What's new

Pakistan to soon deploy a nasty surprise for Indian Aircraft Carriers.

Population vs ACC and Airforce vs ACC... Strange argument... CBG won't be stepping close to your boarders.. you need to locate ACC first to utilise your birds.. even in that scenario, your airforce can't afford to diversify it's fleet.. and you don't have naval wing..




AWACS to locate CBG? Looks like you forgot earth curvature..

Cbg is located by a variety of means. Eg underwater noise. Any electronic emission (esm). Mpa's and awacs will also contribute, with radar and esm/elint/sigint on board, although this is not primary task of the latter. Hawk aircraft to. Awacs is intended to deal with earth curvature: why else put a big radar up in the sky. Acc may be flyng cap. This can be detected. Awacs role in detecting acc is limited.
 
.
Dont entertain these vermin indians, their history in failiures in missles tech is long and self evident. Stop comparing Pakistan to India, we should compare ourselves with serious nations not jokes like bharat cow mata.....

Every military power had failures in missile development except pakistan where every first attempt is declared success and then inducted. Indeed, you shud compare yourself with some serious nations.
 
. .
Every military power had failures in missile development except pakistan where every first attempt is declared success and then inducted. Indeed, you shud compare yourself with some serious nations.
dont make me laugh kid....
 
.
Ghauri missiles and other surface to surface missiles are not for targeting ships as best as i know.
 
.
Cbg is located by a variety of means. Eg underwater noise. Any electronic emission (esm). Mpa's and awacs will also contribute, with radar and esm/elint/sigint on board, although this is not primary task of the latter. Hawk aircraft to. Awacs is intended to deal with earth curvature: why else put a big radar up in the sky. Acc may be flyng cap. This can be detected. Awacs role in detecting acc is limited.
Just a question that we have rumours that Pakistan has access to Chinese satellites providing live image so how hard is it to identify a CBG in Indian ocean through live satellite imagery, provided that general location of the CBG will always be tracked by Pakistan in hostile situation ...

Disclaimer : I am not aware of chinese live imagery details so I might be worng in assumng that Chinese can track live imagery ...
 
.
Problem is only India has access to every tech in the world. Other countries cannot acquire tech in India's dreams. Let them have these sweet dreams. Good for us when we have a showdown. They will be surprised and caught off guard.
 
.
Problem is only India has access to every tech in the world.
Partially true. India has access to Russian as well as American and Israeli tech. And that's the only country that have such access in South Asia. I don't know about outside this spear. And China don't have that luxury. Most of the weapons made in China have their ancestors in Russia/USSR.
Other countries cannot acquire tech in India's dreams. Let them have these sweet dreams. Good for us when we have a showdown. They will be surprised and caught off guard.
Only fools would under estimate enemy. That too a nuclear weapon state. Even if Mauritius declare war against India, things won't be easy.
 
.
As I said and confirmed by Indians that they have all the tech. Everybody Else is backwards. Let them troll in Fool's paradise. Gud for them. Excellent for us.
 
. .
Can you give an idea .... about naval engagement..o_O:what: if we know nothing Mr trolling:enjoy::p:
Respected sir
As per your mood i should suggest u that even if u got awacs ,land based radars , Chinese satellite access still than what makes u think a surface to surface missile with a range of 2200 km with a flight path pre-designated with no mid course path change and hitting a moving target at 30 knots is possible:crazy:with the enemy have much advanced larger area under detection through land based;sea based radar's and its own military satellite up in the sky :hitwall:with P8I planes for search and track as one of there role makes u think u could target a missile which we already be knowing well before u even fire them first and then mind it sir barak 8 isn't to chase its placed their to tackle implying it coming from front not back with proximity explosion as measure to counter with 60 kg of explosive material is more than enough for you missile to be vanished in terminal phase imlying a just a little speed of over mach 1 let alone be it in re-entry phase :coffee:
Further any missile with that range would more or less be considered a TNW 'THUS IN RETURN :smitten:".
:guns::cheesy:
 
. .
These babies are enough to deter American CBGs,

images1.jpg


CM-400 AKG .jpg



Its already an overkill for Indian junk.


Bachey kee jaan logay kia ? :D
 
.
These babies are enough to deter American CBGs,

View attachment 417201

View attachment 417202


Its already an overkill for Indian junk.


Bachey kee jaan logay kia ? :D



Lol you are comparing PN with USN ànd IN.. good joke.. you should have something in inventory to call IN flotilla junk... Deterring USN CBG, that was hilarious... USN can fight with next 5 navies combined... No end for your stupidity...
 
.
Lol you are comparing PN with USN ànd IN.. good joke.. you should have something in inventory to call IN flotilla junk... Deterring USN CBG, that was hilarious... USN can fight with next 5 navies combined... No end for your stupidity...

Understand what the word "deter" mean my temple educated RSS goon.

As for IN, they know they their place. They wont venture out towards Pakistani waters and our sea lines in case of hostilities. Those missiles in pics I posted are one of the reasons.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom