparency, and true honest patient diplomacy) ABOVE the need to be militarily and possibly economically superior, then you'd give the conflict between the nations a real chance to eb away into soccer-rivalry , instead of causing too frequent and too nasty bloodshed among innocent adults and children who have no desire to rule others like the governments that make this mistake and their vocal supporters.....

Indeed, your current attitude and priorities are the primary cause for conflicts like we saw in for instance Vietnam and Syria.. I'd like to prevent the India-Pakistan conflict from becoming another like that, which is why i'll keep criticizing unreasonable behavior by Indians, especially on this Pakistani forum where we meet.

i. Kashmir does not exist. There is a Federal state with its Government and it is called Jammu and Kashmir.
ii. We tell Pakistan how many bullets we hide in our socks. We update our secret acquisitions, manufacture etc to the ISPR via Facebook messages. We keep USA, Russia and China in cc.

That just aint enough to gain a firm grip on the moral highground [/QUOTE]

Bottom Line (If our Pakistani friends still didn't know):

Resolution 47 was passed by United Nations Security Council under chapter VI of the UN Charter. Resolutions passed under Chapter VI of UN charter are considered non binding and have NO mandatory enforceability as opposed to the resolutions passed under Chapter VII.

So, the question is: Why did Pakistan agree to pass the Resolution under chapter VI of the UN Charter and not insist on including it under Chapter VII which would have made a plebiscite mandatory and enforceable?

It's no use crying over spilled milk! The Resolution is therefore dead as a dodo. Pakistan can keep crying, and try to internationalize the issue, but no one cares a hoot because they know it's not enforceable!! QED

And needless to say, Part II of the Resolutions clearly states that Pakistan has to withdraw ALL its troops from Kashmir including the razakars brought for the purpose of fighting in Kashmir BEFORE A PLEBISCITE IS HELD.
We're still waiting. In other words, its not going to happen!

So what are they blathering about?

Ha, the very fact that the Pakistanis (a) realize the heavier UN-construction is unfeasable, and (b) voluntarily settle to make a less-binding UN-construction/statement about it, PROVES TO THE WORLD that the Pakistani leadership is a LOT more reasonable than the Indian leaderships and their supporters at the moment.

And *that*, folks, is my primary reason for staying on the Pakistani side of this conflict between India and Pakistan for the moment. More than the (proven) (historical) underdog position of Pakistan even, for an underdog with an unreasonable leadership will not enjoy my full support as the current Pakistani leadership deserves.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

the Pakistani leadership is a LOT more reasonable than the Indian leaderships

Very true. Rest of the folks debating here - give up. Now.